| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26452
Location: #GenoSith
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:49 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| BBIB wrote: | | Colt45fool wrote: | | Someone on twitter said that Tebow to Jacksonville is all but certain this offseason. Poor Mike Mularkey |
Feel sorry for Tebow more than Mularkey. Mularkey's lack of innovation was holding the Falcons back and they have a traditional passer
Tebow with Mularkey and he doesn't have a chance to live up to his potential
That's why it's so refreshing to see how the Redskins use RGIII because you almost never see innovation in the NFL offensively to build around a dual threat QB instead of trying to force them to fit a system that was specifically designed for guys who had no mobility whatsoever or ability to stretch the field verticaly |
There's a good chance that Mularkey is canned.
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harris Smith
Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 1166
Location: Totowa, NJ
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Jane McManus, as well as others, are reporting on Twitter that Tim Tebow asked not to be used in any wildcat packages after he was passed over to start this week.
I'm not sure how I feel about that. I can see Tebow's point of view, and I agree with him he deserved an opportunity based on his NFL resume, combined with the fact that McElroy isn't exactly some phenom. However, it's disingenous to say to reporters after the game that you're going to do whatever you can to help the team win, when you made yourself unavailable to the coaching staff over the course of the week.
I think it's time to just cut him and seperate the franchise from his situation, altogether. The Jets are unlikely to recoup even a late pick for him anyways.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colt45fool
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 5036
Location: New Haven, CT
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colt45fool
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 5036
Location: New Haven, CT
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | Colt45fool wrote: | | Someone on twitter said that Tebow to Jacksonville is all but certain this offseason. Poor Mike Mularkey |
That's what we've been talking about this entire page.  |
Someone from ESPN said it was near 100% certain  I forget who.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26452
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Colt45fool wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | Colt45fool wrote: | | Someone on twitter said that Tebow to Jacksonville is all but certain this offseason. Poor Mike Mularkey |
That's what we've been talking about this entire page. |
Someone from ESPN said it was near 100% certain I forget who. |
| rickyt31 wrote: | | Quote: | @AdamSchefter
And @mortreport reports it's "a virtual certainty" that Tim Tebow will play in 2013 for the Jacksonville Jaguars. |
That would be perfect for him. |
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colt45fool
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 5036
Location: New Haven, CT
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | Colt45fool wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | Colt45fool wrote: | | Someone on twitter said that Tebow to Jacksonville is all but certain this offseason. Poor Mike Mularkey |
That's what we've been talking about this entire page. |
Someone from ESPN said it was near 100% certain I forget who. |
| rickyt31 wrote: | | Quote: | @AdamSchefter
And @mortreport reports it's "a virtual certainty" that Tim Tebow will play in 2013 for the Jacksonville Jaguars. |
That would be perfect for him. |
|
....must have missed that...or forgot it was posted 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Heavinsent
Joined: 22 Aug 2011
Posts: 582
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
The Jets screwed him. They started Mark freaking Sanchez over him, despite Sanchez showing complete incompetence for the entire season.
Why should Tebow be a part of their stupid gimmick package that never goes anywhere? They traded for him, so why not just start him at QB? It's not like there were any better options on the roster.
_________________
Props to Jamison for the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Davey
Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 20699
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| When Tim Tebow is no longer a member of the Jets, I may be able to start taking this team a little seriously again. Maybe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rickyt31
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 4723
Location: HeAtlanta,Georgia
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Davey wrote: | | When Tim Tebow is no longer a member of the Jets, I may be able to start taking this team a little seriously again. Maybe. |
They would have to make some great offseason moves for me to forget about it. The fact that we did it will bother me for a while.
_________________
Sleepers
Will Davis-Gerald Hodges -Escobar-Donald Russell-Da'rick Rogers-JJ Wilcox-D'mario Gunn- Latavius Murray-Ryan Griffin[/size] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BenchSanchez
Joined: 27 Jan 2012
Posts: 1256
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good for Tim. I would've told them long ago not to play me in that crap. If all you're going to call is a wildcat run up the middle, then shove it. You let Kerley throw it but never once let Tebow have a shot at it? GTFO. 
Happy Tim is sticking up for himself and I hope he makes things happen where ever he goes.
_________________
New York Jets • Rutgers Scarlet Knights • Brooklyn Nets |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bb33101
Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 749
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| If Tebow refused to be part of the wildcat, isn't that being insubordinate? Wouldn't the jets want to tarnish some of his shine? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BenchSanchez
Joined: 27 Jan 2012
Posts: 1256
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bb33101 wrote: | | If Tebow refused to be part of the wildcat, isn't that being insubordinate? Wouldn't the jets want to tarnish some of his shine? |
All Tebow would have to do is say what he was promised.
I doubt for one there wouldn't be anyone that wouldn't side with Tebow and two, who cares. Even as a Jets fan I've had enough of this circus.
_________________
New York Jets • Rutgers Scarlet Knights • Brooklyn Nets |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Colt45fool
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 5036
Location: New Haven, CT
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Heavinsent wrote: |
The Jets screwed him. They started Mark freaking Sanchez over him, despite Sanchez showing complete incompetence for the entire season.
Why should Tebow be a part of their stupid gimmick package that never goes anywhere? They traded for him, so why not just start him at QB? It's not like there were any better options on the roster. |
Seriously? I mean, Sanchez has been terrible, but I don't think Tebow would be any better in a conventional offense...
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BenchSanchez
Joined: 27 Jan 2012
Posts: 1256
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Colt45fool wrote: | | Heavinsent wrote: |
The Jets screwed him. They started Mark freaking Sanchez over him, despite Sanchez showing complete incompetence for the entire season.
Why should Tebow be a part of their stupid gimmick package that never goes anywhere? They traded for him, so why not just start him at QB? It's not like there were any better options on the roster. |
Seriously? I mean, Sanchez has been terrible, but I don't think Tebow would be any better in a conventional offense... |
No, but he we implemented the spread offense we'd have a chance..
_________________
New York Jets • Rutgers Scarlet Knights • Brooklyn Nets |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
