| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DT58_lives_on
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 5006
Location: St. Cloud, MN
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:51 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Nic, glad you chimed in. Sometimes I wonder if these guys on the sports shows even think about stuff like that. My first thought was the same as yours, that we'd have a massive hit. We honestly would lose a lot of money by cutting him looking at your numbers, so then Joeckl at RT makes even less sense.
_________________
Props to Loto...the guy does great work |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flexx
Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 739
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| KCWolf1 wrote: | | Flexx wrote: | | KCWolf1 wrote: | | Good work by the new regime today. Really hope this ends all the Joeckel talk. |
Well you can wish that, I don't. Not sure the Chiefs will either. He still may be the BPA in there minds. |
You want to pay $9.66 million to our LG? Or do you want us to use the #1 pick on a LT that will sit for a year? Neither of those scenarios make any sense to me. |
No, I don't but the Chiefs may. It doesn't have to make sense to you or to me only to the organization. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nicfre2011
Joined: 15 Mar 2011
Posts: 5306
Location: SC
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Flexx wrote: | | KCWolf1 wrote: | | Flexx wrote: | | KCWolf1 wrote: | | Good work by the new regime today. Really hope this ends all the Joeckel talk. |
Well you can wish that, I don't. Not sure the Chiefs will either. He still may be the BPA in there minds. |
You want to pay $9.66 million to our LG? Or do you want us to use the #1 pick on a LT that will sit for a year? Neither of those scenarios make any sense to me. |
No, I don't but the Chiefs may. It doesn't have to make sense to you or to me only to the organization. |
Going along with that line of thought (and not necessarily advocating for this at all just trying to think of all of the roster possibilities), but maybe the Chiefs could keep Albert at LT and IF they draft Joeckel or Fisher for example, they could have Joeckel/Fisher play LG in 2013. At that point Stephenson would have another year of experience under his belt (albeit not starting in this scenario) and Joeckel/Fisher could potentially compete with Stephenson for the starting LT role (with the idea that Stephenson would end up being a swing-tackle). This is definitely outside-of-the-box and at first I was wondering what Reid would think of a 6'-6" (Joeckel) or 6'-7" (Fisher) guard but then I remembered that Todd Herremans has played guard and tackle for the Eagles.
_________________
Thanks to ryknowssd for the sig!
Trent Baalke for 2013 NFL executive of the year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bigschmadt00
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 10576
Location: Seeing what condition my condition is in
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Todd Herremans, that dude's a hack. 
_________________
^ryknowssd on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BrotherlyLove
Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 2125
Location: San Lorenzo
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bigschmadt00 wrote: | | Todd Herremans, that dude's a hack. |
Umm no. he's been a very good lineman at multiple positions for the Eagles for years |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KCWolf1
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 7618
Location: KC
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Flexx wrote: | | KCWolf1 wrote: | | Flexx wrote: | | KCWolf1 wrote: | | Good work by the new regime today. Really hope this ends all the Joeckel talk. |
Well you can wish that, I don't. Not sure the Chiefs will either. He still may be the BPA in there minds. |
You want to pay $9.66 million to our LG? Or do you want us to use the #1 pick on a LT that will sit for a year? Neither of those scenarios make any sense to me. |
No, I don't but the Chiefs may. It doesn't have to make sense to you or to me only to the organization. |
I said that I hope it ends the talk of Joeckel and then you said you don't. That would imply that you want to do those things. Either way, I never said that it is impossible that we still take Joeckel. All I said was that I hope the talk of it ends. Seems like everybody that has replied to my post has that confused.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flexx
Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 739
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| KCWolf1 wrote: | | Flexx wrote: | | KCWolf1 wrote: | | Flexx wrote: | | KCWolf1 wrote: | | Good work by the new regime today. Really hope this ends all the Joeckel talk. |
Well you can wish that, I don't. Not sure the Chiefs will either. He still may be the BPA in there minds. |
You want to pay $9.66 million to our LG? Or do you want us to use the #1 pick on a LT that will sit for a year? Neither of those scenarios make any sense to me. |
No, I don't but the Chiefs may. It doesn't have to make sense to you or to me only to the organization. |
I said that I hope it ends the talk of Joeckel and then you said you don't. That would imply that you want to do those things. Either way, I never said that it is impossible that we still take Joeckel. All I said was that I hope the talk of it ends. Seems like everybody that has replied to my post has that confused. |
No, I don't want to do anything. I would like the Chiefs to not rule him out as yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
