jeremy parnell

cowboys_50 · Joined: 09 Jan 2013 Posts: 35

I thought he played well when he hot a chance the reason I think we don't need a tackle in the first three rounds.

What are your thoughts?

Texas_OutLaw7 · Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:46 pm Post subject:

I don't think he should preclude us from landing an Elite OT, should the opportunity present itself.

But at the same token, I am good with rolling with either him (or Free - should he wake up this off-season) and focusing on the interior OL instead.
_________________

In Redball I Trust!
The price of progress is trusting the process.
Heart. Leadership. Passion. Will.

cowboys_50 · Joined: 09 Jan 2013 Posts: 35

matt79511 · Joined: 10 Jul 2011 Posts: 2226

He doesn't give me much confidence as a starter next season. But, the team has very serious salary cap issues, and some sacrifices must be made. If they address interior OL, DL, and S, and don't have the resources to do much more... I could live with him at RT. He got some fairly extensive playing time and didn't embarrass himself.
_________________

CowboysTilIDie · Joined: 09 Jan 2012 Posts: 2369 Location: Amarillo, TX

If one of the top 3 Tackles fall to us (Joeckel, Fisher, or Lane Johnson), I believe we take him. If not, I believe we go OG/DT.
_________________

Official Supporter of bringing back the 4-3 Defense.

Official Supporter of "The Process."

Nextyearfordaboyz · Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 16250

Like others have said, if an OT is clearly BPA, you have to take him. But I'm comfortable rolling the dice on Parnell if that doesn't happen. Too many other needs to force the issue there.
_________________