| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Broadway Joe 
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 1838 Location: Point Place, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:54 pm Post subject: Is the Defense for real? |
|
|
|
This defense has dominated and has been dominated throughout the season.
So, what are you're thoughts on it?
I think this defense is very different compared to last year's, we are allowing more yards per game, but we are forcing more turnovers. And we still can't cover a freaking TE.
I think the Cowboys will be their biggest test so far (aside from the Saints, in which we failed miserably). A team with a damn good pair of TE's and one of the deepest backfields in the league. A solid offensive line and an inconsistent QB.
I think if they perform as they did against the Giants, this Defense is for real. _________________
Thanks to Braylon4MVP for the sig and avy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonu62882 
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 3389 Location: Kiltman on the awesome sig!
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yeah, I think this defense is for real. I think they are a Top 10 D. I like that we force a lot fo TO's(with a +12 TO differential).
I think we need to work on our rush D.
I think most of it relies on McDermott and his lack of experience, but I think he'll get there. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mm6492 
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 7611
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jonu62882 wrote: | Yeah, I think this defense is for real. I think they are a Top 10 D. I like that we force a lot fo TO's(with a +12 TO differential).
I think we need to work on our rush D.
I think most of it relies on McDermott and his lack of experience, but I think he'll get there. |
I do not think much of this falls on McDermott
We couldn't cover the TE, get a rush with our front 4, or consistently shut down the run even with JJ and Dawkins here. _________________
PROPS to Kiltman on the Avatar and Sig!!!
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=297830
^^^GREATEST THREAD EVER^^^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hexagrams 
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Posts: 391
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mm6492 wrote: | | jonu62882 wrote: | Yeah, I think this defense is for real. I think they are a Top 10 D. I like that we force a lot fo TO's(with a +12 TO differential).
I think we need to work on our rush D.
I think most of it relies on McDermott and his lack of experience, but I think he'll get there. |
I do not think much of this falls on McDermott
We couldn't cover the TE, get a rush with our front 4, or consistently shut down the run even with JJ and Dawkins here. |
MM is dead on. New guy is the same as the old guy. I don't see a lot of difference in our defense from the last bunch of years. Personnel is mostly the same, scheme is mostly the same, except now our secondary is catching balls instead of knocking them down.
Our Defense is solid, as always. When you blitz as much as we do you are going to get exposed. Lets remember too that the Saints game the offense and special teams gave them the ball twice with a short field. You can't put the Saints score entirely on the defense. _________________
| Sheldon Brown on his hit on Reggie Bush wrote: | | It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box. |
-phire- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rock_#5 
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Posts: 515 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Nice thread Joe, Do i think this defense is for real?
Yes,Sean has been great for us. No defense will look good when they are constantly being put in a bad position like we were in the NO game. Our D has been the defense of my dreams,We shut down the run,we get great pressure on the QB, and we get a ton of turnovers. Our LB's have been good this year,Our D-Line has gotten even better, and we have the best CB duo in the league who are backed by a great SS and a very physical and young FS. _________________
Props to Kiltman^
Favs
NFL:Eagles, Megatron,AJ,AP,
MLB: White Sox,A-Rod,DJ,Howard,Pujols
NBA:Bulls,Granger,Kobe,Dwight.
UFC: GSP,Machida,Rashad Evans,Anderson Silva |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Broadway Joe 
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 1838 Location: Point Place, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rock_#5 wrote: | Nice thread Joe, Do i think this defense is for real?
Yes,Sean has been great for us. No defense will look good when they are constantly being put in a bad position like we were in the NO game. Our D has been the defense of my dreams,We shut down the run,we get great pressure on the QB, and we get a ton of turnovers. Our LB's have been good this year,Our D-Line has gotten even better, and we have the best CB duo in the league who are backed by a great SS and a very physical and young FS. |
Thanks Rock, I appreciate it.
I think this defense has taken advantages of mistakes and getting pressure which is exactly what is designed to do. And has worked out great for us, and as long as our offense plays like past Sunday they'll both compliment each unit nicely.
Unfortunately over the years it has lacked the ability to be consitent in stoping the run and almost nonexistent against TEs and that's what it lacks to be a complete D. Every so often we will get exposed like against the Cards in the NFCCG.
And since it has allowed more yards than last year I'm afraid that we might see a collapse along the season or OC figures us out and expose us. _________________
Thanks to Braylon4MVP for the sig and avy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fly eagles fly
Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Posts: 10532 Location: Philly
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yeah, I think we're good but we have some holes and IT ALL REVOLVES AROUND THE LINEBACKERS. We have two main problems in this defense that I've noticed:
A. We can't cover a tight end. We've known that for the last year and it's showing we need somebody to be able to step up and handle that role. With Bradley likely coming back into the middle and Witherspoon kicking to the weak-side we'll likely need to find somebody of that mold in a strong-side linebacker. There's nobody that really fits the bill in the draft, and we'll likely have to find somebody via free agency. It will be harder with the new CBA. Options are really limited mainly to Derrick Johnson of the Chiefs in terms of legitimate strong-side linebackers but even then, he's not the best there is in coverage. There are a handful of weakside backers in free agency who would be worth it such as Thomas Howard but then we'd be without a legitimate SAM. However, we could potentially keep Witherspoon in the middle and kick Bradley outside in that situation. Yes, FD, we know. Bradley can't cover well but we don't have too many options and you can scheme around that to prevent him from going into man coverage any more than he normally would be.
