Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Darrelle Revis
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 10, 11, 12  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
HyponGrey


Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 3736
Location: Down the road from NFL Films
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wgbeethree wrote:
spilltray wrote:
There is no level any sort of scenario to acquire Revis makes any sense at all to me. It's just a bad idea no matter how you slice it.


I 100% agree, butů it is POSSIBLE.
Scientifically, there comes a point where the number is so small that it might as well be zero, so we treat it as zero.
_________________
justo wrote:
Bostick drove a guy 12 yards and finished off with a pancake and I'm not sure where my pants went.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PossibleCabbage


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 3306
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's entirely possible that as you sleep tonight, all of the air molecules will congregate in the top half of the room, and you will asphyxiate in your sleep.

The chance of that is something like 1/(2^ (5.22*10^23)), but that number is not zero!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
persiandud


Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 1067
Location: Davis, CA
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PossibleCabbage wrote:
It's entirely possible that as you sleep tonight, all of the air molecules will congregate in the top half of the room, and you will asphyxiate in your sleep.

The chance of that is something like 1/(2^ (5.22*10^23)), but that number is not zero!


So...you're saying we have a chance? Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Csraverage


Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 280
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

persiandud wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
It's entirely possible that as you sleep tonight, all of the air molecules will congregate in the top half of the room, and you will asphyxiate in your sleep.

The chance of that is something like 1/(2^ (5.22*10^23)), but that number is not zero!


So...you're saying we have a chance? Smile


Easy Lloyd Christmas... Laughing
_________________
"We don't need luck, Jay will throw us the ball."

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
svp


Joined: 11 Sep 2011
Posts: 1165
Location: I took a football shaped pill and felt better.
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


_________________
svp wrote:
Who cares?


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brad Gluckman


Joined: 02 Jul 2008
Posts: 127
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having Revis wouldn't have changed the outcome of our playoff loss to SF. This is one of those moves that looks great on paper, but isn't as effective as one would have hoped when it actually happens.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
persiandud


Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 1067
Location: Davis, CA
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brad Gluckman wrote:
Having Revis wouldn't have changed the outcome of our playoff loss to SF. This is one of those moves that looks great on paper, but isn't as effective as one would have hoped when it actually happens.


You don't know that. Revis could have shut down Crabtree, who had 119 yards and 2 TD's.

Score was 45-31, if you don't recall.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brad Gluckman


Joined: 02 Jul 2008
Posts: 127
PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

persiandud wrote:
Brad Gluckman wrote:
Having Revis wouldn't have changed the outcome of our playoff loss to SF. This is one of those moves that looks great on paper, but isn't as effective as one would have hoped when it actually happens.


You don't know that. Revis could have shut down Crabtree, who had 119 yards and 2 TD's.

Score was 45-31, if you don't recall.


You're right, I don't know that.

I guess what I'm saying is the defense let up what?...300 yds rushing? Crabtree wasn't the problem in that game, Kaepernick and Gore were.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gbpacker40


Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 2283
Location: Milwaukee
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we are giving up draft picks for secondary help, I would rather try to lure Jarius Byrd away from Buffalo, granted he is indeed franchised.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kal-El


Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3837
Location: Milwaukee, WI. Team: Packers.
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

persiandud wrote:
Brad Gluckman wrote:
Having Revis wouldn't have changed the outcome of our playoff loss to SF. This is one of those moves that looks great on paper, but isn't as effective as one would have hoped when it actually happens.


You don't know that. Revis could have shut down Crabtree, who had 119 yards and 2 TD's.

Score was 45-31, if you don't recall.


lol.

It's never that simple in football.
_________________
Lorde wrote:
And this is the ~ red, orange, yellow flicker beat - beat - beat - beat ..

<33333333
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
persiandud


Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 1067
Location: Davis, CA
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kal-El wrote:
persiandud wrote:
Brad Gluckman wrote:
Having Revis wouldn't have changed the outcome of our playoff loss to SF. This is one of those moves that looks great on paper, but isn't as effective as one would have hoped when it actually happens.


You don't know that. Revis could have shut down Crabtree, who had 119 yards and 2 TD's.

Score was 45-31, if you don't recall.


lol.

It's never that simple in football.


Of course not, but you can't deny he would have made our defense a lot better. I think it's a stretch to say he wouldn't have affected the outcome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spilltray


Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 10637
Location: Green Bay, WI
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

persiandud wrote:
Kal-El wrote:
persiandud wrote:
Brad Gluckman wrote:
Having Revis wouldn't have changed the outcome of our playoff loss to SF. This is one of those moves that looks great on paper, but isn't as effective as one would have hoped when it actually happens.


You don't know that. Revis could have shut down Crabtree, who had 119 yards and 2 TD's.

Score was 45-31, if you don't recall.


lol.

It's never that simple in football.


Of course not, but you can't deny he would have made our defense a lot better. I think it's a stretch to say he wouldn't have affected the outcome.


Revis of 23 years ago would have maybe makes the defense better, but I doubt it's that huge of an impact. Even vs Revis, guys are going to get open eventually. Revis of last year? On IR. Revis of next year? Who's to say how close he is to form. One thing is certain, it's going to take both a huge deal and trade package to try and find out.

That's not a gamble I'm willing to take considering the relative overall strength of the CBs on the roster.
_________________
Wilfred wrote:
Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
palmy50


Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 13910
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm a bit shocked this one ran over ten pages deep. Man Packers fans are a sick breed..... Laughing

No way that boy becomes a Packer though IMO. I'm not real sure there is a team that he makes less sence for to tell the truth. Money is going to be tight in the very near future and there is a ton of young talent in that CB group!
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CWood21


Moderator
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 35713
Location: 'Merica
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

palmy50 wrote:
No way that boy becomes a Packer though IMO. I'm not real sure there is a team that he makes less sence for to tell the truth. Money is going to be tight in the very near future and there is a ton of young talent in that CB group!


Pretty much sums up my thoughts as well.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
nfldraftguru1


Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 10182
Location: Whitewater, WI
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

palmy50 wrote:
I'm a bit shocked this one ran over ten pages deep. Man Packers fans are a sick breed..... Laughing

No way that boy becomes a Packer though IMO. I'm not real sure there is a team that he makes less sence for to tell the truth. Money is going to be tight in the very near future and there is a ton of young talent in that CB group!

We get bored. Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 10, 11, 12  Next
Page 11 of 12

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group