You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum.
This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.


 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

The Draft Final...

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Pittsburgh Steelers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kysteeler


Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 855
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:02 pm    Post subject: The Draft Final... Reply with quote

The Steelers trade KC to 23 and pick up a 3rd


1. Anthony Spencer DE/OL
2. Marcus McCauley CB
3. Tim Shaw ILB
3. Manuel Ramirez OG
4. Antwan Barnes LB
4. Samson Satele C
5. Rhema Mcknight WR
5. Jackie Battle RB
6. Walter Thomas DT
7. Kurt Quarterman OG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
STELRFAN


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 3782
Location: Fortress of Solitude
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:07 am    Post subject: hmm Reply with quote

3rd round is too high for tim shaw
_________________

UML-Redskins GM GoSkins

Jamal Lewis seems to be a real uphill runner now. That's a problem. Downhill runners are preferred. Maybe he is running in the wrong direction. Espn DJ Gallo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gseabrook26


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 1961
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not great, not bad though.
I like Spencer in that trade down a lot, wouldn't mind MaCauley, and I like both Battle and Thomas.
Don't really like Shaw and Ramirez though. Just my opinion though.


Last edited by gseabrook26 on Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:41 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spush


Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 13981
Location: On top of the world
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:24 am    Post subject: Re: hmm Reply with quote

STELRFAN wrote:
3rd round is too high for tim shaw


Move Shaw to McKnights spot and get a better 3rd round WR and I like it.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ktfuehrer


Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 259
Location: Vancouver, WA
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like it! Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
STELRFAN


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 3782
Location: Fortress of Solitude
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:29 am    Post subject: Re: The Draft Final... Reply with quote

kysteeler wrote:
The Steelers trade KC to 23 and pick up a 3rd


1. Anthony Spencer DE/OL
2. Marcus McCauley CB
3. Tim Shaw ILB
3. Manuel Ramirez OG
4. Antwan Barnes LB
4. Samson Satele C
5. Rhema Mcknight WR
5. Jackie Battle RB
6. Walter Thomas DT
7. Kurt Quarterman OG


Replace 7 with a punter, replace 3 with a decent wr and this draft is ok and replace mckknight with a lb we have enough pass dropping wr
_________________

UML-Redskins GM GoSkins

Jamal Lewis seems to be a real uphill runner now. That's a problem. Downhill runners are preferred. Maybe he is running in the wrong direction. Espn DJ Gallo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AlanFanecaFan


Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 11530
Location: Keeping bad people where they belong
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You guys ever think that maybe that was his prediction?

Not what you guys want?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gseabrook26


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 1961
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

AlanFanecaFan wrote:
You guys ever think that maybe that was his prediction?

Not what you guys want?

Why would he have posted it on here if he didn't want us to comment on it? For the most part people have been giving some positive feed back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AlanFanecaFan


Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 11530
Location: Keeping bad people where they belong
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gseabrook26 wrote:
AlanFanecaFan wrote:
You guys ever think that maybe that was his prediction?

Not what you guys want?

Why would he have posted it on here if he didn't want us to comment on it? For the most part people have been giving some positive feed back.


Your missing my point. He wanted feedback. Just not on the angle of that is what he wants. Its what he predicts.(Maybe or like you said, what he hopes happens, IDK)

Its like me: I predict we'll pick Timmons. I dotn want him, I want Anderson, but I think he'll be gone and we'll pick Timmons.

See what I mean.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gseabrook26


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 1961
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

AlanFanecaFan wrote:
gseabrook26 wrote:
AlanFanecaFan wrote:
You guys ever think that maybe that was his prediction?

Not what you guys want?

Why would he have posted it on here if he didn't want us to comment on it? For the most part people have been giving some positive feed back.


Your missing my point. He wanted feedback. Just not on the angle of that is what he wants. Its what he predicts.(Maybe or like you said, what he hopes happens, IDK)

Its like me: I predict we'll pick Timmons. I dotn want him, I want Anderson, but I think he'll be gone and we'll pick Timmons.

See what I mean.

Well if he posted it on here he had to expect all kinds of different feed back. Who is to say this type of feed back isn't what he wanted? You're saying it like it can't be what he wanted.
Whether he's just predicting or saying who he wants, can we not say that Tim Shaw is not worth a 3rd round (for example)? If I was doing a mock and I was just trying to predict how our draft will go and I had picks out of place (a 5th round talent in the 2nd round for example) I would hope that people tell me the guy is not worth the pick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
STELRFAN


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 3782
Location: Fortress of Solitude
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:58 am    Post subject: hmm Reply with quote

He wanted feedback like this guy maybe not in the third but in the fifth now if they take shaw in the 5th i wouldnt be happy but also not upset but if they take him in the third i might break the tv i will protest outside heinz field
_________________

UML-Redskins GM GoSkins

Jamal Lewis seems to be a real uphill runner now. That's a problem. Downhill runners are preferred. Maybe he is running in the wrong direction. Espn DJ Gallo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AlanFanecaFan


Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 11530
Location: Keeping bad people where they belong
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gseabrook26 wrote:
AlanFanecaFan wrote:
gseabrook26 wrote:
AlanFanecaFan wrote:
You guys ever think that maybe that was his prediction?

Not what you guys want?

Why would he have posted it on here if he didn't want us to comment on it? For the most part people have been giving some positive feed back.


Your missing my point. He wanted feedback. Just not on the angle of that is what he wants. Its what he predicts.(Maybe or like you said, what he hopes happens, IDK)

Its like me: I predict we'll pick Timmons. I dotn want him, I want Anderson, but I think he'll be gone and we'll pick Timmons.

See what I mean.

Well if he posted it on here he had to expect all kinds of different feed back. Who is to say this type of feed back isn't what he wanted? You're saying it like it can't be what he wanted.
Whether he's just predicting or saying who he wants, can we not say that Tim Shaw is not worth a 3rd round (for example)? If I was doing a mock and I was just trying to predict how our draft will go and I had picks out of place (a 5th round talent in the 2nd round for example) I would hope that people tell me the guy is not worth the pick.


1)Again missing my point. Maybe he wanted you guys opinion on the draft if this happened, not Shaw is only a 4th rounder or later picks. But to each their own.

2)Its not that big of a deal anyways.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kysteeler


Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 855
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well to answer the questions this is what i think will happen in the draft if Anderson is gone when we pick.


1. Anthony Spencer DE/OL -I actually really like him but thats just me, wouldn't mind timmons

2. Marcus McCauley CB -I think he could help us out a lot

3. Tim Shaw ILB -Maybe a little high but i couldn't think of who to place here but I think it will be a LB

3. Manuel Ramirez OG -One of the strongest guards in the draft

4. Antwan Barnes LB -Great linebacker IMO could be good on ST and play inside or out

4. Samson Satele C -Just wanted to add some depth here

5. Rhema Mcknight WR -I really like him and he had a good year last yr and has nice size.

5. Jackie Battle RB -Know a lot of ppl like him here

6. Walter Thomas DT -Love how big he is and could help us in 4-3 maybe?

7. Kurt Quarterman OG -I'm from ky so i have to go with someone from here lol

I feel that we don't need a day one WR because next year will def be the year to get a big WR... Sweed from Texas, Mario Urrutia of Louisville, Gregg Carr of FSU, and Malcolm Kelly of Oklahoma.

I like to hear a lot of feedback though bc I like to know what and how other fans are thinking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Pittsburgh Steelers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group