| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dsorc 
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Posts: 1848 Location: St. Louis
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| LORK 88 wrote: | | Pastor Dillon wrote: | ive been looking at projections for Comp picks and most have us getting an extra 3rd and 6th
those would be huge for us. we would have the picks needed to trade up into the 2nd round or 1st round if we chose to. we could package our 2nd and 3rd and move into the top of the 2nd round and still have a 3rd
lots of options. either way, we need as many 3-5 rounders as possible simply to improve our special teams and our depth |
Can't trade comp picks. |
I think he's thinking of trading the normal picks and still having a third round pick because of the comp. If we get multiple comp picks, trading of our original picks I think becomes more likely if only to consolidate their value. This is predicated on getting good comp picks though. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pastor Dillon
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 4481 Location: Mountain Home, Arkansas
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lumberjackchris wrote: | | LORK 88 wrote: | | Pastor Dillon wrote: | ive been looking at projections for Comp picks and most have us getting an extra 3rd and 6th
those would be huge for us. we would have the picks needed to trade up into the 2nd round or 1st round if we chose to. we could package our 2nd and 3rd and move into the top of the 2nd round and still have a 3rd
lots of options. either way, we need as many 3-5 rounders as possible simply to improve our special teams and our depth |
Can't trade comp picks. |
What he's suggesting is trade our original 2nd and 3rd for an early 2nd or maybe llate 1st. Which would still leave us with our 1st, a new acquired 1st/2nd and our comp 3rd |
thats what i was referring to _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pastor Dillon
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 4481 Location: Mountain Home, Arkansas
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If we want a first round WR, why not sign victor Cruz? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marco79 
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Posts: 11450 Location: Bloomington, IN
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Pastor Dillon wrote: | | If we want a first round WR, why not sign victor Cruz? |
Agreed.
But money is probably a problem if they don't restructure some contracts. _________________
adopt-a-texan
kareem jackson: 52 tackles, 16 pdef, 4 int, 1 td |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
amazingandre 
Joined: 16 Dec 2007 Posts: 13376 Location: Elkhorn, WI
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Pastor Dillon wrote: | | If we want a first round WR, why not sign victor Cruz? |
with what, monopoly money? _________________
]
Adopt a Texan :Trindon Holliday
15.7 per attempt KR / 14 per attempt PR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kenney 
Joined: 24 Dec 2006 Posts: 11369
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| amazingandre wrote: | | Pastor Dillon wrote: | | If we want a first round WR, why not sign victor Cruz? |
with what, monopoly money? |
Wait, can we do that? _________________ Welcome to Houston, DeAndre Hopkins! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
amazingandre 
Joined: 16 Dec 2007 Posts: 13376 Location: Elkhorn, WI
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kenney wrote: | | amazingandre wrote: | | Pastor Dillon wrote: | | If we want a first round WR, why not sign victor Cruz? |
with what, monopoly money? |
Wait, can we do that? |
if so, I have credit card monopoly, lets max that out!!! _________________
]
Adopt a Texan :Trindon Holliday
15.7 per attempt KR / 14 per attempt PR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
texans_uk 
Joined: 26 Feb 2009 Posts: 25079 Location: Kempes on the sig
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Pastor Dillon wrote: | | If we want a first round WR, why not sign victor Cruz? |
RT is an issue too, let's sign Jake Long. _________________
| DallasInHeart wrote: | | Buddy if you lived in Europe or ever gone to visit Europe you would know that over there Football is totally on a different level |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Texansfan713 
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Posts: 23402 Location: Houston
|
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| texans_uk wrote: | | Pastor Dillon wrote: | | If we want a first round WR, why not sign victor Cruz? |
RT is an issue too, let's sign Jake Long. |
I died.
