| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
AZBearsFan
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 8948
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:04 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| bearsaddict wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | I have a real simple philosophy for the OC don't care if its Tice, Bates, or anybody else. Get the ball the #22 20 times a game. Run, pass, wildcat, Idc, just put the ball in his hands. Then once defenses adjust to that, then start pushing the ball down the field w/ Brandon and Alshon. If we were just the run first team we are built to be, our offense could be well above average. |
Everything on offense that ANY OC tries is so much easier with a great Oline. We had a guy at GM that thought he could make linemen out of rejects and other teams' trash. If anyone thinks New England would do anything without their great Oline they are a fool. I care just as much about us finding actual NFL linemen at all five spots as I do an OC. A great Oline is something that even guys like Ron Turdner, John Shoop, and Terry Shea would have to try to screw up. Not that I disagree with anything you said in your post. |
Agreed. Our offense under Turner was pretty good even with Rex at QB when we had the Tait-Brown-Kreutz-Garza-Miller group all playing at the top levels of their career at the same time.
_________________
| GRRLacher wrote: | | I told you guys AZ was awesome...he in fact makes triple the pay I get for moderating here. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CadeMcGrossman
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 594
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Look,
This season and last season we've seen coaches and players stepping in and making an instant impact for their teams. So the old 'oh, let's not give Jay another system to play in, it will hurt his brain' argument is silly. Among the Bears problems is a lack of good coaching. Yes, these players are impressively loyal to Lovie, but that hasn't equaled success. 9 seasons, 3 playoff appearances, 3 playoff wins. A firing has rarely been more justified. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WindyCity
Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 6842
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Firing Tice at this point would be a band aid on a bullet wound.
The Bears offensive problem are a cultural problem with this team dating back to their creation.
The myth of defence only was born with Butkus and carried over to the 85 Bears and we are now stuck as the game has evolved and the Bears have of evolved with it.
_________________
Thanks to chisox |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bfan
Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 1234
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Madmike90 wrote: | | Bfan wrote: | | If Tice goes and Lovie stays without an extension I hope you like Bates for OC because nobody else will take the job. With a lame duck HC, no job security why should they? |
Is this the new motto around here lol…
No coach in the NFL is safe year in year out…doesn’t matter who it is this is a what have you done for me lately league…we don’t want an OC who is worried about job security in a years’ time…we want an OC who has faith in his ability to put an offence on the field that can be competent and successful enough to stick with this D so that we win games and no one has to worry about their jobs…if a coach won’t back himself then why would anyone else? Players certainly wouldn’t gravitate to him and go all out for him if he didn’t believe in himself…I’m willing to bet there are a good few QB coaches out there who are willing to back themselves with the talent we have to be the OC that has us competing around the league…let’s remember the last time we had an offence that ranked in the top half of the league we went to the SB. |
Believing in himself is one thing but putting himself in a position were someone else is going to cause him to lose his job in a year is extremely high risk. There are only a reasons to do that is one if no one else is likely to give them a chance or two they think they can get enough evidence of success on tape to get the next job or three they really believe an improvement in the offense will put the team over the top. Since it would be easy to convince yourself our D could go down hill at a moments notice the last is not likely and the shape of the Oline would make the second a crap shoot that leaves the first scenario and if no one else is going to give them the opportunity I don't want them either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Madmike90
Joined: 25 Jan 2009
Posts: 18608
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bfan wrote: | | Madmike90 wrote: | | Bfan wrote: | | If Tice goes and Lovie stays without an extension I hope you like Bates for OC because nobody else will take the job. With a lame duck HC, no job security why should they? |
Is this the new motto around here lol…
No coach in the NFL is safe year in year out…doesn’t matter who it is this is a what have you done for me lately league…we don’t want an OC who is worried about job security in a years’ time…we want an OC who has faith in his ability to put an offence on the field that can be competent and successful enough to stick with this D so that we win games and no one has to worry about their jobs…if a coach won’t back himself then why would anyone else? Players certainly wouldn’t gravitate to him and go all out for him if he didn’t believe in himself…I’m willing to bet there are a good few QB coaches out there who are willing to back themselves with the talent we have to be the OC that has us competing around the league…let’s remember the last time we had an offence that ranked in the top half of the league we went to the SB. |
Believing in himself is one thing but putting himself in a position were someone else is going to cause him to lose his job in a year is extremely high risk. There are only a reasons to do that is one if no one else is likely to give them a chance or two they think they can get enough evidence of success on tape to get the next job or three they really believe an improvement in the offense will put the team over the top. Since it would be easy to convince yourself our D could go down hill at a moments notice the last is not likely and the shape of the Oline would make the second a crap shoot that leaves the first scenario and if no one else is going to give them the opportunity I don't want them either. |
Well this is a little pointless lol. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
