| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dr. Philly
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 34141
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:05 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
StarCox will be amazing
_________________
| simonwayne wrote: | | LeBron has done for the NBA what Teen Mom has done for teenage pregnancies |
#JDI |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
killdawabbit
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 5583
Location: Somewhere you're not.
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| EaglesFan5-36-81 wrote: |
Have you seen Jake Scott play these past few games? He's been a very good guard and your kidding yourself if you think otherwise. Its no coincidence that our OL has played much better since his insertion in the starting lineup. Either way with Peters, Kelce, and Herremans coming back, Kelly looking good at RT, and Scott potentially being re-signed, tackle is not a need in round one. I'd much rather have an offensive line of Jason Peters - Evan Mathis - Jason Kelce - Jake Scott - Todd Herremans and a top 5 pick and draft a guy like Reid Fragel to develop in the 4th than an offensive line of Jason Peters - Evan Mathis - Jason Kelce - Todd Herremans - Luke Joeckel and no more top 5 pick because we took an offensive lineman when we have much bigger needs.
QB is a position of need, and since you bring up the Patriots in your example, realize that they weren't worth a damn as a franchise until they found Brady, but 9 times out of 10 if you don't take your QB in the first they tend to flop. Matt Light meanwhile was a mid 2nd rounder. Vince Wilfork was mid 1st rounder. Neither were top 5 picks.
In addition to a QB, we need a completely new secondary, some pass rushers, a defensive tackle, a SAM linebacker, wide receiver, and potentially a tight end before we need an offensive line starter. We have a good OL when healthy, and its stupid. Over the past 10 years name a team that drafted an OL in the top 5 without having a franchise QB that has done a damned thing. |
I just love how much you like Reid Fragel. 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
killdawabbit
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 5583
Location: Somewhere you're not.
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
One thing I am starting to worry about though, is that the Eagles will end up with that top 5 pick, get and offensive minded coach and draft Barkley as their "franchise" QB (being as Geno will very likely be a Chief). I could see this happening. It wouldn't be my favorite move, of course I'd have to then hope he would succeed...
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RainbowCarebear
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 33219
Location: Kiltman on the amazing signature!
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
The current Chiefs scouts and/or gm is suppose to like Wilson more than Smith, but regardless. Let's hope can continue to play like he did against Dallas.
_________________
Eagles War Room |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
killdawabbit
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 5583
Location: Somewhere you're not.
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | The current Chiefs scouts and/or gm is suppose to like Wilson more than Smith, but regardless. Let's hope can continue to play like he did against Dallas. |
Interesting. Where did you hear this or, even better, do you know of a link?
Indeed, as things currently look, it would be better for the Eagles if Foles continued to improve into looking like a viable NFL starter.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RainbowCarebear
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 33219
Location: Kiltman on the amazing signature!
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| killdawabbit wrote: | | RainbowCarebear wrote: | | The current Chiefs scouts and/or gm is suppose to like Wilson more than Smith, but regardless. Let's hope can continue to play like he did against Dallas. |
Interesting. Where did you hear this or, even better, do you know of a link?
Indeed, as things currently look, it would be better for the Eagles if Foles continued to improve into looking like a viable NFL starter. |
No link, but I think Reality_Check got some insider in the Chiefs organization
_________________
Eagles War Room |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
baconrad3
Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 7172
Location: Tempe, AZ
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | killdawabbit wrote: | | RainbowCarebear wrote: | | The current Chiefs scouts and/or gm is suppose to like Wilson more than Smith, but regardless. Let's hope can continue to play like he did against Dallas. |
Interesting. Where did you hear this or, even better, do you know of a link?
Indeed, as things currently look, it would be better for the Eagles if Foles continued to improve into looking like a viable NFL starter. |
No link, but I think Reality_Check got some insider in the Chiefs organization |
If that's true...... 
If Chiefs somehow passed on Geno and he fell in our lap...my god. That organization would be an even bigger joke than it is now......
_________________
#OfficialBlakeBortlesHypeTrain |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NoHypeNeeded
Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 10471
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
No way do the Chiefs pass on Geno (or Bark really) but if they did I'd love for us to get Geno.