B. We struggle to pick up our assignments quickly enough on the blitz. Again, this leads back to our linebackers getting onto their men or zone quickly enough or the safeties dropping into man coverage soon enough. It can be worked out though
Basically, we need to re-model the linebacker position, and with a younger defensive coordinator who takes JJ's premise to a more modern level, you need some talent at the position _________________

^Lork 88^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phire 
 Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 12801 Location: Ursinus College
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| hexagrams wrote: | | mm6492 wrote: | | jonu62882 wrote: | Yeah, I think this defense is for real. I think they are a Top 10 D. I like that we force a lot fo TO's(with a +12 TO differential).
I think we need to work on our rush D.
I think most of it relies on McDermott and his lack of experience, but I think he'll get there. |
I do not think much of this falls on McDermott
We couldn't cover the TE, get a rush with our front 4, or consistently shut down the run even with JJ and Dawkins here. |
MM is dead on. New guy is the same as the old guy. I don't see a lot of difference in our defense from the last bunch of years. Personnel is mostly the same, scheme is mostly the same, except now our secondary is catching balls instead of knocking them down.
Our Defense is solid, as always. When you blitz as much as we do you are going to get exposed. Lets remember too that the Saints game the offense and special teams gave them the ball twice with a short field. You can't put the Saints score entirely on the defense. |
Our defense, whether called by JJ or McDermott, is based on gambles and our good games are going to look very good, and our bad ones grueling, slow, painful, and frustrating.
When this defense is working to design - disrupting quarterbacks, stuffing running backs at the line, and forcing turnovers - the opposing offense is in for a long, long game.
When opposing offenses take advantage of our defensive design (see Drew Brees) - the short passing game, tight ends, and running backs out of the backfield - will guarantee the Eagles will be in for a long game. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
willruggiano 
Joined: 23 Nov 2008 Posts: 692 Location: Brian Dawkins, "I'll always be an Eagle."
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The thing is though, our defense ISN'T good at getting pressure, our scheme is. Our pass rush from our front four is actually pretty bad. It's pretty simple for opposing offenses, tackle and back with Trent Cole, and double team Brodrick Bunkley. After that, Patterson/Laws aren't going to hurt you and whoever at LDE isn't going to either.
Seriously, our defense is predicated around sending more people than the offense can block and forcing errant throws from the quarterback. Then our backfield just captialize on the bad throws.
Which is why we struggle covering tight ends. Because there's so much room in the middle of the field, because the linebackers are blitzing. So I mean yeah our linebackers aren't great cover guys, but if they're one on one with an tight end (and the good ones that we've played) they will get abused every time. It's like putting a cheesesteak in front of Andy Reid and telling him not to eat it. It just won't happen.
Our defense revolves around disrupting the offenses rythhm, getting them off schedule. If we could do that with only 4-5 guys, man would that do wonders to our linebacking core, and defense as a whole. You see it in Idianapolis. They have a great one-two punch at defensive end in Freeney and Mathis. They don't have to worry about sending backers on blitzes because their front four can get consistent pressure. It works wonders when your backers are in coverage, maybe double teaming the tight end with a QB spy, as opposed to there being seven-eight guys in the box trying to get pressure. That's when you see the quick slants, 5 yard hitches, tight end choice routes, and ball/flat/swing routes from the backs. I'll tell you what, if I was an opposing QB, I'd be licking my chops thinking about playing against us. Why? The middle of the field is WIDE open because there's no linebackers because they are all blitzing.
All that being said, and all the crap our linebackers get about tight end coverage, etc. Our D-Line should be our
main priority this offseason. Get a threat opposite Trent Cole, and a big body next to Bunkley and watch the magic unfold.
I had to get my Andy-food joke in there somewhere.  _________________
A Kiltman Sig!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe5B8W8ZyR4
R.I.P. Jim Johnson |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Kev-O 
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 637 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
When the defense realizes there's a position on the offense called a tight end and he actually has to be covered once in a while, they'll be for real. _________________
Thanks to Y2lamanaki |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonu62882 
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 3389 Location: Kiltman on the awesome sig!
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mm6492 wrote: | | jonu62882 wrote: | Yeah, I think this defense is for real. I think they are a Top 10 D. I like that we force a lot fo TO's(with a +12 TO differential).
I think we need to work on our rush D.
I think most of it relies on McDermott and his lack of experience, but I think he'll get there. |
I do not think much of this falls on McDermott
We couldn't cover the TE, get a rush with our front 4, or consistently shut down the run even with JJ and Dawkins here. |
This is pretty much the same personnel as last year, and last year we had the 3rd best D(including the 3rd best run D). Hmmm...
