Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Bulldog's "you are going to hate this" mock
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cleveland Browns
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mistakebytehlak


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 44841
Location: Brooklyn, NY
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

its time for a new kicker when your coach goes for a pooch punt instead of a 51 yard field goal...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
buno67


Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 31091
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mistakebytehlak wrote:
its time for a new kicker when your coach goes for a pooch punt instead of a 51 yard field goal...


Its not like he has missed a 50 yard kick this year. He is 2/2 from 50+ with both those kicks being 51 yarders.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
mistakebytehlak


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 44841
Location: Brooklyn, NY
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

buno67 wrote:
mistakebytehlak wrote:
its time for a new kicker when your coach goes for a pooch punt instead of a 51 yard field goal...


Its not like he has missed a 50 yard kick this year. He is 2/2 from 50+ with both those kicks being 51 yarders.


he's 7/25 for his career, and his coach elected to go for a pooch punt when we needed those 3 points.

yeah, time to get a new kicker.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mistakebytehlak


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 44841
Location: Brooklyn, NY
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bulldog wrote:
Dropkick_pride wrote:
Estonianzulu wrote:
Well, its safe to say you nailed it with the thread title.


Ditto.


Its ok. Most people don't like different. And I can't stand seeing the same mock drafts over and over again. Which is why I hardly ever comment on them. B/c they are usually the same as the other guy who just made one yesterday except for a player or two.


just because its different, doesn't mean its good. sometimes consensus is the way to go. pretty sure we all know we need to get a qb. we all know that our O is lagging behind our D and we need another weapon or two. Those have to be done, and there will likely be high draft picks that will help us get there. thats why these mocks do that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bungleodeon


Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 9078
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WTF is this. Crying or Very sad
_________________
Adopt-a-Brown: Jabaal Sheard - Stats:
First 3 seasons: 135 Tackles - 21 Sacks - 7 FF - 2 FR - 9 PD - 11 STF
2014: 9 Tackles - 1 Sack - 1 PD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bulldog


Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Posts: 5833
Location: Salem
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mistakebytehlak wrote:
bulldog wrote:
Dropkick_pride wrote:
Estonianzulu wrote:
Well, its safe to say you nailed it with the thread title.


Ditto.


Its ok. Most people don't like different. And I can't stand seeing the same mock drafts over and over again. Which is why I hardly ever comment on them. B/c they are usually the same as the other guy who just made one yesterday except for a player or two.


just because its different, doesn't mean its good. sometimes consensus is the way to go. pretty sure we all know we need to get a qb. we all know that our O is lagging behind our D and we need another weapon or two. Those have to be done, and there will likely be high draft picks that will help us get there. thats why these mocks do that.


I just hate seeing the same thing over and over again. The draft never turns out like we think it will so I try to think outside the box.

This team is only as good as the weakest links. So I took the approach to fix those issues while keeping in mind that the FO loves Hoyer (This is an assumption, but its definitely a real possibility)
_________________
2013 First Ballot Recipient of the Joe Blackburn Award
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mistakebytehlak


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 44841
Location: Brooklyn, NY
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bulldog wrote:
mistakebytehlak wrote:
bulldog wrote:
Dropkick_pride wrote:
Estonianzulu wrote:
Well, its safe to say you nailed it with the thread title.


Ditto.


Its ok. Most people don't like different. And I can't stand seeing the same mock drafts over and over again. Which is why I hardly ever comment on them. B/c they are usually the same as the other guy who just made one yesterday except for a player or two.


just because its different, doesn't mean its good. sometimes consensus is the way to go. pretty sure we all know we need to get a qb. we all know that our O is lagging behind our D and we need another weapon or two. Those have to be done, and there will likely be high draft picks that will help us get there. thats why these mocks do that.


I just hate seeing the same thing over and over again. The draft never turns out like we think it will so I try to think outside the box.

This team is only as good as the weakest links. So I took the approach to fix those issues while keeping in mind that the FO loves Hoyer (This is an assumption, but its definitely a real possibility)


we need impact players. that is our weakest link. we need more turnovers on D, but more importatnly we need touchdowns. a RT in the first?

blech
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bulldog


Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Posts: 5833
Location: Salem
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mistakebytehlak wrote:
bulldog wrote:
mistakebytehlak wrote:
bulldog wrote:
Dropkick_pride wrote:
Estonianzulu wrote:
Well, its safe to say you nailed it with the thread title.


Ditto.


