Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Trade Value?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Seattle Seahawks
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SupeRG00F


Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 1424
Location: Vancouver, Wa
PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
SupeRG00F wrote:
I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.

I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system.
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles.
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.

Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view. Wink

I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is.
_________________


Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 21691
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SupeRG00F wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
SupeRG00F wrote:
I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.

I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system.
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles.
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.

Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view. Wink

I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is.
You brought up the 100 tackles, that's certainly a product of the system. In the right system, he's an exceptional player. In the wrong one, he'd be an awful SS. Maybe a good OLB though.
_________________
<Ram
BlaqOptic wrote:
...13 Seahawks one spot over the 08 Steelers

ram29jackson wrote:
LO freaking L...Seahawks aren't repeating crap and you can book that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SupeRG00F


Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 1424
Location: Vancouver, Wa
PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
SupeRG00F wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
SupeRG00F wrote:
I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.

I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system.
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles.
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.

Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view. Wink

I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is.
You brought up the 100 tackles, that's certainly a product of the system. In the right system, he's an exceptional player. In the wrong one, he'd be an awful SS. Maybe a good OLB though.
How can you say he's a product of the system because of the tackles. He has to actually make the tackle to get it.
_________________


Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 21691
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SupeRG00F wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
SupeRG00F wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
SupeRG00F wrote:
I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.

I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system.
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles.
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.

Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view. Wink

I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is.
You brought up the 100 tackles, that's certainly a product of the system. In the right system, he's an exceptional player. In the wrong one, he'd be an awful SS. Maybe a good OLB though.
How can you say he's a product of the system because of the tackles. He has to actually make the tackle to get it.
??? The tackles are a product of the system.

You're making this too complicated. Kam is a better player in our scheme than he would be in others, that's all we're saying.
_________________
<Ram
BlaqOptic wrote:
...13 Seahawks one spot over the 08 Steelers

ram29jackson wrote:
LO freaking L...Seahawks aren't repeating crap and you can book that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pie Romania


Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 1828
Location: Seattle, WA
PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
SupeRG00F wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
SupeRG00F wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
SupeRG00F wrote:
I don't see how Kam is a product of the system. You could plug someone else in there but I don't think they'd have the same production. 100 tackles for a safety isn't common.

I would be pretty depressed if he was let go/traded and am trying not to make excuses for him to be recognized as someone we can't lose. I know Sherm and Earl are much more important to the team than Kam, but he isn't a product of the system.
Seattle lets Kam play as a 4th LB most of the time. He's in a position to wrap up a lot of tackles.
Yes. Do you think that means he's a product of the system or doing what the team is asking him to do? Everyone knows Kam can not be a deep safety (excpet everyone who posts in General), it limits how you can use him on D, but when he's used in the middle of the field while Earl covers deep, or against TE's, or to play the LOS he excels.

Or I just don't pay attention and am letting my man crush fog my view. Wink

I wish I had access to rewatch all last seasons games to see if my memory is as good as I think it is.
You brought up the 100 tackles, that's certainly a product of the system. In the right system, he's an exceptional player. In the wrong one, he'd be an awful SS. Maybe a good OLB though.
How can you say he's a product of the system because of the tackles. He has to actually make the tackle to get it.
??? The tackles are a product of the system.

You're making this too complicated. Kam is a better player in our scheme than he would be in others, that's all we're saying.


Agreed. It's nothing against Kam. He is perfect for what we ask him to do. I mean, he was a late round pick for a reason. He's not the prototypical safety out there and he has some major flaws, but in our system, those flaws have less of a chance of being exploited.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Seattle Seahawks All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group