View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
WizardHawk 
Joined: 31 Jan 2009 Posts: 15678 Location: Hawkeye State
|
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 2:59 pm Post subject: NFL's Top 100 |
|
|
|
LINKY
Ware listed at #10. Romo, Dez, and Witten also listed.
JJ Watt #2. Man, Watt and Ware would have been a hellva tandem.
[not complaining about getting Tyron!!] _________________
Kiltman on the sig & avy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Texas_OutLaw7 


Joined: 27 Mar 2005 Posts: 28320 Location: Cowboys Forum ROH Class of '12
|
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Romo is much higher than I thought he would be. But I agree with the 4 listed. Hopefully we can add Lee's name soon. _________________
In Redball I Trust!
The price of progress is trusting the process.
Heart. Leadership. Passion. Will. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
htfryar 
Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 12949 Location: Arkansas
|
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Texas_OutLaw7 wrote: | :shock:
Romo is much higher than I thought he would be. But I agree with the 4 listed. Hopefully we can add Lee's name soon. |
He'd probably be on there if he didn't keep getting hurt. _________________
My how the years have flown by. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaddHatter 
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 46945 Location: ROH Class of 14
|
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hard to buy that Eli at 28 is vastly better than Romo at 62 when Romo outperformed Eli in nearly every way last yeat _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
buckwild
Joined: 25 Jan 2011 Posts: 2065 Location: Ft Worth, Tx
|
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's because of the hardware, and until Romo has success in the post season then he will continue to get disrespected by the media. _________________
Thanks Mike23md for the Sig |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
htfryar 
Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 12949 Location: Arkansas
|
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Witten shoul be higher. He just had the statistically best season of any TE in league history. I can see Gronkowski being ahead of him, but Graham? _________________
My how the years have flown by.
Last edited by htfryar on Tue May 14, 2013 4:48 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaddHatter 
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 46945 Location: ROH Class of 14
|
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I thought this was based solely on 2012 _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GeneralDissaray 
Joined: 07 Apr 2006 Posts: 6488
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
MaddHatter wrote: | I thought this was based solely on 2012 |
This is why it's absolutely stupid. You can have guys on the list that didn't play most of the season. Didn't Peyton make the list in 2011, when he didn't play at all? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dboys88-82 
Joined: 12 Jan 2011 Posts: 1758
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
GeneralDissaray wrote: | MaddHatter wrote: | I thought this was based solely on 2012 |
This is why it's absolutely stupid. You can have guys on the list that didn't play most of the season. Didn't Peyton make the list in 2011, when he didn't play at all? |
This is from the webpage:
Quote: | But this list isn't one that grades the players just on how they played last year, or their popularity, but on where they rank heading into 2013. |
_________________
^^Thanks to Kempes for the sig.^^ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaddHatter 
Joined: 29 Nov 2006 Posts: 46945 Location: ROH Class of 14
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Dboys88-82 wrote: | GeneralDissaray wrote: | MaddHatter wrote: | I thought this was based solely on 2012 |
This is why it's absolutely stupid. You can have guys on the list that didn't play most of the season. Didn't Peyton make the list in 2011, when he didn't play at all? |
This is from the webpage:
Quote: | But this list isn't one that grades the players just on how they played last year, or their popularity, but on where they rank heading into 2013. |
|
Makes no sense as the hardware is then eliminated as it has no bearong going forward and Romo has sognificantly outprodcuced Eli in nearly every category every year hes been healthy
Itd be one thing if Eli was 5 or so spots ahead and got the nod for the hardware bit 40+ spots is asinine _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Hoover82 
Joined: 19 Jan 2013 Posts: 2530 Location: Ft.Worth Texas
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Next yr I think these will be the Cowboys on the top 100. Romo, Dez, Witten, T.Smith, D.Ware, S.Lee, B.Carr. Hopefully M.Claiborne can breakout this yr as well but we shall see. _________________ AMERICA'S TEAM and 5x SB CHAMPIONS = DALLAS COWBOYS!!!!!
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
retrolock 
Joined: 07 Feb 2013 Posts: 1025
|
Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's sad that Tony Romo isn't even in the NFL players' top 100
Stats should not always be relied upon, but he has been better than that Manning guy in NY. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WizardHawk 
Joined: 31 Jan 2009 Posts: 15678 Location: Hawkeye State
|
Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
retrolock wrote: | It's sad that Tony Romo isn't even in the NFL players' top 100. |
Romo is #62 on the list. _________________
Kiltman on the sig & avy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
plan9misfit 

 Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 23296 Location: RIP: B2TB, T14, & S.A. We miss you.
|
Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
retrolock wrote: | It's sad that Tony Romo isn't even in the NFL players' top 100
Stats should not always be relied upon, but he has been better than that Manning guy in NY. |
That Manning guy has 2 Super Bowl championships to his name and his play was superb not only getting there, but in the games themselves. Romo is low on that list because of his epic choke jobs. If he had the same success as Eli, he'd likely be in the top 5. _________________
Co-Founder: DCRA - No McQuistan, No Super Bowl
Northland wrote: | If mediocrity is your SuperBowl then Garrett is your Lombardi. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cowboyfanin2890
Joined: 12 Feb 2012 Posts: 1872 Location: Hayesville NC
|
Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
plan9misfit wrote: | retrolock wrote: | It's sad that Tony Romo isn't even in the NFL players' top 100
Stats should not always be relied upon, but he has been better than that Manning guy in NY. |
That Manning guy has 2 Super Bowl championships to his name and his play was superb not only getting there, but in the games themselves. Romo is low on that list because of his epic choke jobs. If he had the same success as Eli, he'd likely be in the top 5. |
Looks that Manning and Brady have more turnovers in the 4th quarter than Romo. Going by this assinine way of thinking Trent Dilfer is a much better QB than Fouts and Marino, and just as good as Peyton.
Without the D, Manning does not even sniff the playoffs much less the Super Bowl. 2starting caliber running backs and a real play caller. I understand the PERCEPTION of Romo, but the realism is that he is a helluva a QB that makes the same amount to less mistakes as other great QB's. If you throw an INT at the start of the 4th quarter and it cost your team the game, it was just as important as the 1 thrown at the very end of the 4th by the guy that had to bring his team back from 14 down to get that close. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|