You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum.
This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.


 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

2017 NFL Draft Thread: News & Rumors
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 78, 79, 80
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> New York Jets
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NewAge


Joined: 01 Sep 2014
Posts: 18418
Location: el ramster on the sig
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really hope that Clark, Jones, and Coleman can be this year's version of last year's WR group.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bianconero


Joined: 13 Jul 2013
Posts: 5586
Location: Polo Lounge
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, so we didn't trade Sheldon or Pryor
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NewAge


Joined: 01 Sep 2014
Posts: 18418
Location: el ramster on the sig
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bianconero wrote:
Okay, so we didn't trade Sheldon or Pryor

yet

According to Manish, Dallas and Washington were both interested in Sheldon.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Harris Smith


Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 1707
Location: Totowa, NJ
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had to go in to work this afternoon and was loosely following events. I'm still trying to figure out what went on today​.Just seems crazy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bianconero


Joined: 13 Jul 2013
Posts: 5586
Location: Polo Lounge
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you're highlighted in green, then we're expecting you to be a building block and leader of this defense:

CB: Burris (23) / Williams (26) / Clark (R)

S: Adams (R) / Middleton (23)

LB: Lee (22)

DE: Wilkerson (27)
NT: Simon (26)
DT: Williams (22) / Thomas (23)

EDGE: Richardson (26) / Mauldin (24) / Jones (22) / Donahue (R)

LB: Harris (33)

S: Maye (R) / Pryor (24)

3: Skrine (28)

CB: Claiborne (27) / Roberts (26) / Jones (R)

Not bad
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NewAge


Joined: 01 Sep 2014
Posts: 18418
Location: el ramster on the sig
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bianconero wrote:
If you're highlighted in green, then we're expecting you to be a building block and leader of this defense:

CB: Burris (23) / Williams (26) / Clark (R)

S: Adams (R) / Middleton (23)

LB: Lee (22)

DE: Wilkerson (27)
NT: Simon (26)
DT: Williams (22) / Thomas (23)

EDGE: Richardson (26) / Mauldin (24) / Jones (22) / Donahue (R)

LB: Harris (33)

S: Maye (R) / Pryor (24)

3: Skrine (2Cool

CB: Claiborne (27) / Roberts (26) / Jones (R)

Not bad

Connor Jones is an inside guy but yep.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jonyankee1nyj


Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 11165
Location: The only Jazz Fan in New England...
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bianconero wrote:
If you're highlighted in green, then we're expecting you to be a building block and leader of this defense:

CB: Burris (23) / Williams (26) / Clark (R)

S: Adams (R) / Middleton (23)

LB: Lee (22)

DE: Wilkerson (27)
NT: Simon (26)
DT: Williams (22) / Thomas (23)

EDGE: Richardson (26) / Mauldin (24) / Jones (22) / Donahue (R)

LB: Harris (33)

S: Maye (R) / Pryor (24)

3: Skrine (28)

CB: Claiborne (27) / Roberts (26) / Jones (R)

Not bad


Eh there is potential there but hardly solid. Richardson out of position is probably going to be hard to count on as a building block unfortunately. I like some of the talent but there are a lot of un proven players and this is the side of the ball that's considered a strength. I'm okay with the tank though.
_________________

Soaring Jets Wall of Honor Member
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jetsfandan423


Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 18186
Location: Greensboro, NC
PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If Adams was off the board, Cimini said Howard would have been our pick. I would have been fine with that, still glad we got Adams though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
jetskid007


Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 10873
PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jetsfandan423 wrote:
If Adams was off the board, Cimini said Howard would have been our pick. I would have been fine with that, still glad we got Adams though.



Crazy when you think about it. Could've gone 6 had the Bears/49ers taken Adams, ends up going 19th.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KingOfTheDot


Joined: 15 Oct 2013
Posts: 10661
Location: JetLife Stadium
PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jetskid007 wrote:
Jetsfandan423 wrote:
If Adams was off the board, Cimini said Howard would have been our pick. I would have been fine with that, still glad we got Adams though.



Crazy when you think about it. Could've gone 6 had the Bears/49ers taken Adams, ends up going 19th.


