| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MrDrew 
 Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 14652 Location: Evil League of Evil
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Waldo wrote: | | MrDrew wrote: | | You'd have a hard time trying to find a better beer in a can. |
LOL, unless you get their Old Chub Scottish Ale, which I have one of in the fridge, and will do a review on later. |
Cheater... I do like Dale's a littler better, but I would never turn down an Old Chub. So I'll rephrase it...
You won't fine better better beers in cans than Oskar Blues & Grill
There, you happy now? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BrettFavre004 
Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 18708 Location: Galesville, WI
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Waldo wrote: | | BrettFavre004 wrote: | Are you going to rate your homebrew Sweet Brown?
How long is that going to take? |
I can.
Browns are fast. The fermenting has slowed down, I'll rack it into the secondary fermenter on Saturday and give it a week to age a bit and clarify, then bottle it after that (in a week and a half). It takes about a week to develop the carbonation, but it won't really be at it's prime for another 4-5 weeks after that, though I'll drink a few prior to when it hit's its prime (though the character of it will change, it'll probably stay in its prime for 1-2 years).
If it turns out good and I have some left, I'll save a few to bring to TJ's when PS starts so you can give it a try.
5 gallons makes about 2 cases (~50 bottles), so I should have some left by then.
I'm probably going to make another batch of a longer beer when I bottle that one, one that takes more than a week in the secondary like a Vanilla Porter or Belgian Golden (~2 months in the secondary is ideal), so I've got one ready to bottle when I run low. |
We would get about 49-52 bottles per batch. We were really limited with our selection, because we couldn't get a range between about 40 and 60, so we could only make the beers that would ferment at higher temperatures. After brewing, it would take us anywhere from 2-6 weeks for fermentation for the ones we made, the longer the better.
I would say we made 6 batches all together, one of those being an Old Fashioned Root Beer, it had a very strong vanilla taste. _________________
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=17 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waldo 
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 22679 Location: The ATL
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BrettFavre004 wrote: | | Waldo wrote: | | BrettFavre004 wrote: | Are you going to rate your homebrew Sweet Brown?
How long is that going to take? |
I can.
Browns are fast. The fermenting has slowed down, I'll rack it into the secondary fermenter on Saturday and give it a week to age a bit and clarify, then bottle it after that (in a week and a half). It takes about a week to develop the carbonation, but it won't really be at it's prime for another 4-5 weeks after that, though I'll drink a few prior to when it hit's its prime (though the character of it will change, it'll probably stay in its prime for 1-2 years).
If it turns out good and I have some left, I'll save a few to bring to TJ's when PS starts so you can give it a try.
5 gallons makes about 2 cases (~50 bottles), so I should have some left by then.
I'm probably going to make another batch of a longer beer when I bottle that one, one that takes more than a week in the secondary like a Vanilla Porter or Belgian Golden (~2 months in the secondary is ideal), so I've got one ready to bottle when I run low. |
We would get about 49-52 bottles per batch. We were really limited with our selection, because we couldn't get a range between about 40 and 60, so we could only make the beers that would ferment at higher temperatures. After brewing, it would take us anywhere from 2-6 weeks for fermentation for the ones we made, the longer the better.
I would say we made 6 batches all together, one of those being an Old Fashioned Root Beer, it had a very strong vanilla taste. |
This time of year there is nothing slowing it down here unless you got a fridge to ferment in. You need a warm weather Ale yeast, even then, a good spot, I've got my carboy on an A/C vent with a towel over it.
In a home temperature of 75 degrees, beer ferments very fast.
For the secondary though, it really depends on the style. Lighter English style Ales don't need much time at all (especially bottle conditioned), the heavier beers take a lot longer. I had one ("The Hammer", 12%+ ABV) in the primary for a week, the secondary for 3 months, and the 3rd stage fermenter for 2 years. _________________
| Title Town USA wrote: | | Waldo was right! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waldo 
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 22679 Location: The ATL
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|

Old Chub Scottish Ale
Best beer that comes in a can.