Yeah, we can forget about Cruz and Long. Getting Cruz on FFMD was good though.  _________________
2011 and 2012 AFC South Champs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wolf6151
Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 2560 Location: Pearland, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| LORK 88 wrote: | | Wolf6151 wrote: | | lumberjackchris wrote: | http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/07/draft-buzz-builds-around-e-j-manuel/
Noooooooooo |
I'm guessing you really wanted him for the Texans in the 2nd round. Look on the bright side though if he goes high then he pushes another quality pick down lower to us. |
It could also potentially give us a trading partner so we can move in to round 2 and scoop up extra picks. Right now I really want us to trade down to right around 35-40 range and take either Hopkins or Patton. |
Hypothetically, IF we traded down from #27 to 35ish, realistically what could we get for such a trade? Could we gain an early 3rd as well, or have to settle for a 4th? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kenney 
Joined: 24 Dec 2006 Posts: 11369
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Wolf6151 wrote: | | LORK 88 wrote: | | Wolf6151 wrote: | | lumberjackchris wrote: | http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/07/draft-buzz-builds-around-e-j-manuel/
Noooooooooo |
I'm guessing you really wanted him for the Texans in the 2nd round. Look on the bright side though if he goes high then he pushes another quality pick down lower to us. |
It could also potentially give us a trading partner so we can move in to round 2 and scoop up extra picks. Right now I really want us to trade down to right around 35-40 range and take either Hopkins or Patton. |
Hypothetically, IF we traded down from #27 to 35ish, realistically what could we get for such a trade? Could we gain an early 3rd as well, or have to settle for a 4th? |
If we traded into the 2nd from pick 27, I'd want us to throw in our third and fourth and take their 2nd and next year's 1st. _________________ Welcome to Houston, DeAndre Hopkins! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
treece300e
Joined: 29 Jul 2011 Posts: 269 Location: Nampa, ID
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kenney wrote: | | Wolf6151 wrote: | | LORK 88 wrote: | | Wolf6151 wrote: | | lumberjackchris wrote: | http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/07/draft-buzz-builds-around-e-j-manuel/
Noooooooooo |
I'm guessing you really wanted him for the Texans in the 2nd round. Look on the bright side though if he goes high then he pushes another quality pick down lower to us. |
It could also potentially give us a trading partner so we can move in to round 2 and scoop up extra picks. Right now I really want us to trade down to right around 35-40 range and take either Hopkins or Patton. |
Hypothetically, IF we traded down from #27 to 35ish, realistically what could we get for such a trade? Could we gain an early 3rd as well, or have to settle for a 4th? |
If we traded into the 2nd from pick 27, I'd want us to throw in our third and fourth and take their 2nd and next year's 1st. |
While it may be a little antiquated, the draft pick Trade Value Chart would indicate that our #27 pick is worth 680 points, while the #42 and #74 pick would equate to 700 points. So according to that chart, we could trade to the #10-13 pick. Tampa Bay and Buffalo would probably be the most likely trade partners. Buffalo really needs an WLB, and they could use Jarvis Jones who could play a position similar to Von Miller in their scheme. Still a bit of a reach though. QB is also a possibility, if any of this year's "good" QBs fall like Glennon or Barkley, Buffalo may be willing to trade up. The only problem is that Denver follows us, and they don't really need a QB. NE may be thinking about a QB, but I doubt they'll take one in the first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kidnextdoor
Joined: 14 Jan 2013 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| C. Patterson looks like he will fall to 27 I hope we don't draft him... Austin and Allen will be gone by then..... Hunter hopefully wont, I think he is worth our 27 pick, if he is not there then we draft K. Short or trade out of the first to get as many 2nd and 3rd rounders.... don't think that Hopkins is worth a 1st round pick would be happy to spend the 57th pick on him though... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
amazingandre 
Joined: 16 Dec 2007 Posts: 13376 Location: Elkhorn, WI
|
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kidnextdoor wrote: | | C. Patterson looks like he will fall to 27 I hope we don't draft him... Austin and Allen will be gone by then..... Hunter hopefully wont, I think he is worth our 27 pick, if he is not there then we draft K. Short or trade out of the first to get as many 2nd and 3rd rounders.... don't think that Hopkins is worth a 1st round pick would be happy to spend the 57th pick on him though... |
I dont see Patterson falling that far _________________
]
Adopt a Texan :Trindon Holliday
15.7 per attempt KR / 14 per attempt PR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Underwood 
Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 2280 Location: Texans Nation
|
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kidnextdoor wrote: | | C. Patterson looks like he will fall to 27 I hope we don't draft him... Austin and Allen will be gone by then..... Hunter hopefully wont, I think he is worth our 27 pick, if he is not there then we draft K. Short or trade out of the first to get as many 2nd and 3rd rounders.... don't think that Hopkins is worth a 1st round pick would be happy to spend the 57th pick on him though... |
I hope Patterson doesn't fall that far. As far as receivers go, I'm all aboard the Hunter train. _________________
Sig by Eaglezphan21 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|