| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JTagg7754 
Joined: 09 Nov 2010 Posts: 7400 Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| HvacRaider wrote: | I want Pryor to start we need to know if he is a starter
Or even a backup. I think he will be a above average
QB. With the rumor of VY floating around
If shows that most people in the media see Pryor
As a legitimate option for us, I'm just wondering why
It wasn't far tarvaris Jackson joe Webb or any other
Semi mobile QB being talked about |
I would think the opposite. W/ all the rumors w/ VY floating around, I would say it's b/c people don't think Pryor is capable.... why else look for the QB who is essentially exactly the same?? _________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HvacRaider
Joined: 12 Mar 2013 Posts: 71 Location: Elsinore
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | HvacRaider wrote: | I want Pryor to start we need to know if he is a starter
Or even a backup. I think he will be a above average
QB. With the rumor of VY floating around
If shows that most people in the media see Pryor
As a legitimate option for us, I'm just wondering why
It wasn't far tarvaris Jackson joe Webb or any other
Semi mobile QB being talked about |
I would think the opposite. W/ all the rumors w/ VY floating around, I would say it's b/c people don't think Pryor is capable.... why else look for the QB who is essentially exactly the same?? |
If the QB is the same type player then the offense
Doesn't need to change all that much if the starter goes down
So that's why you might look to bring in the same type player
Look at Philly they have Vick and brought in Dixon
It just makes sense to not have a traditional/running starter and a
Backup completely opposite _________________ Raiders/Angels/Lakers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
holyghost 
Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Posts: 5328
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Seems like you guys are overlooking what seems to be interest in Vince Young on Vince Young's end. Did Oakland ask about him? I didn't read that part.. So how can anything about this indicate anything about Pryor or Palmer? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JTagg7754 
Joined: 09 Nov 2010 Posts: 7400 Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| HvacRaider wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | HvacRaider wrote: | I want Pryor to start we need to know if he is a starter
Or even a backup. I think he will be a above average
QB. With the rumor of VY floating around
If shows that most people in the media see Pryor
As a legitimate option for us, I'm just wondering why
It wasn't far tarvaris Jackson joe Webb or any other
Semi mobile QB being talked about |
I would think the opposite. W/ all the rumors w/ VY floating around, I would say it's b/c people don't think Pryor is capable.... why else look for the QB who is essentially exactly the same?? |
If the QB is the same type player then the offense
Doesn't need to change all that much if the starter goes down
So that's why you might look to bring in the same type player
Look at Philly they have Vick and brought in Dixon
It just makes sense to not have a traditional/running starter and a
Backup completely opposite |
So Joe Flacco and Tyrod Taylor are the same? Vick and Foles? While I agree your logic makes sense, I just don't agree that's the case. _________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RaisinBran
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 8888 Location: 925 Bay Area
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nbaker1933 wrote: | | RaisinBran wrote: | | nbaker1933 wrote: | Not a big fan of TP or VY. but VY has better arm strength than TP.
|
No he doesn't. |
Im going purely off his one SD game. Im not talking how far he can throw, but the velocity on a pass to pass basis.