Old Chub is a domestically brewed Scottish Ale by the Oskar Blues Brewery. Scottish Ale is a really tough style to pin down in description as it can vary so much, being anywhere from a light ale to barley wine strength (Old Chub is strong at 8% ABV), and anywhere from a light beer to a dark beer. Scotch Ales are very malty and only use a minor amount of bittering hops. Basically Scotch Ales are beers brewed from the same grain and largely by the same people (originally) that make Scotch. Scottish brewers are very proud of their grain and have very complex malt profiles, using some of the same techniques as Scotch malt such as floor malting and drying with peat. Aging in oak barrels is not unheard of either. Scotch Ales also use a fairly distinct style of yeast, it ferments fairly clean but leaves slightly smokey hints in the beer. Old Chub is a darker, heavier version of a typical Scotch Ale, but it is not a dark beer. There is a lot of residual sweetness, and overall an explosion of caramelized grain flavor from virtually every part of the spectrum. The hops are practically invisible.
I love the flavor of this beer. Scottish Ale is not a style commonly brewed in America, and most attempts are quite poor. Old Chub IMO is a very good example, really the only good domestic example that I've had. Given a year of aging in Oak, this beer would be incredible. This beer gets the malt right, it is just an explosion of malt flavor, sweet, smokey, nutty, chocolaty, toffee, etc.... Practically every term that can be used to describe malt flavor, this beer has hints of.
I think this beer could stand to sit for a year or two. It has a bit of a green beer flavor, really good heavier Scotch Ales tend to merge the flavors into a multifacted whole. The potential is there, this beer just needs a few years, a few years in oak and this would be crazy good.
Don't let the can scare you, this is really good stuff. Theoretically cans are superior to glass, they don't add a taint and most importantly there are no photoxidation worries, light can have no effect. The drawback is that this beer lacks living yeast (at least I'm pretty sure, I can't image that they can condition it), thus will not age well on its own. Unfortunately.
I really wish America would develop a tradition of really good domestic grain (ours is extremely powerful when it comes to enzyme action and very, very clean tasting, but nothing like the care that is taken with Scottish Malts to develop the flavors) so that we could make beer like this in an American tradition. However our primary domestic beer industry is much more closely aligned with the German brewing traditions than British/Irish/Scottish, yet we have no domestic counterpart to the Dopplebock, the Dopplebock being essentially a Lager version of a Scotch Ale (Scottish Ales are to Pale Ales as Bocks/Dopplebocks are to Pilsners).
Old Chub is one of my favorite domestic beers with national distribution. If you like heavy malty beer, you will love this beer.
Grade - 8.2 _________________
| Title Town USA wrote: | | Waldo was right! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BrettFavre004 
Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 18708 Location: Galesville, WI
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Waldo wrote: | | I had one ("The Hammer", 12%+ ABV) in the primary for a week, the secondary for 3 months, and the 3rd stage fermenter for 2 years. |
We made Belgium High Gravity, I had two on an empty stomach before going out one time, and I was noticeably feeling it. Didn't taste that great, but it also really didn't taste that strong. _________________
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=17 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrDrew 
 Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 14652 Location: Evil League of Evil
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
For those that were wondering what style of beer to pair with the food you're eating, I found this chart. Pretty good way to help make a decision.
http://www.craftbeerandfood.com/pdf/beer_food.pdf _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waldo 
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 22679 Location: The ATL
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Duck Rabbit Brown Ale
My second beer reviewed from the Duck Rabbit Brewery in NC, and the first time I've had it. This is not a traditional Brown Ale, at all. It is hopped nearly as much as an IPA, with the malt schedule of a Brown Ale. This beer is quite bitter and has a lot of hop flavor, in addition the moderately strong taste of the chocolaty malt. If you do not like hoppy beer, you will not like this one. The aroma is of the malt, and is has a deep mahogany color.