With the Macc operated his trade backs I think we would have moved back in all honestly.
_________________
#LeahStrong

Quote:
@CRO31: @KellenWinslowJr you wish you were as good as your dad. Have you been to TARGET lately?


NewAge wrote:
And yeah I like Butt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ekill08x


Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 10758
Location: Bayport, New York
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2017 12:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KingOfTheDot wrote:
jetskid007 wrote:
Jetsfandan423 wrote:
If Adams was off the board, Cimini said Howard would have been our pick. I would have been fine with that, still glad we got Adams though.



Crazy when you think about it. Could've gone 6 had the Bears/49ers taken Adams, ends up going 19th.


With the Macc operated his trade backs I think we would have moved back in all honestly.


Yeah because he would have moved back for a 4th.
_________________


Props to JMG on the sig as usual
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Malik


Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 8743
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2017 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ekill08x wrote:
KingOfTheDot wrote:
jetskid007 wrote:
Jetsfandan423 wrote:
If Adams was off the board, Cimini said Howard would have been our pick. I would have been fine with that, still glad we got Adams though.



Crazy when you think about it. Could've gone 6 had the Bears/49ers taken Adams, ends up going 19th.


With the Macc operated his trade backs I think we would have moved back in all honestly.


Yeah because he would have moved back for a 4th.


Eh, joke or not this did continue to show that Macc gets poor value back consistently. There's yet to have been a trade or contract where it feels like Macc "won."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KingOfTheDot


Joined: 15 Oct 2013
Posts: 10661
Location: JetLife Stadium
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2017 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ekill08x wrote:
KingOfTheDot wrote:
jetskid007 wrote:
Jetsfandan423 wrote:
If Adams was off the board, Cimini said Howard would have been our pick. I would have been fine with that, still glad we got Adams though.



Crazy when you think about it. Could've gone 6 had the Bears/49ers taken Adams, ends up going 19th.


With the Macc operated his trade backs I think we would have moved back in all honestly.


Yeah because he would have moved back for a 4th.


Can't believe you're still salty
_________________
#LeahStrong

Quote:
@CRO31: @KellenWinslowJr you wish you were as good as your dad. Have you been to TARGET lately?


NewAge wrote:
And yeah I like Butt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
xenajets


Joined: 31 Mar 2012
Posts: 2103
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2017 10:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Malik wrote:
ekill08x wrote:
KingOfTheDot wrote:
jetskid007 wrote:
Jetsfandan423 wrote:
If Adams was off the board, Cimini said Howard would have been our pick. I would have been fine with that, still glad we got Adams though.



Crazy when you think about it. Could've gone 6 had the Bears/49ers taken Adams, ends up going 19th.


With the Macc operated his trade backs I think we would have moved back in all honestly.


Yeah because he would have moved back for a 4th.


Eh, joke or not this did continue to show that Macc gets poor value back consistently. There's yet to have been a trade or contract where it feels like Macc "won."


Marshall for a fifth was decent after his first year to be fair
_________________


Many thanks to IDOG_det on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rdelaney89


Joined: 22 Jan 2009
Posts: 3842
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2017 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Malik wrote:
ekill08x wrote:
KingOfTheDot wrote:
jetskid007 wrote:
Jetsfandan423 wrote:
If Adams was off the board, Cimini said Howard would have been our pick. I would have been fine with that, still glad we got Adams though.



Crazy when you think about it. Could've gone 6 had the Bears/49ers taken Adams, ends up going 19th.


With the Macc operated his trade backs I think we would have moved back in all honestly.


Yeah because he would have moved back for a 4th.


Eh, joke or not this did continue to show that Macc gets poor value back consistently. There's yet to have been a trade or contract where it feels like Macc "won."

I'd argue the Marshall trade was brilliant. I'm a big fan of Wilks deal, gave us an option to decide between him and Sheldon. People will complain about the Fitz deal because of the money but Macc didn't budge on multiple years, I'll call that more of a wash. The only really bad deal was Revis and then not signing snacks. Everything else has made us pretty flexible
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> New York Jets All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 78, 79, 80
Page 80 of 80

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group