Its ok. Most people don't like different. And I can't stand seeing the same mock drafts over and over again. Which is why I hardly ever comment on them. B/c they are usually the same as the other guy who just made one yesterday except for a player or two.


just because its different, doesn't mean its good. sometimes consensus is the way to go. pretty sure we all know we need to get a qb. we all know that our O is lagging behind our D and we need another weapon or two. Those have to be done, and there will likely be high draft picks that will help us get there. thats why these mocks do that.


I just hate seeing the same thing over and over again. The draft never turns out like we think it will so I try to think outside the box.

This team is only as good as the weakest links. So I took the approach to fix those issues while keeping in mind that the FO loves Hoyer (This is an assumption, but its definitely a real possibility)


we need impact players. that is our weakest link. we need more turnovers on D, but more importatnly we need touchdowns. a RT in the first?

blech


But everyone else drafting a G is better? I know your not OK with that...

RB was had in FA. I think Landry can be elite. TO's on defense, so I took a coverage LB,

I guess it should have been noted that I assumed the top QB's are gone, Hundley unlikely declares and I hate the rest of the QB class. So, build the rest of the team through BPA.

I don't do mocks very often, and I surely don't do them to impress people, but rather make other options known to those who do the same thing over and over.
_________________
2013 First Ballot Recipient of the Joe Blackburn Award
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mistakebytehlak


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 44841
Location: Brooklyn, NY
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

im all for outside the box thinking, but in this case i agree with whats inside the box. sometimes you just gotta keep it simple, thats all im sayin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hornbybrown


Joined: 25 Jan 2008
Posts: 15566
Location: 1600 Pennyslvania Ave
PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't like it.

We are going Offense early and often in this draft.

Weapons for whoever the QB is and maybe a QB.

I think this QB class is not as good as we first thought and I also feel like there is more QB needy teams than normal.

So for those that say we have to trade up for a QB if there is one we like it might not work out. A team that needs a franchise QB is not going to trade it to us.
_________________


Adopt a Brown 2014
Miles Austin
Pierre Desir
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KamTrus20


Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Posts: 5360
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mistakebytehlak wrote:
bulldog wrote:
Dropkick_pride wrote:
Estonianzulu wrote:
Well, its safe to say you nailed it with the thread title.


Ditto.


Its ok. Most people don't like different. And I can't stand seeing the same mock drafts over and over again. Which is why I hardly ever comment on them. B/c they are usually the same as the other guy who just made one yesterday except for a player or two.


just because its different, doesn't mean its good. sometimes consensus is the way to go. pretty sure we all know we need to get a qb. we all know that our O is lagging behind our D and we need another weapon or two. Those have to be done, and there will likely be high draft picks that will help us get there. thats why these mocks do that.


Some times consensus is the way to go and sometimes consensus gets you Trent Richardson.


The RT position is so much more valuable than fans make it out to be, and so much more valuable than it was even just 10 years ago.
_________________


Jamison on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mistakebytehlak


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 44841
Location: Brooklyn, NY
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KamTrus20 wrote:
mistakebytehlak wrote:
bulldog wrote:
Dropkick_pride wrote:
Estonianzulu wrote:
Well, its safe to say you nailed it with the thread title.


Ditto.


Its ok. Most people don't like different. And I can't stand seeing the same mock drafts over and over again. Which is why I hardly ever comment on them. B/c they are usually the same as the other guy who just made one yesterday except for a player or two.


just because its different, doesn't mean its good. sometimes consensus is the way to go. pretty sure we all know we need to get a qb. we all know that our O is lagging behind our D and we need another weapon or two. Those have to be done, and there will likely be high draft picks that will help us get there. thats why these mocks do that.


Some times consensus is the way to go and sometimes consensus gets you Trent Richardson.


The RT position is so much more valuable than fans make it out to be, and so much more valuable than it was even just 10 years ago.


na, the consensus in that draft was do whatever you can to get a QB, which we tried, and failed. c'est la vie
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TypicalBrowns10


Joined: 03 Jan 2012
Posts: 1098
Location: Ohio
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You guys are forgetting who the GM is. This is realistic.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
freakygeniuskid


Moderator
Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 5361
Location: Charlotte, NC
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KamTrus20 wrote:
http://www.al.com/alabamafootball/index.ssf/2013/10/the_slap_becomes_alabama_left.html

Here is the article.

If you have some Bama games recorded I have seen it from him half dozen or so other times.


That is the funniest thing ever.

The B*&^% slap used as a blocking tool.

I am amazed.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dropkick_pride


Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 10805
Location: C-bus
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mistakebytehlak wrote:
im all for outside the box thinking, but in this case i agree with whats inside the box. sometimes you just gotta keep it simple, thats all im sayin

.
Second time in one thread I agree with mistake.

Wow, this mock MUST be bad. Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cleveland Browns All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group