I like the malt flavor a lot. The taste of the chocolate malt is very clear and distinct.
Why add so many hops to this? The beer is quite bitter, hop flavor does not go that well with dark malts IMO, the two flavors compete too much and aren't very compatible.
I don't really care for this overall beer all that much. It is basically like mixing an IPA with a sweet Brown, IMO not the two most compatible flavors. But the malt is good tasting and I imagine paired with only lighter malts the hops would be quite good too. This to me embodies the typical thinking of the American "too much of everything" craft brewing movement.
Grade: 4.0 _________________
| Title Town USA wrote: | | Waldo was right! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrDrew 
 Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 14652 Location: Evil League of Evil
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Waldo wrote: |
Why add so many hops to this? The beer is quite bitter, hop flavor does not go that well with dark malts IMO, the two flavors compete too much and aren't very compatible. |
It's not a common thing, but it can be done. I've had a stout that was pretty hoppy, and it actually worked.
I've also had a style called a "Horkey". I was told it was the grandfather to the English brown ales (brown, porter, etc..). It was sweet and malty, with a bitter hoppy finish. It's actually pretty good, and odd at the same time. But I haven't found too many that blend that way. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waldo 
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 22679 Location: The ATL
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Lagunitas Lucky 13
Lagunitas is a dometic brewery located in California. Lucky 13 is dubbed as a "mondo large" Red Ale offering by them. Red Ales are related to, but different than Brown Ales, using roasted barley, not deeply caramelized malt, to develop the color and flavor. Red Ale is the traditional beer associated with Ireland. Unfortunately it is a style that isn't brewed very much by craft brewers, for some odd reason, I'm not sure why. It is a very good, refreshing, and drinkable style, with loads of flavor. This version uses more hops than a typical version, using a moderate amount of both bittering and flavoring hops, and a small amount of aroma hops (a nice touch that is rarely seen in commercially produced beer, kudos). The malt flavor can best be described with one word. Butterscotch. The aftertaste is basically a Werthers Original candy. This one is very strong (8.3% abv).
I love the malt flavor of this beer. Smooth, sweet butterscotch. It is very strong and very notable.
I think that it is slightly overhopped. The butterscotch flavor is IMO the featured flavor, nothing should detract from it as it is so well done. The hops are a tad overdone.
Really, really well done Red Ale. Red Ale is such an interesting style, it is incredibly good for how rarely it is made. Which is odd as it is an ez beer that is very simple to brew. This is probably my favorite domestic Red, though Sam Adams makes a very good version as well (Killians is terrible when viewed as a Red Ale)(I've had homebrewed versions that put everything else to shame, by a longshot, this is a commonly done style by homebrewers).
Grade: 7.5 _________________
| Title Town USA wrote: | | Waldo was right! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ienjoythesnow 
Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 4377
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Waldo wrote: | Lagunitas Lucky 13
|
Nice selection waldo, I love lucky 13, lagunitas in general has never made a beer i didn't like, they get you drunk incredibly fast and they taste delicious. I'll be reviewing hop stoopid the next chance i get. _________________
RaiderX with the assist^^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrDrew 
 Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 14652 Location: Evil League of Evil
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Mamas Little Yella Pils
Brewer: Oskar Blues Grill & Brew
Style Pilsner
My Review:
Another beer in a can, and yet another winner by Oskar Blues. Pours clear, and deep yellow (pee colored). White head started at about two fingers, and slowly diminished through the glass. Good carbonation, and decent lacing. Scent is heavy malts, that give a bread scent, grapefruit, light grass, and light pine. Taste is essentially the same, sweet malts, light bread, pine, grapefruit, and light grass from the hops in the middle, and a light bitter finish.
Everything I was hoping for last time I bought a Pilsner. Light and crisp, very refreshing. The hops make their presence known, but don't overpower the malt. Great for the first time they put a lager in a can.
Tech:
| Oskarblues.com wrote: | Mama’s is made with hearty amounts of pale malt, German specialty malts, and traditional (Saaz) and 21st century Bavarian hops.
