| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CriminalMind
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 8623
Location: Toronto, CA
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:44 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I am confident that between Jack and Derek, CP will have his best year, this coming year.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bermuda Viking
Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 5292
Location: Paget, Bermuda
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CriminalMind wrote: | | I am confident that between Jack and Derek, CP will have his best year, this coming year. |
I'm thinking he will do very well also. Great spot for him. I don't think 1000 yds receiving but 1000yds combined and 6 TD's behind that line.
_________________
I love the Vikings, win or lose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SemperFeist
Joined: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 7914
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I still don't see Patterson being anything higher than the #4 receiver on Oakland's roster.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VikeManDan
Joined: 22 Dec 2010
Posts: 3281
Location: Minnesota
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Damn, that's a bummer about CP. Was really hoping we could've worked something out with him as I think he would've done well in a Shurmur O. Best of luck in Oakland CP.
_________________
"My purpose will not be denied."
- Teddy Bridgewater 9/1/16 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Virginia Viking
Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 3755
Location: Winchester, VA
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SemperFeist wrote: | | I still don't see Patterson being anything higher than the #4 receiver on Oakland's roster. |
I agree. He will always...barring injury...be a great special teams guy. As a receiver, his ceiling, in my opinion, is Bernard Barrian. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gopherwrestler
Joined: 20 Jan 2014
Posts: 5571
Location: 'Sota
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Virginia Viking wrote: | | SemperFeist wrote: | | I still don't see Patterson being anything higher than the #4 receiver on Oakland's roster. |
I agree. He will always...barring injury...be a great special teams guy. As a receiver, his ceiling, in my opinion, is Bernard Barrian. |
Well to be fair that means he is a #1 option for back to back years for 2 different teams.. He can be that?
He was fine until Peterson, Rice, and Havin became relevant.
_________________
“Once you’ve wrestled, everything else in life is easy.”
-Dan Gable |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Virginia Viking
Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 3755
Location: Winchester, VA
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| gopherwrestler wrote: | | Virginia Viking wrote: | | SemperFeist wrote: | | I still don't see Patterson being anything higher than the #4 receiver on Oakland's roster. |
I agree. He will always...barring injury...be a great special teams guy. As a receiver, his ceiling, in my opinion, is Bernard Barrian. |
Well to be fair that means he is a #1 option for back to back years for 2 different teams.. He can be that?
He was fine until Peterson, Rice, and Havin became relevant. |
I think he CAN be that guy, but not over a career. He's not a guy that's going to make his offense better by just being on the field. He CAN be competent, and flash brilliance on rare occasions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bermuda Viking
Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 5292
Location: Paget, Bermuda
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Virginia Viking wrote: | | gopherwrestler wrote: | | Virginia Viking wrote: | | SemperFeist wrote: | | I still don't see Patterson being anything higher than the #4 receiver on Oakland's roster. |
I agree. He will always...barring injury...be a great special teams guy. As a receiver, his ceiling, in my opinion, is Bernard Barrian. |
Well to be fair that means he is a #1 option for back to back years for 2 different teams.. He can be that?
He was fine until Peterson, Rice, and Havin became relevant. |
I think he CAN be that guy, but not over a career. He's not a guy that's going to make his offense better by just being on the field. He CAN be competent, and flash brilliance on rare occasions. |
I concur. He is a flash in a way. We need more. He will be better in Oakland than here.
_________________
I love the Vikings, win or lose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vike daddy
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 82918
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Per a source with knowledge of the [Oakland] contract, Patterson will get $5 million guaranteed under the deal, with a $2.5 million signing bonus and a $2.5 million guaranteed base salary. The base deal also includes a $250,000 workout bonus in 2017.
The potential upside comes from the ability to void the two-year contract to one year (it voids if he has 65 catches or participates in 65 percent of the offensive snaps), and the incentives package for year one.
