| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SupeRG00F
Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 989
Location: Vancouver, Wa
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:40 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Tatupu_64 wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.
I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system. |
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles. |
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.
Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view. 
I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is.
_________________
Kam Chancellor-2012/2013 Season - 100 tackles - 1 FF - 2 FR - 0 INT
Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tatupu_64
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 17049
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SupeRG00F wrote: | | Tatupu_64 wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.
I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system. |
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles. |
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.
Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view.
I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is. |
You brought up the 100 tackles, that's certainly a product of the system. In the right system, he's an exceptional player. In the wrong one, he'd be an awful SS. Maybe a good OLB though.
_________________
Props to the Ramster
Seattle's Original Bruce Irvin Supporter
ET and Mebane's Biggest Supporter
FFMD2 13 GM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SupeRG00F
Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 989
Location: Vancouver, Wa
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tatupu_64 wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | | Tatupu_64 wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.
I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system. |
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles. |
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.
Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view.
I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is. |
You brought up the 100 tackles, that's certainly a product of the system. In the right system, he's an exceptional player. In the wrong one, he'd be an awful SS. Maybe a good OLB though. |
How can you say he's a product of the system because of the tackles. He has to actually make the tackle to get it.
_________________
Kam Chancellor-2012/2013 Season - 100 tackles - 1 FF - 2 FR - 0 INT
Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tatupu_64
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 17049
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SupeRG00F wrote: | | Tatupu_64 wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | | Tatupu_64 wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.
I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system. |
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles. |
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.
Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view.
I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is. |
You brought up the 100 tackles, that's certainly a product of the system. In the right system, he's an exceptional player. In the wrong one, he'd be an awful SS. Maybe a good OLB though. |
How can you say he's a product of the system because of the tackles. He has to actually make the tackle to get it. |
??? The tackles are a product of the system.
You're making this too complicated. Kam is a better player in our scheme than he would be in others, that's all we're saying.
_________________
Props to the Ramster
Seattle's Original Bruce Irvin Supporter
ET and Mebane's Biggest Supporter
FFMD2 13 GM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pie Romania
Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 251
Location: Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tatupu_64 wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | | Tatupu_64 wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | | Tatupu_64 wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.
I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system. |
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles. |
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.
Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view.
I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is. |
You brought up the 100 tackles, that's certainly a product of the system. In the right system, he's an exceptional player. In the wrong one, he'd be an awful SS. Maybe a good OLB though. |
How can you say he's a product of the system because of the tackles. He has to actually make the tackle to get it. |
??? The tackles are a product of the system.
You're making this too complicated. Kam is a better player in our scheme than he would be in others, that's all we're saying. |
Agreed. It's nothing against Kam. He is perfect for what we ask him to do. I mean, he was a late round pick for a reason. He's not the prototypical safety out there and he has some major flaws, but in our system, those flaws have less of a chance of being exploited. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
