| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
OakTown18
Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 56
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:38 am Post subject: Possible Trade with 49ers |
|
|
|
Dont Get excited, But this is a possible trade with the Raiders and the 49ers....
49ers Get- Marquis Tuiasisopo
Charles Woodson
2nd Round pick
Raiders Get- 1st Overall Pick
3rd or 4th or 5th round pick
There is many possible trades with Woodson
check them out.
http://www.raidernews.com/article.php?story=20050405040438655 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SanDiegoRaiderFan 
Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Remember though, Oaktown, the article says that trade is unlikely because Woodson is represented by the Postons and the 49ers had trouble with them because they also represent Julian Peterson. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mr.knowitall
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 672 Location: In bed with your mom. REEYEEH REEYEEH REEYEEH!!
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I hate that frickin trade. Post another proposal cause I hate even seeing that someone was dumb enough to right that in an article. _________________ POINT PROVEN!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Knight
Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 371 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| yeah...that trade would be horrible...for the Raiders! Give up Tui AND Woodson AND 2nd round pick......fo WHAT?? The #1 overall and a 4th rounder?? The #1 pick isn't worth that much. Maybe just give up Woodson and Tui for the 1st overall....and maybe a 3rd round choice. Then I can see the Raiders trading down and getting more picks! yeah! lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Knight
Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 371 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| It would be nice to see them work out a deal with Washington or Arizona actually....i would love to get at least a 1st round pick and maybe another 3rd rounder. We can use that 1st pick to get Rogers, Rolle, or Pac Man. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|