| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Vikefan79 
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 25122 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vike daddy wrote: | Three days after a historically pathetic performance by the Packers’ defense, Packers coach Mike McCarthy says that the man who runs the defense will be back in 2013, possibly to have another historically pathetic performance in the postseason. McCarthy told reporters on Tuesday that Dom Capers will be back. Sort of.
Via ESPN.com, McCarthy said that he is “very confident” Capers will return in 2013, but that McCarthy plans to evaluate everyone.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/15/mccarthy-confident-capers-will-be-back-as-defensive-coordinator/ |
I support this decision! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PurplePeterson
Joined: 15 Jan 2013 Posts: 550
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| They would be stupid to keep Dom for another year but I would not complain if they do! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vike daddy 

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66652
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Kevin Greene has known and worked with Dom Capers for decades, so it’s no surprise the Packers outside linebackers coach will defend his defensive coordinator. It’s the colorful manner in which he defended him which is so fantastic. Asked if Capers deserved to keep his job, Greene was adamant.
Greene: “Does a fat baby fart? Big time. Absolutely. No doubt about it. He’s the same guy that took a defense from No. 24 to No. 5, or No. 2, then the Super Bowl year we’re No. 5. He’s the same guy. This is the same system. I mean, yeah, Dom is without a doubt the right guy. I think that’s about it there.”
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/15/criticism-of-capers-gives-greene-indigestion/ _________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
disaacs 
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 19992 Location: Brownbackistan
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
While Dom certainly did a poor job that game, I don't think you can fire him on the basis of that. Let's not forget how bad the Packers' defense was under Bob Sanders. _________________
Thx to Uncle Buck! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vike daddy 

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66652
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
From the "what if" file, we take you back to the spring of 1996. Ray Lewis is a middle linebacker out of the University of Miami considered too small by many teams. The Green Bay Packers were not one of them. The Packers had already written Lewis' name on the card to be the 27th selection of the 1996 NFL Draft. The Baltimore Ravens grabbed him at No. 26 and the rest is history.
"That's what happened," Kansas City Chiefs general manager John Dorsey told Milwaukee Journal Sentinal reporter Bob McGinn. "You never know." Dorsey worked in the Packers' front office for 22 years before the Chiefs hired him after the regular season.
Green Bay took tackle John Michels instead.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000134034/article/green-bay-packers-missed-out-on-ray-lewis-by-one-pick _________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikingsrule
 Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 39531 Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Brett Favre probably would have won another ring or two if the Packers had Ray Lewis on there defense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vike daddy 

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66652
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
On Saturday night, at the NFL’s second annual postseason awards show, current Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers and former Packers quarterback Brett Favre made a joint appearance. Rodgers said Tuesday that he hopes it’s the first step in a new era between Rodgers, Favre, and the franchise.
Rodgers: “As the face of the franchise now, it's a role that I take very seriously. I have the responsibility and enjoy having the opportunity to represent my team. I think it’s important to realize that it is probably time to move forward. Brett is two years removed from the game. He’s going to obviously be in the Packers Hall of Fame. He’ll get his number retired, and he’ll be in the Pro Football Hall of Fame in the next few years. It’s important, I think, to make sure that he’s recognized for all the accomplishments that he’s achieved in our organization especially. He’s still very dear to many of our fans for the things that he’s done for the Packers on the field. You can never take that away.”
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/05/aaron-rodgers-thinks-its-time-for-favre-to-re-enter-packers-family/ _________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Klomp 
Joined: 11 Aug 2011 Posts: 3424 Location: The Home of Schwan's Ice Cream
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Packers released Charles Woodson today  _________________
2013 Adopt-a-Viking: FB Jerome Felton - |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
disaacs 
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 19992 Location: Brownbackistan
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Klomp wrote: | Packers released Charles Woodson today  |
That's interesting, although not surprising. He is 37 years old and has a huge contract. _________________
Thx to Uncle Buck! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vike daddy 

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66652
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| disaacs wrote: | | Klomp wrote: | Packers released Charles Woodson today  |
That's interesting, although not surprising. He is 37 years old and has a huge contract. |
could be one of those release and re-sign a new contract situations. _________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SteelKing728 
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 10876 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vike daddy wrote: | | disaacs wrote: | | Klomp wrote: | Packers released Charles Woodson today  |
That's interesting, although not surprising. He is 37 years old and has a huge contract. |
could be one of those release and re-sign a new contract situations. |
wouldn't it just be easier to restructure or for him to just take a pay cut (like Michael Jenkins did for us)?
I don't know...I think its the end of the line for Woodson and the Packers. _________________
Thanks Jamison on that avi.
2013 Adopt a Minnesota Viking - Jared Allen - DE - #69 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Klomp 
Joined: 11 Aug 2011 Posts: 3424 Location: The Home of Schwan's Ice Cream
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SteelKing728 wrote: | wouldn't it just be easier to restructure or for him to just take a pay cut (like Michael Jenkins did for us)?
I don't know...I think its the end of the line for Woodson and the Packers. |
This is why
| Quote: | | “@JasonLaCanfora: The Packers have announced the release of CB Charles Woodson, who was set to count about $11M against the cap.” |
_________________
2013 Adopt-a-Viking: FB Jerome Felton - |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vike daddy 

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66652
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Packers coach Mike McCarthy was asked at the Scouting Combine if his team has grown soft. He didn’t care for the suggestion.
McCarthy: “To me, we’re a physical, tough football team. I totally disagree. I don’t know how you can put the tape on and say the Green Bay Packers aren’t physical. How do we play any different from the approach, the identity today that we did in 2010? How do you swing that far? You don’t go from here to here.”
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/27/mike-mccarthy-doesnt-want-to-hear-that-the-packers-are-soft/
the 49ers certainly swung them around, that's for sure. _________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vike daddy 

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 66652
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
The Packers are reportedly torn about what to do with tight end Jermichael Finley this offseason, but Finley is a bit less conflicted. Finley told ESPN.com that he hasn’t heard anything from the Packers yet about addressing his contract, which has him set to count $8.75 million against the cap in 2013. Should they be planning to give him a call and ask about the possibility of a pay cut, they might as well save their breath.
Finley: “I’d have to walk for sure, meaning I couldn’t take a pay cut. Maybe I’d restructure if it’s a deal that I like and it makes sense, but I’m not the guy that’s just going to sign anything and let anything pass. I’m not that guy. Other than that, taking a pay cut or restructuring doesn’t sound good to me at this time. I like my deal. I start training in Minneapolis tomorrow and I’m more inspired than ever to start next season off right and be the tight end I know I can be. It’s all business at the end of the day. I just love what I do.”
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/28/jermichael-finley-says-he-wont-take-a-pay-cut/ _________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | Can we knock off all the nonsense and stick to football? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kellerman 
Joined: 16 May 2010 Posts: 3194 Location: Amsterdam
|
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why does he train in Minneapolis? _________________
sig by Jamison
#97 Everson Griffin: 0 tackles : 0 sacks : 0 FF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|