_________________
| Jroc04 wrote: | | This is the Eagles forum; we woke up drinking. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WhackyPlague
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 4827
Location: South Carolina
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| killdawabbit wrote: | | One thing I am starting to worry about though, is that the Eagles will end up with that top 5 pick, get and offensive minded coach and draft Barkley as their "franchise" QB (being as Geno will very likely be a Chief). I could see this happening. It wouldn't be my favorite move, of course I'd have to then hope he would succeed... |
I don't think Barkley will end up being the #2 QB, I could easily see that going to Tyler Wilson. That said, I would have a really hard time passing up on Star Lotululei if he's there when we pick. He's the closest thing this draft has to a sure-fire Pro Bowl player. Just imagine him and Cox playing next to each other for the next five years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaclinandMCcoy
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Posts: 3289
Location: Columbia, SC GO COCKS!
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | killdawabbit wrote: | | RainbowCarebear wrote: | | The current Chiefs scouts and/or gm is suppose to like Wilson more than Smith, but regardless. Let's hope can continue to play like he did against Dallas. |
Interesting. Where did you hear this or, even better, do you know of a link?
Indeed, as things currently look, it would be better for the Eagles if Foles continued to improve into looking like a viable NFL starter. |
No link, but I think Reality_Check got some insider in the Chiefs organization |
https://twitter.com/NFLDraftMonster/status/273122269738455041
There's the link also that is Reality_check
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | btw why do you guys like cats if you're eagles. i thought birds and cats were natural enemies. maybe im too wasted but it doesnt make sense. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 48105
Location: #championchip #2012BirdsHoF #2012GoldStnd #YAKtoseIntolerant #Merica #TrollyRangers #Danes #BirdGang
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hopefully Brady Quinn plays like he did last week for the rest of the year 
_________________
| theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Only for the quick and lucky. |
Danish proverb 3:69 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BBIB
Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 8771
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The Jaguars are the one key team that needs to get another win because Eagles will have tie breaker over them so they don't steal Luke Joeckel
But problem is the Jets is the last winnable game on paper for the Jaguars.
So if they don't win on Sunday they may have wrapped up a top 2 pick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BBIB
Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 8771
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| marky_b27 wrote: | There are two reasons why we should consider taking offensive linemen early:
1. 3 of our players did have season ending injuries, 2 of whom are over 30. In the past we've been burnt by relying on players coming back from injuries, we need to ensure we have contingency plans.
2. We have a habit of overrating our players (remember when Jamar Chaney was the new Jon Beason). Kelly has had a couple of solid games but let's not crown him the next Jon Runyan yet. The same thing with Scott. His arrival may have suddenly upgraded the line, but I think it's more to do with the fact that we have consistency upfront. |
THIS THIS THIS
Jake Scott has surprisingly looked decent on a horrid Oline. Yet he's done enough to justify passing on an ELITE OT prospect? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky_b27
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 20313
Location: Nottingham, England
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BBIB wrote: | | marky_b27 wrote: | There are two reasons why we should consider taking offensive linemen early:
1. 3 of our players did have season ending injuries, 2 of whom are over 30. In the past we've been burnt by relying on players coming back from injuries, we need to ensure we have contingency plans.
2. We have a habit of overrating our players (remember when Jamar Chaney was the new Jon Beason). Kelly has had a couple of solid games but let's not crown him the next Jon Runyan yet. The same thing with Scott. His arrival may have suddenly upgraded the line, but I think it's more to do with the fact that we have consistency upfront. |
THIS THIS THIS
Jake Scott has surprisingly looked decent on a horrid Oline. Yet he's done enough to justify passing on an ELITE OT prospect? |
Taking an offensive lineman early doesn't mean taking one at #3 overall - that would not be good value.
_________________
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Marky > Foles |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gator3guy
Joined: 24 Mar 2012
Posts: 745
Location: 856
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MaclinandMCcoy wrote: | | RainbowCarebear wrote: | | killdawabbit wrote: | | RainbowCarebear wrote: | | The current Chiefs scouts and/or gm is suppose to like Wilson more than Smith, but regardless. Let's hope can continue to play like he did against Dallas. |
Interesting. Where did you hear this or, even better, do you know of a link?
Indeed, as things currently look, it would be better for the Eagles if Foles continued to improve into looking like a viable NFL starter. |
No link, but I think Reality_Check got some insider in the Chiefs organization |
https://twitter.com/NFLDraftMonster/status/273122269738455041
There's the link also that is Reality_check |
People really believe this? Who's to say they even think Geno's a first rounder? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