As to incentives, Patterson gets $350,000 for 55 percent playing time, another $350,000 or 70 percent playing time, $350,000 for 55 receptions, and another $350,000 for 70 total receptions. There’s also a $350,000 incentive for making it to the Pro Bowl, which could happen easily as a kick returner.
So if Patterson participates in 70 percent of the snaps, catches 70 passes, and makes it to the Pro Bowl, he’ll make $7 million in 2017 — and he’ll hit the market again in 2018.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/03/14/5-million-guaranteed-for-cordarrelle-patterson/
_________________
Everson Griffen: “We can be special. But it’s up to us.” |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bermuda Viking
Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 5292
Location: Paget, Bermuda
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vike daddy wrote: | Per a source with knowledge of the [Oakland] contract, Patterson will get $5 million guaranteed under the deal, with a $2.5 million signing bonus and a $2.5 million guaranteed base salary. The base deal also includes a $250,000 workout bonus in 2017.
The potential upside comes from the ability to void the two-year contract to one year (it voids if he has 65 catches or participates in 65 percent of the offensive snaps), and the incentives package for year one.
As to incentives, Patterson gets $350,000 for 55 percent playing time, another $350,000 or 70 percent playing time, $350,000 for 55 receptions, and another $350,000 for 70 total receptions. There’s also a $350,000 incentive for making it to the Pro Bowl, which could happen easily as a kick returner.
So if Patterson participates in 70 percent of the snaps, catches 70 passes, and makes it to the Pro Bowl, he’ll make $7 million in 2017 — and he’ll hit the market again in 2018.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/03/14/5-million-guaranteed-for-cordarrelle-patterson/ |
For our team no thanks!
_________________
I love the Vikings, win or lose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vike daddy
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 82918
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Cearbhall wrote: | My two cents on Patterson: It would have been foolish to give him the kind of money that the Raiders gave him. I am very happy for Patterson that he was able to get that from Raiders and even more happy that the Vikings didn't try to compete with that offer.
Patterson is no better than the #3 WR in MN. He may not even be that. Looking at successful teams around the league, they just don't invest that many cap collars into a #3 WR. For example, look at the third highest paid WR on all 12 of the teams that went to the playoffs.
Teams have to overpay for players in free agency. Given this reality, it is wise to save those cap dollars for truly elite players.
Free agency is very exciting, but successful teams are the product of solid cap management and consistently good drafting. The Vikings already took it in the shorts on the draft with Patterson. It is good they didn't double down on the mistake by hurting the cap by resigning him too.
It sucks losing Patterson, but letting him go to a deal like the Raiders gave him is absolutely the correct move for both Patterson and for the Vikings. |
_________________
Everson Griffen: “We can be special. But it’s up to us.” |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robb_K
Joined: 30 Aug 2011
Posts: 638
Location: Oude Niedorp, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I hate to see him go. He could have helped The Vikings short and shorter mid-range passing game,as an extra option, and would have broken away several times for big gains. Too bad other teams were willing to pay him more. The Vikings need to upgrade the #3 or 4 WR, unless Treadwell breaks out big this season.
_________________
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/9633/av5e.jpg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vikingsrule
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 52612
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Robb_K wrote: | | I hate to see him go. He could have helped The Vikings short and shorter mid-range passing game,as an extra option, and would have broken away several times for big gains. Too bad other teams were willing to pay him more. The Vikings need to upgrade the #3 or 4 WR, unless Treadwell breaks out big this season. |
Unfortunately, didn't seem like he had many big gains on offense. His receiving average was abysmal last year.
I don't think MN will miss Patterson on offense. He will be missed severely on special teams, though I think Sherels will be fine at KR.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
disaacs
Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 28515
Location: Brownbackistan
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I must be the only one who's concerned about Cordarrelle in an organization of coaches who have a history of lack of discipline. I'm not sure Oakland is a better place for him than here. But, I still wish him well.
_________________
Thx to Lil Uno! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
