| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tonykola
Joined: 20 Dec 2012
Posts: 92
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:28 pm Post subject: trade |
 |
|
|
| the chargers should trade there 1st 2nd and forth to the lions for fisher to protect rivers if they don't the lions will pick him at 5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The LBC
Joined: 12 Jan 2008
Posts: 34959
Location: Where We Can't Have Nice Things
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:57 pm Post subject: Re: trade |
|
|
|
| tonykola wrote: | | the chargers should trade there 1st 2nd and forth to the lions for fisher to protect rivers if they don't the lions will pick him at 5 |
Um... no. We have a GM that preaches the same philosophies as yours does (BPA and not reaching to fill needs). So why then would we trade away our two most premium picks when our OL is more than a single piece away from being remotely good.
I'm a big Eric Fisher fan, would be head over heels if we selected him at 11 if he's there, but he's not Matt Kalil or Joe Thomas. Those guys merit trading up into the Top 5 for; just because a guy is the top player at his position in his draft class doesn't mean he's worth trading away the farm to acquire.
This sounds more like you just don't like the value that your team is getting at your Top 5 pick and are looking for any easy solution to not move very far back but get maximum value. It might make sense for your club - it doesn't for ours.
_________________
| MathMan wrote: | | I think I'm obfuscating all over the place! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