The lack of ability to cover a TE or maintain a consistent 4-man rush is all about not having the right personnel, but McDermott has to come up with creative ways to disguise all our deficiencies and weaknesses like JJ did as best as he could until we acquire "better" personnel. Ultimately, you have to work with what you're given and make the best of it. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nabbs4u 
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Posts: 7698 Location: MHC ,NC.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's to early to tell. If we get through the next 3 games against Dallas, SD and Chicago with very good preformances then I'll start to agree. Until we prove it on a consistant basis against Top 10 Offenses it doesn't matter if we destroy the Bottom Dwelling teams in this league. The Giants this week and Carolina in week 1 were a good start. Unfortunately NO was horrible. Slow down the 2nd Ranked Offense in Dallas and 12th ranked in SD after dismanteling the 5th ranked Giants then we have something to excited about. _________________
Props to Dawg24 on the Sig
2009 BGSA, EFBL ,ENBD Champion and EFFMD CO-Champion |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Broadway Joe 
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 1838 Location: Point Place, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| willruggiano wrote: | The thing is though, our defense ISN'T good at getting pressure, our scheme is. Our pass rush from our front four is actually pretty bad. It's pretty simple for opposing offenses, tackle and back with Trent Cole, and double team Brodrick Bunkley. After that, Patterson/Laws aren't going to hurt you and whoever at LDE isn't going to either.
Seriously, our defense is predicated around sending more people than the offense can block and forcing errant throws from the quarterback. Then our backfield just captialize on the bad throws.
Which is why we struggle covering tight ends. Because there's so much room in the middle of the field, because the linebackers are blitzing. So I mean yeah our linebackers aren't great cover guys, but if they're one on one with an tight end (and the good ones that we've played) they will get abused every time. It's like putting a cheesesteak in front of Andy Reid and telling him not to eat it. It just won't happen.
Our defense revolves around disrupting the offenses rythhm, getting them off schedule. If we could do that with only 4-5 guys, man would that do wonders to our linebacking core, and defense as a whole. You see it in Idianapolis. They have a great one-two punch at defensive end in Freeney and Mathis. They don't have to worry about sending backers on blitzes because their front four can get consistent pressure. It works wonders when your backers are in coverage, maybe double teaming the tight end with a QB spy, as opposed to there being seven-eight guys in the box trying to get pressure. That's when you see the quick slants, 5 yard hitches, tight end choice routes, and ball/flat/swing routes from the backs. I'll tell you what, if I was an opposing QB, I'd be licking my chops thinking about playing against us. Why? The middle of the field is WIDE open because there's no linebackers because they are all blitzing.
All that being said, and all the crap our linebackers get about tight end coverage, etc. Our D-Line should be our
main priority this offseason. Get a threat opposite Trent Cole, and a big body next to Bunkley and watch the magic unfold.
I had to get my Andy-food joke in there somewhere.  |
I've been saying the same thing about the four man rush all year. And I think Abiamiri really helps it. He may not be a super DE, but I think the DL plays better as a whole when he is on the field.
I want to see Dixon on the field more, it seems Bunkley has taken him under his wing. I saw him congratulating Dixon after the game when he had that sack. _________________
Thanks to Braylon4MVP for the sig and avy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hockey5djh 
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 4578
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| hexagrams wrote: | | mm6492 wrote: | | jonu62882 wrote: | Yeah, I think this defense is for real. I think they are a Top 10 D. I like that we force a lot fo TO's(with a +12 TO differential).
I think we need to work on our rush D.
I think most of it relies on McDermott and his lack of experience, but I think he'll get there. |
I do not think much of this falls on McDermott
We couldn't cover the TE, get a rush with our front 4, or consistently shut down the run even with JJ and Dawkins here. |
MM is dead on. New guy is the same as the old guy. I don't see a lot of difference in our defense from the last bunch of years. Personnel is mostly the same, scheme is mostly the same, except now our secondary is catching balls instead of knocking them down.
Our Defense is solid, as always. When you blitz as much as we do you are going to get exposed. Lets remember too that the Saints game the offense and special teams gave them the ball twice with a short field. You can't put the Saints score entirely on the defense. |
I think you will start to see the difference over the next couple of offseasons with drafts and FA signings. If you think about it McDermott inherited JJ's defense this season. I do think the trade for Witherspoon shows that McDermott will place a higher value on the LB position.
As far as this years defense and the "Are they for real?" question. I think Nabbs, as normal, hit the nail on the head with this one. Our next three opponents will define this defense. Dallas, SD and Chicago all have some very, very good offensive talents and should be a real test for us. _________________

A Kiltman Sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eagles27 
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 16254 Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Broadway Joe wrote: | | I want to see Dixon on the field more, it seems Bunkley has taken him under his wing. I saw him congratulating Dixon after the game when he had that sack. |
Dixon is playing about as much as a player who doesn't start can. The only way to get him on the field more is to remove Patterson from the starting lineup. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|