You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum.
This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.

Yarly · Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 35

What would you guys think about trading our number 3 pick to Dallas for DeMarcus Ware?

I'm not sure on what it would take to get him. He's relatively young and has already established himself as one of the elite linebackers in the NFL.

Could be get him for our 1st (Pick 3) and our 3rd (Pick 67)?

I feel like he would be a great building block for a 3-4 defense.

What do you guys think? I'm sort of just throwing this out there.

MOSteelers56 · Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:35 pm Post subject:

That is a good idea if the Chiefs are thinking of taking a OLB with the pick. If they are not thinking OLB I think the best pick at 3 is Raji.

Then again you could make the trade and hope for Brace to drop. I think they will both be good NT's.
_________________

Deadpulse on the sig

harrisonbl · Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 185 Location: Liberty, MO

kennystatus · Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 1952 Location: Overtime

MOSteelers56 · Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:40 pm Post subject: Re: DeMarcus Ware Trade

bigballin · Joined: 05 Jan 2009 Posts: 2965 Location: Air Force Academy

MATHIAS KIWANUKA!!! Can play either RE in 4-3 or OLB in 3-4!!! Filled in quite nicely for Osi U.

Bleed Red · Joined: 17 Sep 2008 Posts: 2413 Location: Wichita

I would give a first and a 3rd for D ware. He is one of the best players in the league right now.
_________________

KCWolf1 · Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 7794 Location: KC

The Cowboys wouldn't ever trade him. He's too valuable to them.

And Yarly, your avatar is too big. Max size allowed is 80 pixels x 80 pixels.
_________________

RedandGold · Joined: 02 Dec 2005 Posts: 5579

nicfre2006 · Joined: 06 Nov 2006 Posts: 3325

With so many holes on our roster, why would we trade two picks for one player? At this point Ware is not going to put our defense over the top. And I think people are jumping on the 3-4 bandwagon WAYYYY too early. I have no clue where people are getting this from. The Adam Schefter article I have seen posted in made a completely speculative comment about the 3-4.

jimmydee · Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 1892

I'm of the same opinion as Nic. As young as we are, and as unsettled or not yet clearly defined on defense, and with our current personnel, we are uniquely capable to go 34, 43, or some hybrid.

We'll need to add a player or two to have success with what ever we do, but I think our inexperience, in this particular case, could be a positive.

See, I found the Pony.

With our personnel, we have flexability, and it should help us tremendously in the draft.
_________________
season ticket holder from 1977-92. Personal friends with many retired chiefs. Great times.

me227 · Joined: 09 Jan 2007 Posts: 1039

I hate to tell you but Ware is untouchable. Why would Dallas do this? Realistically can you explain to me why we would do this?. This reminds me of the guy a few years back who wanted to trade Dante Hall for the 4th overall pick 2 years ago.
_________________

2011 Dallas Cowboys Pick 'Em Champion

valkrei · Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 5088

Broncos_OTM · Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:45 pm Post subject: Re: DeMarcus Ware Trade

Yarly · Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 35

Thanks for the feedback... I am still trying to get a feel for players values and stuff like that.

Sorry about the sig size i fixed it.