| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
duh bears!
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 42
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:34 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
#31=600
#35=550
#77=205
________
1355
#3=1800
- 1355
________
445
By the "value chart" we would need a second next year.
Philly would be a good trading partner because they have 2 thirds and 2 seconds and not too many holes to fill. They could get a stud runing back or reciever w/ #4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
duh bears!
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 42
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sorry i meant #4 = 1800 pts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Where'sRaymont?
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 4856
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| That trade with Philly would be terrible for us, and that's why we haven't been winning for the last decade. We always make the safer cheaper moves, and we get good players, but no great ones. We are in a great position now with a lot of young talent and a high draft pick. Let's pick a great one to put us right in the hunt for the playoffs and beyond. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jack
Joined: 05 Mar 2005
Posts: 4173
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yeah but not w/DJ. I know, and I agree he would be a nice player to get, but we have bigger needs that we could get w/the #4 pick. DJ would be AWESOME if we absolutuly NEEDED an OLB, but we dont need a OLB that early. We need another WR 1st to compliment Moose, a RB also to back T. Jones up, and get a fresh set of legs in there every once in a while, and we need a starting OLB. I say #4 pick-WR, trade the 2nd rounder away for additionall picks and pick up an OLB w/the next pick, and a K with the pick after that, and a RB after that. Because this draft is so deep @ RB, we can afford to take one in the later rounds.
_________________
"You may have the greatest bunch of individual stars in the world, but if they don’t play together, the club won’t be worth a dime."--Babe Ruth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
duh bears!
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 42
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Where'sRaymont? wrote: | | That trade with Philly would be terrible for us, and that's why we haven't been winning for the last decade. We always make the safer cheaper moves, and we get good players, but no great ones. We are in a great position now with a lot of young talent and a high draft pick. Let's pick a great one to put us right in the hunt for the playoffs and beyond. |
Sooooo.......that's how New England did it huh? With high draft picks drafting great players........ooooooook!
That's why Cincy and Clev are so great taking all of those great players at the top. I think I understand now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Where'sRaymont?
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 4856
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| New England is an anomaly in our league right now. They have had such good continuity in their front office, and in their coaching. Plus, they have gotten very lucky as far as having a team of guys that will totally buy into their system. The fact is this is a league full of individuals, and most will not buy into that total team concept unfortunately. We have had no continuity with this team and we are on the brink of something good. Take the best player DJ IMO, and wreak some havok in the NFC. I'm sick of losing. IF we trade down, then we would be building more for the future, and Angelo will probably get fired if the season is like last years. Then, we would be back where we started as a new GM would want to come in and bring his own players. Trading down would be a huge mistake unless we can either get Dallas' or SD's first rounders |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
