| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73469
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:02 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | dswinton wrote: | | Roman go to philly he may want to keep Vick and do the read option. Who better to the read option than Vick the original. |
A good QB maybe? |
he is still better than what we got |
I'd take Gabbert before Vick. |
Really? 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15072
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | dswinton wrote: | | Roman go to philly he may want to keep Vick and do the read option. Who better to the read option than Vick the original. |
A good QB maybe? |
he is still better than what we got |
I'd take Gabbert before Vick. |
Really? |
I agree with him. Vick has had one good season in his career. I'd rather roll with the young guy and have a better idea where we stand than rely on an old guy who has never been that good and would probably get hurt anyway.
_________________
Sig Credit: ChrisC21325 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaguarfan
Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11345
Location: Scarlet Town
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | dswinton wrote: | | Roman go to philly he may want to keep Vick and do the read option. Who better to the read option than Vick the original. |
A good QB maybe? |
he is still better than what we got |
I'd take Gabbert before Vick. |
Really? |
Neither are good, but Gabbert is younger, less injury prone, and has more potential.
So yes.
_________________
Kempes on the sig
| TheVillain112 wrote: | | Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73469
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | dswinton wrote: | | Roman go to philly he may want to keep Vick and do the read option. Who better to the read option than Vick the original. |
A good QB maybe? |
he is still better than what we got |
I'd take Gabbert before Vick. |
Really? |
Neither are good, but Gabbert is younger, less injury prone, and has more potential.
So yes. |
So right now, for 1 game who would you take?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaguarfan
Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11345
Location: Scarlet Town
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | dswinton wrote: | | Roman go to philly he may want to keep Vick and do the read option. Who better to the read option than Vick the original. |
A good QB maybe? |
he is still better than what we got |
I'd take Gabbert before Vick. |
Really? |
Neither are good, but Gabbert is younger, less injury prone, and has more potential.
So yes. |
So right now, for 1 game who would you take? |
For 1 game? I dunno. Who am I playing? Am I with the Jaguars?
_________________
Kempes on the sig
| TheVillain112 wrote: | | Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5754
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | So right now, for 1 game who would you take? |
For one game, both players being healthy, Vick is an easy choice. Moving forward is an entirely different story, as is for an entire season.
A healthy Michael Vick is a very dynamic player.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tugboat
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Posts: 1309
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | So right now, for 1 game who would you take? |
For one game, both players being healthy, Vick is an easy choice. Moving forward is an entirely different story, as is for an entire season.
A healthy Michael Vick is a very dynamic player. |
Honestly, in some ways it makes sense to try out Vick. See what he can do here. When he's on and healthy, he's definitely the sort of dynamic QB we're looking for.
Realistically, we try him for a few games, then he does his usual schtick and gets injured...and we're back to Henne/Gabbert duking it out for tallest midget.
Best case...Vick actually makes this offense scary. Most of us have hinted at wanting a mobile dual-threat QB. Vick is one that could come for free...other than cap space. But if many are willing to throw cap space away on Alex Smith, why not give Vick a try? At his best, Vick is vastly more dynamic as a QB than Smith...and at his worst? he's just injured. no harm, no foul i guess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5754
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tugboat wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | So right now, for 1 game who would you take? |
For one game, both players being healthy, Vick is an easy choice. Moving forward is an entirely different story, as is for an entire season.
A healthy Michael Vick is a very dynamic player. |
Honestly, in some ways it makes sense to try out Vick. See what he can do here. When he's on and healthy, he's definitely the sort of dynamic QB we're looking for.
Realistically, we try him for a few games, then he does his usual schtick and gets injured...and we're back to Henne/Gabbert duking it out for tallest midget.
Best case...Vick actually makes this offense scary. Most of us have hinted at wanting a mobile dual-threat QB. Vick is one that could come for free...other than cap space. But if many are willing to throw cap space away on Alex Smith, why not give Vick a try? At his best, Vick is vastly more dynamic as a QB than Smith...and at his worst? he's just injured. no harm, no foul i guess. |
He's a heck of an upgrade over Henne, but I definitely wouldn't want him going into the season as a starter - he's way too injury and turnover prone. But bringing him in as a backup/package guy would have its perks.
Still don't want him though.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tugboat
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Posts: 1309
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | Tugboat wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | So right now, for 1 game who would you take? |
For one game, both players being healthy, Vick is an easy choice. Moving forward is an entirely different story, as is for an entire season.
A healthy Michael Vick is a very dynamic player. |
Honestly, in some ways it makes sense to try out Vick. See what he can do here. When he's on and healthy, he's definitely the sort of dynamic QB we're looking for.
Realistically, we try him for a few games, then he does his usual schtick and gets injured...and we're back to Henne/Gabbert duking it out for tallest midget.
Best case...Vick actually makes this offense scary. Most of us have hinted at wanting a mobile dual-threat QB. Vick is one that could come for free...other than cap space. But if many are willing to throw cap space away on Alex Smith, why not give Vick a try? At his best, Vick is vastly more dynamic as a QB than Smith...and at his worst? he's just injured. no harm, no foul i guess. |
He's a heck of an upgrade over Henne, but I definitely wouldn't want him going into the season as a starter - he's way too injury and turnover prone. But bringing him in as a backup/package guy would have its perks.
Still don't want him though. |
Yeah. I don't really want him or anything. He's not the future, and he'd probably end up bringing more of a circus that it's worth. But i'm just saying...if we're interested in the idea of Alex Smith... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5754
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tugboat wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | Tugboat wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | So right now, for 1 game who would you take? |
For one game, both players being healthy, Vick is an easy choice. Moving forward is an entirely different story, as is for an entire season.
A healthy Michael Vick is a very dynamic player. |
Honestly, in some ways it makes sense to try out Vick. See what he can do here. When he's on and healthy, he's definitely the sort of dynamic QB we're looking for.
Realistically, we try him for a few games, then he does his usual schtick and gets injured...and we're back to Henne/Gabbert duking it out for tallest midget.
Best case...Vick actually makes this offense scary. Most of us have hinted at wanting a mobile dual-threat QB. Vick is one that could come for free...other than cap space. But if many are willing to throw cap space away on Alex Smith, why not give Vick a try? At his best, Vick is vastly more dynamic as a QB than Smith...and at his worst? he's just injured. no harm, no foul i guess. |
He's a heck of an upgrade over Henne, but I definitely wouldn't want him going into the season as a starter - he's way too injury and turnover prone. But bringing him in as a backup/package guy would have its perks.
Still don't want him though. |
Yeah. I don't really want him or anything. He's not the future, and he'd probably end up bringing more of a circus that it's worth. But i'm just saying...if we're interested in the idea of Alex Smith... |
agreed - he's a much better option than Smith. I'm not buying the speculation regardless.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73469
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | dswinton wrote: | | Roman go to philly he may want to keep Vick and do the read option. Who better to the read option than Vick the original. |
A good QB maybe? |
he is still better than what we got |
I'd take Gabbert before Vick. |
Really? |
Neither are good, but Gabbert is younger, less injury prone, and has more potential.
So yes. |
So right now, for 1 game who would you take? |
For 1 game? I dunno. Who am I playing? Am I with the Jaguars? |
Yes you are the jags and idk
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
