| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kilgannon
Joined: 12 Dec 2012 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:42 pm Post subject: Kilgannon's before combine mock |
|
|
|
Trade 1-17 with Vikings for 1-23, 3-21, 5-22
1-17 = 950pts
1-23 = 760pts, 3-21 = 165pts, 5-22 = 31pts: total of 956pts
1 – FS – D.J. Swearinger – South Carolina 6-0/210
2 – WR – DeAndre Hopkins – Clemson 6-0/200
3 – OLB – Chase Thomas – Stanford 6-4/250
3 – DE – Joe Kruger – Utah 6-7/285
4 – OT – Reid Fragel – Ohio State 6-7/300
5 – SS – Shamarko Thomas – Syracuse 5-10/210
5 – OG – Brian Winters – Kent State 6-3/300
6 – TE – Jake Stoneburner – Ohio State 6-5/245
7 – WR – Duron Carter – FAU 6-5/205
7 – RB – D.J. Harper – Boise State 5-9/200
*Sign in FA*
FA – Larry Grant – ILB
FA – Keenan Lewis – CB
FA – Rashard Mendenhall – RB
FA – Brian Hoyer – QB
*Release*
Willie Colon – OL
*Restructure*
Ben Roethlisberger – QB
Lamar Woodley – OLB
Lawrence Timmons – ILB
Antonio Brown – WR
Troy Polamalu – SS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jebrick
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 7125 Location: Indianapolis
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
My head would explode if the Steelers took Swearinger in the 1st. Way too early for him
I love Kruger and Hopkins. The rest... meh. _________________
"You build with draft choices. You find people with talents adaptable to your plans and then you teach them to do things the way we do them." - Chuck Noll |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FourThreeMafia 
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 39988 Location: East of Sixburgh
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hate Swearinger in the 1st round.
The rest is solid, for the most part.
Why would we draft another DE early? We already have one we dont use enough.
NT is a much bigger need than DE at this point. _________________
| cluelessororke wrote: | | I am going to laugh in your face when they don't even sniff WR until day three of the draft |
Still waiting for your laugh.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
at23steelers
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 3721 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Change Swearinger to Jesse Wiliams and poof! solid draft!! If we drafted Swearinger in the 1st, you're username is right. Maybe Rich Gannon would be killed!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefan52268 
Joined: 14 Apr 2010 Posts: 6491 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I agree with Jebrick about Swearinger plus I don't think they would restructure Troy. He only has 2 years left on his contract and a restructure would hand cuff them with the cap in 2014. Now I could see them give him an extension.
I do like Shamarko Thomas. I'm not sold on Chase Thomas and I think Brian Winters will be gone in the 4th. _________________
Props to Lyasr529 on the sweet sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wwhickok 
Joined: 27 Nov 2012 Posts: 2247 Location: Williamsport, PA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The only thing I dont like about this mock is the first round pick. Too early for him i agree. As stated, replace him with Williams and its a very good draft. I actually like Chase Thomas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steelers75
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 718
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:07 pm Post subject: draft |
|
|
|
| i would draft jesse williams in rd 1, johnathan franklin rb in rd 3 then change your 7th rd rb to whoever. like 43 said why draft another de when we dont utilize the one we have. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steelers8031
Joined: 22 Jan 2013 Posts: 25 Location: Upstate NY
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The only picks I'm in love with are Hopkins in 2, Thomas in 5, and Stoneburner in 6. Swearinger is a 3rd rounder, probably 6th or 7th safety off the board. Hate the idea of taking Williams in 1, because I firmly believe he will be there in 2. And for those of you who disagree with me, one word: Ta'amu. Boards were lighting up because we didn't take him in the second last year, when we ended up with him in the 4th. Nose tackles, unless incredibly elite (or a workout wonder) just don't have the value. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|