| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who wins? |
| Titans |
|
83% |
[ 10 ] |
| Jets |
|
16% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 12 |
|
| Author |
Message |
TitanLegend
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 1508
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:03 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Mesa_Titan wrote: | | titansNvolsR#1 wrote: | | Also, I was pretty drunk at that point, but did I see a triple option play called on 3rd and short and Locker pitch it back 10 yards? Yeah.... let's not do that anymore. |
Yup. I about put my fist through my TV.
I can't stand the dumbassery we have for coaches. |
The play was fine. Had Locker kept the ball, it was a first down.
Blaming a perfectly fine play call when execution is the problem is probably our season in a nutshell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ttitansfan4life
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 18652
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TitanLegend wrote: | | Mesa_Titan wrote: | | titansNvolsR#1 wrote: | | Also, I was pretty drunk at that point, but did I see a triple option play called on 3rd and short and Locker pitch it back 10 yards? Yeah.... let's not do that anymore. |
Yup. I about put my fist through my TV.
I can't stand the dumbassery we have for coaches. |
The play was fine. Had Locker kept the ball, it was a first down.
Blaming a perfectly fine play call when execution is the problem is probably our season in a nutshell. |
It was a dumb play call. It was 3rd and 1. No need to do anything dumb like that. Run the ball with Quinn with a FB dive or run the ball up the middle with CJ.
_________________
Props to "Joe is the Best" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TitanLegend
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 1508
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ttitansfan4life wrote: | | TitanLegend wrote: | | Mesa_Titan wrote: | | titansNvolsR#1 wrote: | | Also, I was pretty drunk at that point, but did I see a triple option play called on 3rd and short and Locker pitch it back 10 yards? Yeah.... let's not do that anymore. |
Yup. I about put my fist through my TV.
I can't stand the dumbassery we have for coaches. |
The play was fine. Had Locker kept the ball, it was a first down.
Blaming a perfectly fine play call when execution is the problem is probably our season in a nutshell. |
It was a dumb play call. It was 3rd and 1. No need to do anything dumb like that. Run the ball with Quinn with a FB dive or run the ball up the middle with CJ. |
It was a play call that would have got a first down if executed properly. Nothing dumb about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
titans0021
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 21689
Location: Props to big_palooka on the sig
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?
More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.
_________________
Adopted Titans - Chris Johnson and Fernando Velasco. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TitanLegend
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 1508
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| titans0021 wrote: | Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?
More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back. |
I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
titansNvolsR#1
Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Posts: 10753
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TitanLegend wrote: | | titans0021 wrote: | Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?
More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back. |
I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes? |
Wyatt said they are moving Velasco back to C and putting DeVan at G. Our coaches are complete imbeciles.
_________________
| White wrote: | | You give up the world line by line. You've become an accomplice in your own annihilation and there is nothing you can do about it. Everything you do closes a door somewhere ahead of you. And finally there is only one door left. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TitanLegend
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 1508
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| titansNvolsR#1 wrote: | | TitanLegend wrote: | | titans0021 wrote: | Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?
More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back. |
I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes? |
Wyatt said they are moving Velasco back to C and putting DeVan at G. Our coaches are complete imbeciles. |
Yeah doesn't make any sense then. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flylow
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 146
Location: Nashville, TN
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| titans0021 wrote: | Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?
More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back. |
The reason why Velasco was at G and Matthews at C is due to the fact Matthews best position is C. As to why Velasco didn't slide over to C when Matthews went down, I have no idea and honestly I don't think our coaching staff does either.
Does anyone know how serious Matthews injury was?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lamont
Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 3187
Location: tennessee
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Flylow wrote: | | titans0021 wrote: | Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?
More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back. |
The reason why Velasco was at G and Matthews at C is due to the fact Matthews best position is C. As to why Velasco didn't slide over to C when Matthews went down, I have no idea and honestly I don't think our coaching staff does either.
Does anyone know how serious Matthews injury was? |
Sprained ankle. He got rolled up on in the pile.
_________________
**The #1 reason the Titans are my favorite team is #9. -- R.I.P Steve "Air" McNair**
Shout out to NS922 on da sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
s_camp
Joined: 10 Dec 2010
Posts: 2225
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TitanLegend wrote: | | titans0021 wrote: | Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?
More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back. |
I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes? |
No way, did you see him trying to block in space last night? If he's the best we've got then we need to take those plays completely out of the book. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Titans fan 617
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 9283
Location: BeanTown
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| s_camp wrote: | | TitanLegend wrote: | | titans0021 wrote: | Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?
More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back. |
I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes? |
No way, did you see him trying to block in space last night? If he's the best we've got then we need to take those plays completely out of the book. |
After last night my vote is for Roos as our best blocker in space
_________________
Sig/Av By Kiltman
TITANIA FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS
*2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mesa_Titan
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 48840
Location: Kiltman on the sig!!!
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Titans fan 617 wrote: | | s_camp wrote: | | TitanLegend wrote: | | titans0021 wrote: | Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?
More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back. |
I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes? |
No way, did you see him trying to block in space last night? If he's the best we've got then we need to take those plays completely out of the book. |
After last night my vote is for Roos as our best blocker anywhere |
fify
_________________
| FootballPhreak wrote: | | Stanton is garbage |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TitanLegend
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 1508
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Our offensive line was doing really well/gelling together as the year went on. Roos bounced back from a rough start. Stewart continued his success. Hutchinson was great. Velasco played very well at center. Harris was average, but not a weakpoint.
Then everything just imploded thanks to injuries. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MdTitansFan56
Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Posts: 621
Location: Maryland
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I felt as though Lutui was an upgrade over Harris at RG. Not sure on Velasco as I didn't get to watch all of our games but if CJ's production was any indicator then yes our Oline began to gel and got better with age. Then again not sure if it was that or the sub par competition
_________________
1. Alex Morgan 2.San Antonio Spurs 3. Chicago White Sox 4. Ohio State 5. Buckeyes 6. Philadelphia Flyers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TitanSS
Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 2034
Location: My house
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
14 Total penalties. A large sum of those were momemtum and drive stoppers, a few of them extending the drive for the Jets on third down.
5 forced turnovers and ZERO points off turnovers. Nearly every one of the interceptions put us at the 50 or inside and we didn't even come away with a field goal. Partially do to nasty penalties described above.
10 punts.. ...... .......
The team looks like they are on their own out there and even though they got the win, they looked embarassing on national TV during Monday Night Football.
It's looking like Munchak may not be back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
