The more I think about it...

WaterBear56 · Joined: 26 Jul 2010 Posts: 3313

At the end of the day, in spite of having a worst offensive line and running game compared to his rookie season, Tannehill was substantially better.

I think his next step in the growing process is to connect with Mike Wallace. If they had connected deep in any one of our many close losses, we would have been in the playoffs playing a Bengals team we beat during the season.

Therefore, while I would understand the decision to draft another QB, I would strongly disagree with it.

dolphinologist · Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 5626 Location: New York

bpastermack · Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 13891

Best Case scenario (assuming Aaron Donald doesn't fall to us) would be to trade down to the top of the second round and pick up an extra first round pick in nexet years draft. That would allow us to focus on fixing the team around Tannehill, but give us the firepower to move up in next year's draft to get the QB we want if Tannehill struggles or doesn't take the next step. But that's easier said than done.
_________________

ViolentMonk71 · Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:31 pm Post subject:

I am not touching QB unless it is in the 5th round or later…you ride or die with Tannehill this season.

Tannehill has all the tools to succeed and has done a remarkable job considering the circumstances he has had to play under since entering the NFL. I would focus on using those early picks on guys who can help the team regardless of who is QB. OL and LB are the most dire areas that should be addressed with the first 4 rounds.
_________________

green4gulf · Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:37 pm Post subject:

I don't have an issue with anyone's particular opinion on this topic, but I feel that with QB being such a position of importance if a significant upgrade is available teams should take it.

I think Manziel and Bortles would be upgrades over Tannehill.........not sure about Bridgewater though.

cddolphin · Joined: 23 Mar 2009 Posts: 12450 Location: Florida

I'm in the "Tannehill is our guy this season and needs to be supported by his teammates and coaches" camp.

He had an underrated season with the worst offensive line in the NFL and a not-so-great OC.
_________________
huzzah

Dolphinemidget · Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 4187 Location: Florida

I am all in on Tanney, he needs another couple seasons before I would pull the plug. But would not be against draft Murray from Georgia in round 5+ and groom him. Face islt Moore is a good back up but we can grab a cheap one who can do the sa.e thing. He may also be a diamond in the rough. But a QB to push Tanney, no not on that wave. He needs support after taking the most hits/sacks last season. He has earned his spot this season.
_________________

Adopt a Phins 2016 #1 pick

bpastermack · Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 13891

ovaw8lover · Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 9327 Location: Dolphins Stadium

I think Tannehill is making progress BUT if Aaron Murray is there in the 5th round Miami has to take him. They have too.
_________________
"Yesterday Is History, Tomorrow Is A Mystery, And Today Is A Gift. That Is Why It Is Called The Present.""
— — Master Oogway from Kung Fu Panda

cddolphin · Joined: 23 Mar 2009 Posts: 12450 Location: Florida

ViolentMonk71 · Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:46 am Post subject:

TheKillerNacho · Joined: 10 Feb 2008 Posts: 15007 Location: Pennsylvania

Wait until next year, in my opinion. That QB class looks pretty deep and Tannehill deserves one more year. I wouldn't mind grabbing a guy in the mid rounds, but not sooner. This roster has too many holes.
_________________
With much cheese,

Nacho Simulation Football League

ovaw8lover · Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Posts: 9327 Location: Dolphins Stadium

bpastermack · Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 13891

ViolentMonk71 · Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 2:22 pm Post subject: