Joined: 10 Mar 2014 Posts: 313 Location: Appleton, WI
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:25 am Post subject:
People are nuts if they think it's a good idea for us to get Sherman.
1. He wouldn't be able to do what he does in Seattle if he played here. Therefore, he means more to Seattle and a lot of other teams than he does to us.
2. He is 29 years old. Don't say, "We got Woodson at 30," we signed Woodson at 30. There's a significant difference. Additionally, Woodson was a sub 4.4 prospect, and Sherman was barely a sub 4.6 prospect. Woodson thrived in every single role he was put in. Sherman wouldn't.
3. It would cost us more than it would cost other teams. Unless people here actually think that the Seahawks would trade their best player of the last 7 years to their biggest conference rival over the past 7 years.
4. Seahawks want a player plus a high pick. Where's that player coming from? You want to give up OL and then our first? WR? Damarious Randall? Who are we giving up, and is a high pick a first or a second?
I think some people don't think.
Comparing the two is laughable. I completely agree that Sherman will not age well.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum