| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
AP_allday2869
Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Posts: 8215
Location: Sioux City/ University of Iowa
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:29 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
perfect pick.
_________________
| Quote: | | #Vikings H.C. Mike Zimmer: "I agree that it was a cheap shot. [Gregg Williams'] defenses are all like that." |
FFMD '15 Vikings VP of Public Relations |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
7DnBrnc53
Joined: 09 Mar 2010
Posts: 3253
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Chiefs and Saints in the Super Bowl? I don't think so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sayheykid
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 5442
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Zero interest in Mariota.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Danish49ers
Joined: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 1313
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I am a bit torn; Purifoy or Roby... either makes sense, and both has the potential to be a new nr. 1 CB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anonymous3
Joined: 09 Oct 2011
Posts: 3649
Location: 12,998 ft above sea level
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jason_Bengal_Fl wrote: | | ochocinco4pres wrote: | | I dont dislike Shazier, but I think I would prefer a corner at this point |
We don't need a WLB anyway. Burfict is playing at an All Pro level.
I agree, CB in 1. DE and SLB in order of value in 2 and 3. |
This - I wouldn't touch either Roby or Shazier at this point.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KJtheWicked
Joined: 30 Dec 2007
Posts: 1909
Location: Norrisville, Pa
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Love the Steeler pick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gameface
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 414
Location: Maple Ridge, BC
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quite like Seattle's pick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BEASToftheEAST4
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 2838
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Can't get much better for the Rams two first Rounders than Matthews and Clinton-Dix, though I do think they could trade back a bit and still get him but if not, still no complaints from my end |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The OUTLAW
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 8639
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | The OUTLAW wrote: | | I don't really like this for the Browns. I don't trust Hundley and no way is Sankey worth a first rounder. |
Why? Because you don't think of highly or the RB position as a whole?
Sankey is a top 2-3 RB in this class imo. |
Pretty much, and if you say he is top 2 or 3 why do you have him going first?
_________________
You show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser
Vince Lombardi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
