| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
patsfan25
Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 6115
Location: CenCal
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:37 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
This freakin sucks. It totally doesn't help his surge and hot start to the season. I was hoping he would have all the opportunity to build upon Buffalo.
_________________
Logan Ryan
Tackles:13 Forced Fumbles:1
PDs:3 INTs:1 Pick 6s:
Deadpulse Ink. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brocktonbob
Joined: 11 Aug 2013
Posts: 319
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Winning tuff close games while handling adversity will help this team a lot more than hammering them much like the last few years in the long run. Geno Smith is not coming into Foxboro on a short week and beating us unless we beat ourselves and after last week, I don't see that happening. Tuff physical game but a win 28-14 category. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dalton
Joined: 16 Mar 2010
Posts: 3311
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Pats#1 wrote: | | Dalton wrote: | So, there goes 1/3 of the viable receiving options with one player.
What's left?
Amendola - Looked fantastic. Maybe even better than Welker. Let's hope his "groin" is ok.
Edelman - Played well for the most part... He knows the system and is the only veteran receiver out there.
Thompkins - Looked more raw than a living cow. Not on the same page as Brady. Brady no like!
Boyce, Dobson, and Slater - All of these guys are apparently worse options right now than Thompkins, which is very scary...
So next week versus the Jets, they're going to wheel out Amendola, Edelman, Thompkins, Slater, and [Boyce/Dobson].
Is this supposed to strike fear?
Imagine facing the Ravens last year with this receiving corp. Imagine facing any half-way decent secondary that's not missing its best two players. Just play tight coverage on Amendola and Edelman and eliminate the short routes. BAM! You've shut down the passing game. Brady will throw to a clueless Thompkins for an incompletion/INT.
Couple these facts with Ridley turning the ball over a few times a game because there's no one else, and you got one of the worst offenses in Patriot history.
 |
You're right, we should just forfeit to the Jets because we're gonna lose anyways and might as well not risk injuring anyone else. |
Implying that you were being sarcastic, no where did I imply that the Pats can't beat the Jets...
However bad the offense is, I expect the Jets' to be worse fortunately. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
terbo559
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 3264
Location: California
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I hope we get Gronk back by the Falcons game in week 4. I hope Ridley mans up while Vereen is out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pats#1
Joined: 19 Aug 2011
Posts: 6727
Location: Plymouth, MA
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Out at least 8 weeks now....ugh.
I really hope this doesn't turn into another Gronk type thing where he never fully recovers. I'm guessing thats why they put him on IR and not going to take any chances rushing him back.
_________________
Sig credit: Deadpulse |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PoWww
Joined: 28 Feb 2013
Posts: 1922
Location: SB XLIX CHAMPIONS
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Won't see him back until Week 11. Pretty big blow to the offense. Hopefully we get Gronk back for that tough stretch of games coming up after TB.
_________________
^Deadpulse |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
2Bigby0
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 647
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Any chance Brandon Bolden fills the Vereen role? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nihc
Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 3501
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 2Bigby0 wrote: | | Any chance Brandon Bolden fills the Vereen role? |
not a chance
_________________
2014 Adopt-a-Patriot - Dominique Easley
Tackles: 0 | Sacks: 0 | QB Hits: 0 | TFL: 0 | Fumble Recoveries: 0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 26715
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nihc wrote: | | 2Bigby0 wrote: | | Any chance Brandon Bolden fills the Vereen role? |
not a chance |
He might get some reps in passing downs if his ankle is healthy. I'd much prefer him to Leon Washington or Legarrette Blount.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Deadpulse
Joined: 16 Oct 2008
Posts: 10222
Location: Boston MA
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mcmurtry86 wrote: | | Nihc wrote: | | 2Bigby0 wrote: | | Any chance Brandon Bolden fills the Vereen role? |
not a chance |
He might get some reps in passing downs if his ankle is healthy. I'd much prefer him to Leon Washington or Legarrette Blount. |
Can I pick none of the three?
_________________
Sigs-Taking Requests |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 26715
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Deadpulse wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | Nihc wrote: | | 2Bigby0 wrote: | | Any chance Brandon Bolden fills the Vereen role? |
not a chance |
He might get some reps in passing downs if his ankle is healthy. I'd much prefer him to Leon Washington or Legarrette Blount. |
Can I pick none of the three? |
Sure, but that leaves Ridley in that role and he isn't very useful in the pass game.
Maybe Develin 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