But i am in the Cut Palmer see what TP cando camp. (even though i think Palmer is lightyears better) I just dont see us as more than a 6 win team with Palmer next year anyway. |
Hmm ok. And I agree on the 2nd half of your post. _________________ (MLB)=A's, (NFL)=Raiders, (NBA)= Warriors
360 GT: KDubballin24 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Baggabonez 
Joined: 29 Apr 2010 Posts: 3861 Location: RaiderNation
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | HvacRaider wrote: | I want Pryor to start we need to know if he is a starter
Or even a backup. I think he will be a above average
QB. With the rumor of VY floating around
If shows that most people in the media see Pryor
As a legitimate option for us, I'm just wondering why
It wasn't far tarvaris Jackson joe Webb or any other
Semi mobile QB being talked about |
I would think the opposite. W/ all the rumors w/ VY floating around, I would say it's b/c people don't think Pryor is capable.... why else look for the QB who is essentially exactly the same?? |
Because ultimately neither is capable of of high caliber QB play. #JointheClownParade #SuckitDocLew #Backinguptogetarunningstart  _________________ 2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dreadymatt
Joined: 05 Feb 2010 Posts: 763 Location: Saturn
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JTagg7754 
Joined: 09 Nov 2010 Posts: 7400 Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Baggabonez wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | HvacRaider wrote: | I want Pryor to start we need to know if he is a starter
Or even a backup. I think he will be a above average
QB. With the rumor of VY floating around
If shows that most people in the media see Pryor
As a legitimate option for us, I'm just wondering why
It wasn't far tarvaris Jackson joe Webb or any other
Semi mobile QB being talked about |
I would think the opposite. W/ all the rumors w/ VY floating around, I would say it's b/c people don't think Pryor is capable.... why else look for the QB who is essentially exactly the same?? |
Because ultimately neither is capable of of high caliber QB play. #JointheClownParade #SuckitDocLew #Backinguptogetarunningstart  |
I'm still convinced that if we get the first overall pick, Clowney is staying in school. _________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Baggabonez 
Joined: 29 Apr 2010 Posts: 3861 Location: RaiderNation
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | Baggabonez wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | HvacRaider wrote: | I want Pryor to start we need to know if he is a starter
Or even a backup. I think he will be a above average
QB. With the rumor of VY floating around
If shows that most people in the media see Pryor
As a legitimate option for us, I'm just wondering why
It wasn't far tarvaris Jackson joe Webb or any other
Semi mobile QB being talked about |
I would think the opposite. W/ all the rumors w/ VY floating around, I would say it's b/c people don't think Pryor is capable.... why else look for the QB who is essentially exactly the same?? |
Because ultimately neither is capable of of high caliber QB play. #JointheClownParade #SuckitDocLew #Backinguptogetarunningstart  |
I'm still convinced that if we get the first overall pick, Clowney is staying in school. |
I don't think Clowney really likes school. He has been NFL ready since his freshman year. I think it is more likely that Clowney threatens to hold out. However, I am confident that eventually McKenzie will sell Clowney on the new Raiders. In addition, the stadium issue (ie- potential move) will be much less convoluted. Lastly, the QB class will be far superior.
No one can be disappointed with a Clowney/Aaron Murry combo. _________________ 2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raiiiiidersssss 
Joined: 23 Jan 2007 Posts: 4134 Location: The Black Hole
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | Baggabonez wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | HvacRaider wrote: | I want Pryor to start we need to know if he is a starter
Or even a backup. I think he will be a above average
QB. With the rumor of VY floating around
If shows that most people in the media see Pryor
As a legitimate option for us, I'm just wondering why
It wasn't far tarvaris Jackson joe Webb or any other
Semi mobile QB being talked about |
I would think the opposite. W/ all the rumors w/ VY floating around, I would say it's b/c people don't think Pryor is capable.... why else look for the QB who is essentially exactly the same?? |
Because ultimately neither is capable of of high caliber QB play. #JointheClownParade #SuckitDocLew #Backinguptogetarunningstart  |
I'm still convinced that if we get the first overall pick, Clowney is staying in school. |
Why?
And I wouldn't mind Teddy anyway _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oakdb36 
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 Posts: 12824
|
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Raiiiiidersssss wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | Baggabonez wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | HvacRaider wrote: | I want Pryor to start we need to know if he is a starter
Or even a backup. I think he will be a above average
QB. With the rumor of VY floating around
If shows that most people in the media see Pryor
As a legitimate option for us, I'm just wondering why
It wasn't far tarvaris Jackson joe Webb or any other
Semi mobile QB being talked about |
I would think the opposite. W/ all the rumors w/ VY floating around, I would say it's b/c people don't think Pryor is capable.... why else look for the QB who is essentially exactly the same?? |
Because ultimately neither is capable of of high caliber QB play. #JointheClownParade #SuckitDocLew #Backinguptogetarunningstart  |
I'm still convinced that if we get the first overall pick, Clowney is staying in school. |
Why?
And I wouldn't mind Teddy anyway |
No good reason. Everyone drafting #1 overall is in a bad situation. College players go pro early to make money. _________________
| Plush wrote: | | Papa was a trolling stone |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dreadymatt
Joined: 05 Feb 2010 Posts: 763 Location: Saturn
|
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Its sad, but if we signed VY he'd probably give us the biggest chance of winning in 2013 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RaiderX 
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 17256 Location: Crown Town, CA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| holyghost wrote: | | Seems like you guys are overlooking what seems to be interest in Vince Young on Vince Young's end. Did Oakland ask about him? I didn't read that part.. So how can anything about this indicate anything about Pryor or Palmer? |
[/thread] _________________
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|