| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RG25
Joined: 10 Dec 2012
Posts: 242
Location: Italy
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:01 am Post subject: Which ex-packer will have a better year for the vikings? |
 |
|
|
Bishop or Jennings? (barring to injuries to either)
Personally I think Bishop is going to have the better year IMO. My biggest question for GJ is can he produce when he doesn't have a great QB to throw him the ball and other great WRs to take the pressure off of him. I don't think he will. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DavidatMIZZOU
Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 8020
Location: The ZOU
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Benedict Jennings. I don't think Bishop will play very much.
_________________
GO PACK GO!
| mistakebytehlak wrote: |
My god it must be so terrible to have three teams that consistently make the playoffs |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
squire12
Joined: 15 Mar 2013
Posts: 1363
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DavidatMIZZOU wrote: | | Benedict Jennings. I don't think Bishop will play very much. |
Jennings. I know Jennings will make the 53, I am not giving Bishop much of a chance to make the 53. If Bishop does, I feel that will be telling of the state of their LB's adn a good thing for the Pack. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
byzr
Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 2891
Location: Kentucky
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
i don't think we would have cut Bishop if there weren't some pretty big red flags about his injury and he would have gotten a better FA contract if other teams didn't feel the same way.
Jennings could put up really good numbers if Ponder can get him the ball. he has a good TE and probably the best RB in the league so unless its a 3rd and long teams won't be double teaming him to much to account for Peterson.i wouldn't be surprised to see him put up 1k yards and 10-15 TDs.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CentralFC
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 3069
Location: Evanston, IL
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Jennings. Quite an easy question.
He was injured throughout 2012, but we saw flashes in week 17 when Jennings was absolutely dominant. I see more of this in 2013 now that he has recovered from his hip injury. A young QB searching for a true #1 will also play to his favor. I think it's realistic to predict 70 receptions and 1,000 yards with 8 scores. Jennings still has it.
_________________
BeeperKing: | Quote: | | Are you missing your two best receiving options? Starting running back? Best defensive player? Starting left and right tackles? Green Bay's injury situation is nowhere near as bad as ours. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 10449
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Some of you guys are so salty 
_________________
| DavidatMIZZOU wrote: | | GBPACKMAN4LIFE wrote: | | At least they're not a cheating disgrace to their respective sports. |
We don't talk about Wilson here. There's a Seahawks board for that. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 6782
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bregory Farvings |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PackFan4Life
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 3710
Location: De Pere, WI
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | Some of you guys are so salty |
Not really. Some of us just recognize that the person is wearing purple now and could careless how that person performs as long as they lose to the Packers at least twice a year as they always should.  The worse they perform the better in all cases when it comes to wearing that hideous jersey. :-& |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Polaris
Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 3127
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| They're all going to suck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Uprising
Joined: 18 Jul 2013
Posts: 28
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jennings will, as long as Ponder doesn't give Peterson the ball every chance he can. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vikefan79
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 28310
Location: Atlanta
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PackFan4Life wrote: | | justo wrote: | | Some of you guys are so salty |
Not really. Some of us just recognize that the person is wearing purple now and could careless how that person performs as long as they lose to the Packers at least twice a year as they always should. The worse they perform the better in all cases when it comes to wearing that hideous jersey. :-& |
My favorite packer poster!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CWood21
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 32335
Location: 'Merica
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PackFan4Life wrote: | | justo wrote: | | Some of you guys are so salty |
Not really. Some of us just recognize that the person is wearing purple now and could careless how that person performs as long as they lose to the Packers at least twice a year as they always should. The worse they perform the better in all cases when it comes to wearing that hideous jersey. :-& |
It's not even that. It's comments like Mizzou's. Would anyone else really turn down significantly more money and more years? The answer is most people wouldn't. I don't see how he's "Benedict Jennings". He's still a great guy, although I'll root for him so long as it doesn't affect the Packers' ability to compete for a championship.
_________________
| Gmen4ev wrote: | | Couldn't? With a little hard work and determination I could have fit that cow in a locker. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ketchup
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 12718
Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CWood21 wrote: | | PackFan4Life wrote: | | justo wrote: | | Some of you guys are so salty |
Not really. Some of us just recognize that the person is wearing purple now and could careless how that person performs as long as they lose to the Packers at least twice a year as they always should. The worse they perform the better in all cases when it comes to wearing that hideous jersey. :-& |
It's not even that. It's comments like Mizzou's. Would anyone else really turn down significantly more money and more years? The answer is most people wouldn't. I don't see how he's "Benedict Jennings". He's still a great guy, although I'll root for him so long as it doesn't affect the Packers' ability to compete for a championship. |
I'm starting to wonder about that. He seems to have a hard time keeping his mouth shut about the Packers now. I was with you CWood in that my opinion was much like this but the more Jennings talks, the less I'm going to continue to like him it appears because he's been taking a lot of pot shots at us.
_________________
Kempes on the custom sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ECPackers
Joined: 24 Oct 2010
Posts: 954
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
wonder how many times jennings will be underthrown before he quits on his 'team' bwahhaha
jennings -38 catches 785 yards, 4 td
_________________
GREEN BAY PACKERS
JARRET BUSH IS MY BOY!
Brewers
Bucks
Badgers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vikingsrule
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 43066
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I wouldn't expect any wr for the Vikings to have a big statistical year. The reality is, mn has four Wrs that will all figure to be involved. In addition to having a good te in Rudolph and making sure Peterson I'd getting his careers. I think if Jennings can make an impact as a plus 15 yards downfield receiver in addition to 7 to 8 Tds, most Vikings fans will be pleased. I just don't see 80 to 90 catches as likely with how I expect mn to spread the ball around.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
