| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
La_Vader
Joined: 04 Jan 2013
Posts: 182
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:20 am Post subject: Mike Brisel |
 |
|
|
Can the smallish g play in a power scheme. I know he player hurt buy can he thrive in this system
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jamethus92
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 4493
Location: Colorado Springs
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:23 am Post subject: Re: Mike Brisel |
|
|
|
| La_Vader wrote: | | Can the smallish g play in a power scheme. I know he player hurt buy can he thrive in this system |
Not looking too good for Mike here unless they decide they'd rather pay him to play in a system he isn't really suited for than pay him for nothing.
Also, spell check man. Or just quickly glance at the text before submitting. I'm not usually a stickler for this kind of thing but that sentence is an abomination.
_________________
Kiltman on the new sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baggabonez
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3745
Location: RaiderNation
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm expecting an injury release during TC. If Brisiel is fully healthy and makes the team he'll be Carlisle 2.0 for the duration of his stay in Oakland, a constant irritant holdover from an abandon system. Again, it has statistically been proven you don't need great OG play to win games if you have bookend OTs, if you have great OGs sans OTs then u still gots nothing. OTs > OG x 50.
_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10586
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:59 am Post subject: Re: Mike Brisel |
|
|
|
| La_Vader wrote: | | Can the smallish g play in a power scheme. I know he player hurt buy can he thrive in this system |
He is 6-5, 310. That is taller and bigger than Wiz (6-3, 307). Its all about technique. Is he strong enough and can he pick up the technique after spending so much time in the ZBS. With Brisiel its not so much about size though.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bitty
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 2985
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| He was hurt for 2 1/2 years out of 3. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oakdb36
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 12720
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well, he's our most expensive OLineman and he has played in a ZBS his whole career. He's also a bit injury prone. He came with Knapp and Pollack who are now gone. There are many reasons to get rid of him now.
_________________
| Plush wrote: | | Papa was a trolling stone |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr.Bob Dobalina
Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Posts: 1378
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:50 am Post subject: Re: Mike Brisel |
|
|
|
| Jamethus92 wrote: | | La_Vader wrote: | | Can the smallish g play in a power scheme. I know he player hurt buy can he thrive in this system |
Not looking too good for Mike here unless they decide they'd rather pay him to play in a system he isn't really suited for than pay him for nothing.
Also, spell check man. Or just quickly glance at the text before submitting. I'm not usually a stickler for this kind of thing but that sentence is an abomination. |
lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7218
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oakdb36 wrote: | | Well, he's our most expensive OLineman and he has played in a ZBS his whole career. He's also a bit injury prone. He came with Knapp and Pollack who are now gone. There are many reasons to get rid of him now. |
Good post and agreed. Good bye.
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10586
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He may be a casualty of what the OC and new OL coach want in their guys. The real issue is what to do with him and his cap acceleration. We can't really depend on him being traded for anything of substance. That would be a gift if it happens.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
holyghost
Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 5302
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DOCLEW 28 wrote: | | He may be a casualty of what the OC and new OL coach want in their guys. The real issue is what to do with him and his cap acceleration. We can't really depend on him being traded for anything of substance. That would be a gift if it happens. |
No trade, I don't even know that he's gone but like you said it depends to some degree on cap stuff.
I think if someone else is just a better player (Nix, Bergstrom, or draft addition) noone will be there to make a stink about keeping him around. I think in many ways, personnel decisions rule the roost. I.E. talent wins out. If someone is markedly better, Brisiel will get the ax one way or another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
101Raider
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 2068
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DOCLEW 28 wrote: | | He may be a casualty of what the OC and new OL coach want in their guys. The real issue is what to do with him and his cap acceleration. We can't really depend on him being traded for anything of substance. That would be a gift if it happens. |
His contract gave a lot of people pause when it was announced. 20 million for 5? I know I wasn't as pleased as a few. However, looking at the way it structured was pretty ingenious. He cost us very little year 1 and we are able to cut him this year for some cap relief.
If this is accurate, his base this year is 4.35 million. He signed a 3.5 mil signing bonus averaging 680,000 a year. Accelerated bonus is 2.72 mil.
Meaning if we cut him we save 1.63 mil. In hindsight not the best player hire, but pretty good contract structuring in my mind. I say nice job Reggie.
http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/oakland-raiders/mike-brisiel/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10586
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Very nice job indeed to be able to actually save money by getting rid of a guy. And he was a pretty good signing for the scheme they wanted to use seeing as knapp came from houston and brought him here. The scheme just didn't fit here and he was hurt for most of the season. If we go with an OG in the draft and he isn't in the top three at the position (on either side) then he has to go and that money can be used to sign draft picks and UDFA's. And it wouldn't be a big loss if he were outplayed by the younger ballplayers.
If we were able to land Barrett Jones it would give us so much versatility with whatever combination they wanted to use at OC and OG with he and Wiz. It is pretty exciting to think about all the possibilities.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dreadymatt
Joined: 05 Feb 2010
Posts: 756
Location: Saturn
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| i got a feelin he'll come good this year |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lilcrazycat1
Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 899
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dreadymatt wrote: | | i got a feelin he'll come good this year |
gotta feeling he's gone.. not worth the money, doesn't fit the scheme. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dreadymatt
Joined: 05 Feb 2010
Posts: 756
Location: Saturn
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| try and forget last year, whole offense was a mess, take your mind back a year, the lad had talent at ZBS but is big enough to potentially play the PBS/ZBS hybrid that we are apparently set to play....under an imporved OL I feel he will be more than serviceable |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