Our first canned lager, it’s also fermented at cool temperatures with a German yeast. While it’s rich with Czeched-out flavor, Mama’s gentle hopping (about 35 IBUs) and low ABV (just 5.3%) makes it a luxurious but low-dose beer. |
Wish the could have put this on the can
| Oskarblues.com wrote: | | Sadly, the Feds rejected our “Take Two and Call Us in the Morning” line on the can. |
My Score: 8.1 _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waldo 
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 22679 Location: The ATL
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Boy I look at that stuff every time I stop to the store and think to myself.....should I.....
Apparently I should. I stop tomorrow, so that'll be my weekend purchase. _________________
| Title Town USA wrote: | | Waldo was right! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BLick12 
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Posts: 23662 Location: South Jeezy fo sheezy
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Just had some of the Sam Adams Summer Ale last night and I'd say your rating is spot on. _________________
| johndeere1707 wrote: |
Another Ginger QB in the AFC North.
Looking forward to the "No Soul Bowl" twice a year
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waldo 
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 22679 Location: The ATL
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Waldo wrote: | | BrettFavre004 wrote: | | Waldo wrote: | | BrettFavre004 wrote: | Are you going to rate your homebrew Sweet Brown?
How long is that going to take? |
I can.
Browns are fast. The fermenting has slowed down, I'll rack it into the secondary fermenter on Saturday and give it a week to age a bit and clarify, then bottle it after that (in a week and a half). It takes about a week to develop the carbonation, but it won't really be at it's prime for another 4-5 weeks after that, though I'll drink a few prior to when it hit's its prime (though the character of it will change, it'll probably stay in its prime for 1-2 years).
If it turns out good and I have some left, I'll save a few to bring to TJ's when PS starts so you can give it a try.
5 gallons makes about 2 cases (~50 bottles), so I should have some left by then.
I'm probably going to make another batch of a longer beer when I bottle that one, one that takes more than a week in the secondary like a Vanilla Porter or Belgian Golden (~2 months in the secondary is ideal), so I've got one ready to bottle when I run low. |
We would get about 49-52 bottles per batch. We were really limited with our selection, because we couldn't get a range between about 40 and 60, so we could only make the beers that would ferment at higher temperatures. After brewing, it would take us anywhere from 2-6 weeks for fermentation for the ones we made, the longer the better.
I would say we made 6 batches all together, one of those being an Old Fashioned Root Beer, it had a very strong vanilla taste. |
This time of year there is nothing slowing it down here unless you got a fridge to ferment in. You need a warm weather Ale yeast, even then, a good spot, I've got my carboy on an A/C vent with a towel over it.
In a home temperature of 75 degrees, beer ferments very fast.
For the secondary though, it really depends on the style. Lighter English style Ales don't need much time at all (especially bottle conditioned), the heavier beers take a lot longer. I had one ("The Hammer", 12%+ ABV) in the primary for a week, the secondary for 3 months, and the 3rd stage fermenter for 2 years. |
Just got done racking it into the secondary. Filled 'er up to the top, I got a full 5 gallons. 6 days after brewing. Next weekend I'm gonna bottle it. _________________
| Title Town USA wrote: | | Waldo was right! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrDrew 
 Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 14652 Location: Evil League of Evil
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Deep Cover Brown Ale
Brewer: Left Hand Brewing Company (Longmont, CO)
Style: Brown Ale
My Review:
Pours a deep, clear, brown, with a reddish hue. A little foam to start, but it disappeared quick. A lot of carbonation. Scent was chocolate, and slight malt. Taste was watery to start and finished with chocolate. Not much on the flavor front at all.
I became really disappointed as I waited for the flavor to come. It never did. This is the first Left Hand beer that I didn't like. It wasn't horrible, but it didn't impress me at all. I'll finish the 4 that I got in the mixed 12 pack, but I don't see myself drinking this again.
My Score: 3.5 _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|