Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Crash's 2013 Raider Mock Offseason. Version 2 Up- 12/8/12
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10894
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Totty wrote:
I don't mind this, I just wanted to say that Larry Grant would start over AO. Grant is a legit LB and when he bolts from SF next year, I see him making a outright impact on his next team!


And he is a Bay Area kid so there may be a chance.
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
attack_in_s/b


Joined: 11 Aug 2010
Posts: 502
PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZoomWaffle wrote:
Baggabonez wrote:
I don't like drafts that make me count. LOL.

Couple questions:
Why would the Jets be so motivated to move up to the #5 pick overall to give the Raiders their 1st, 2nd and 3rd?

Shouldn't it be #10, #42 & #74?

Doesn't Louis play RG?


We trade back and give them McFadden, and all that gets us is the 42nd and 74th? Trading out of a top-5 spot alone would get us a 2nd and a 3rd (ATL gave up 2 1sts, a 2nd, and 2 4ths to move from 10 to 6 to take Julio Jones)

If we trade down and trade McFadden, it'll be to two different teams and we will get at least a 2nd or multiple mid-round picks for McFadden.


My thinking exactly... since when does a team get your best player for trading up in the 1st round? We move down 5 slots and lose Mcfadden for a 2nd and 3rd.... sounds like a raider move...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
attack_in_s/b


Joined: 11 Aug 2010
Posts: 502
PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As well, this leaves us with a huge hole at rb... our defense might get fractionally better but our offense will get exponentially worse... regardless of how poorly mcfadden was doing prior to the injury i dont think you can argue our offense is better with him in... at the very least hes someone the defense has to account for, which creates opportunities for our WR`s to step up.

My draft trade:

Trade back further, keep mcfadden... accumulate more draft picks.
Trade #5 Pick for #15-20 + 2013 first rounder +2012 2nd. Moving back that far i dont think this is unrealistic. Sure, theres no RG3 in this draft. But there is always a team that falls in love with a top 10 prospect but isn't picking till later. See RG3 trade, Morris Claiborn, Julio Jones,etc...

Consensus is our 1st round pick is probably gonna be used on a pass rusher... there's always great ones that go in the middle of the 1st... don't need to be picking top 10 to find a good pass rusher and imo Montgomery isn't even the best available at that point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
backinblack


Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 148
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 12:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Crash's 2013 Raider Mock Offseason Reply with quote

[quote="CrashMan510"]Crashes 2013 Raider Mock Offseason

Raiders Finished The 2012 Season With A 5-11 Record, Good Enough For The #5 Pick.

2013 FAís
Bold= Let Go. Not Bold = Resign

Philip Adams(RFA)
Khalif Barnes(UFA)
Ron Bartell(UFA)
Desmond Bryant(UFA)
Duke Calhoun(ERFA)
Cooper Carlisle(UFA)
Andre Carter(UFA)
Coye Francies(RFA)
Omar Gaither(UFA)
Matt Giordano(UFA)
Mike Goodson(UFA)
Derek Hagan(UFA)
Joselio Hanson(UFA)
Zach Hurd(ERFA)
Shane Lechler(UFA)
Matt Leinart(UFA)
Mike Mitchell(UFA)
Brandon Myers(UFA)
Alex Parsons(RFA)
Brandian Ross(ERFA)
Owen Schmitt(UFA)
Matt Shaughnessy(UFA)
Willie Smith(UFA)
Shawntae Spencer(UFA)
Philip Wheeler(UFA)

Cuts

Tommy Kelly- Cut
Rolando McClain- Cut
Dave Tollefson- Cut

Traded

(Raiders) Darren McFadden + #5 Pick -> (Jets) #10 Pick + 2012 #42 Pick + 2012 #72 pickList Of Total Draft Picks -> (1)#10, (2)#42, (3) #67, (3) #72, (4) #99 , (6) #163
Free Agent Pick Upís

we are already viewed as a joke of a franchise and would make it even worse if we traded DMC for 2 2012,WHICH IS LAST YEARS DRAFT picks! sorry had to do it[/b]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nodisrespect


Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 3909
Location: in the present
PostPosted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice draft, i think trading back is big possibility, given how much McKenzie values draft picks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CrashMan510


Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 4582
Location: Bay Area
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Version 2 is up
_________________


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eSN8Cwit_s
fuarge
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tacos


Joined: 13 Jan 2011
Posts: 1171
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I actually like it a lot.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raiiiiidersssss


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 5209
Location: The Black Hole
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

why are we cutting Seebass? I like it overall, just a few minor quips. Also, I would prefer Star.

But I think trading McFadden and DHB is great.
_________________
MACKiavelli
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Baggabonez


Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 5926
Location: RaiderNation
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stanton would beat out Pryor in an open competition. Why would Baker come to Oakland when could sign elsewhere for LT $? What has Bergstrom proven at LG and Ausberry at TE to anoint them starters absent competition? That offense is a recipe for disaster, imo.
_________________
Nodisrespect on building inside out wrote:
teams without highly draft DT's make the playoffs and win the superbowl regularly.

Bonez wrote:
Teams that win Superbowls and make the playoffs aren't picking in the Top 5, clearly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big_palooka


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 22603
Location: ATL
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So unrealisticly bad. It's 95% pipe dreams.

2nd for Palmer. Not happening.

New England giving a 5th for a WR who can't catch and has a large salary. No.

This isn't madden man
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group