Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Garcon #8,Hank & Moss top 50 in TDs & FDs per route

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Washington Redskins
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
turtle28


Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 63044
Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:45 am    Post subject: Garcon #8,Hank & Moss top 50 in TDs & FDs per route Reply with quote

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/03/18/sig-stats-first-downs-touchdowns-per-route-run-wrs/

Pretty cool stat here by pro football focus. Hankerson and Moss were top 50 in first downs and touch downs per route run last year. Morgan is top 75.

If Hank can just concentrate more and not have around 10 drops a year he could be developing into something special.

Embarassed I missed Pierre Garcon meaning 8 thnon the list and that was with a hurt foot all year! Shocked Cool
_________________
RIP SSFmike23md
Quote:
Adopt-a-Redskin: Brian Orakpo:4 tackles,


Last edited by turtle28 on Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:26 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
tyler735


Joined: 12 Aug 2007
Posts: 1579
Location: Minnesota
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While the stat sounds nice in theory...I think it has more to do with RG3/the system we run. It really shows how efficient RG3 was this year throwing the ball. For example, guys like Julio Jones/AJ Green arent even in the top 10 so it really doesn't show how good a WR is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
turtle28


Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 63044
Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tyler735 wrote:
While the stat sounds nice in theory...I think it has more to do with RG3/the system we run. It really shows how efficient RG3 was this year throwing the ball. For example, guys like Julio Jones/AJ Green arent even in the top 10 so it really doesn't show how good a WR is.
dissing the best WR wr core weve had in 20 years again.... Confused smh .

It also shows that our top 4 wrs are efficient. Meaning because of our running game they get open and get first downs or touchdowns at high percentage when given the ball. If we didnt have 4 wrs with ovee 500 yards and Garcon was healthy, he might have a chane to have 1500 yds and 12 tds, but he wasnt healthy and we have balance like the packers do. Some have been screaming at me all offseason they good enough because they have a "man crush" on one of two wrs, but we won the division with our best wr being hurt all year and he young guys will only improve.

Now that moss is back i think we can finally put the wr in the 2nd or 3rd and probably 4th round option to rest.

We have our vets who and Hank who are efficient, even if it is because of the running game, that's what a running game is supposed to do for a passing offense, open up more holes to throw in and get wrs open because DBs and lbs bite on play action. Then other than the vets we have two guys who barely got to play last year in Robinson and Briscoe but have flashed talent that they can develop into something good or even if we're lucky great.
_________________
RIP SSFmike23md
Quote:
Adopt-a-Redskin: Brian Orakpo:4 tackles,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Washington Redskins All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group