| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
KBS756
Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 3148
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| xenajets wrote: | | Rich51 wrote: | | Say it ain't so. I just heard on MSNBC that McElroy is inactivated for this week and Rex is comfortable with his decision. |
Wow im actually shocked if this is true. I was okay with Sanchez starting this week on the basis that if he was anything other than great then he would be benched. This is a complete joke! |
Sanchez has more pressure then ... if McElroy is not active it means Tebow is active. Which in turn means if Rex Hands Tebow a game due to poor play from Sanchez, Tebow's gonna stay in as long as he does well because the fans and media will be pushing for him like crazy.
I think Sanchez gets pulled if he has another ineffective passing performance with a stupid turn over or 2
then we have to deal with Tebow Time |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jetsman82 
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 18344
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rich51 wrote: | | Say it ain't so. I just heard on MSNBC that McElroy is inactivated for this week and Rex is comfortable with his decision. |
There's your problem.
Until a reputable news source reports it, I'm not buying it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colt45fool 
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Posts: 5036 Location: New Haven, CT
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rich51 wrote: | | Say it ain't so. I just heard on MSNBC that McElroy is inactivated for this week and Rex is comfortable with his decision. | If this is true, I'm on the fire Rex train for the foreseeable future. That would be unacceptable. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FootballProdiG 
Joined: 16 Sep 2012 Posts: 3747
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Colt45fool wrote: | | Rich51 wrote: | | Say it ain't so. I just heard on MSNBC that McElroy is inactivated for this week and Rex is comfortable with his decision. | If this is true, I'm on the fire Rex train for the foreseeable future. That would be unacceptable. |
I've been on the fire Rex train long before this. You can't win with Rex Ryan. As fans we can only "lose better". He has a loser mentality, that will never win this team a superbowl. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jetsman82 
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 18344
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The one thing Rex doesn't have is a loser's mentality. That's a pretty absurd thing to say really. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FootballProdiG 
Joined: 16 Sep 2012 Posts: 3747
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jetsman82 wrote: | | The one thing Rex doesn't have is a loser's mentality. That's a pretty absurd thing to say really. |
Please explain? So that's why he's starting Sanchez again after Sanchez just nearly mentally exploded after the last game right? And it must be why no one else has gotten a chance to play the QB position in prior weeks despite Mark Sanchez being terrible right?...Obvious winner mentality right there from Rex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jetsman82 
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 18344
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FootballProdiG wrote: | | Jetsman82 wrote: | | The one thing Rex doesn't have is a loser's mentality. That's a pretty absurd thing to say really. |
Please explain? So that's why he's starting Sanchez again after Sanchez just nearly mentally exploded after the last game right? And it must be why no one else has gotten a chance to play the QB position in prior weeks despite Mark Sanchez being terrible right?...Obvious winner mentality right there from Rex. |
Just because he's probably wrong doesn't mean he has a loser's mentality.
He's doing this because he thinks, at the moment, Mark Sanchez gives his football team the best chance to win. We can disagree with that all we want, and we'll see who's right in the end, but for you to say Rex Ryan has a loser's mentality to me says you either don't know what a loser's mentality is, or you haven't paid attention to Rex Ryan very much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FootballProdiG 
Joined: 16 Sep 2012 Posts: 3747
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jetsman82 wrote: | | FootballProdiG wrote: | | Jetsman82 wrote: | | The one thing Rex doesn't have is a loser's mentality. That's a pretty absurd thing to say really. |
Please explain? So that's why he's starting Sanchez again after Sanchez just nearly mentally exploded after the last game right? And it must be why no one else has gotten a chance to play the QB position in prior weeks despite Mark Sanchez being terrible right?...Obvious winner mentality right there from Rex. |
Just because he's probably wrong doesn't mean he has a loser's mentality.
He's doing this because he thinks, at the moment, Mark Sanchez gives his football team the best chance to win. We can disagree with that all we want, and we'll see who's right in the end, but for you to say Rex Ryan has a loser's mentality to me says you either don't know what a loser's mentality is, or you haven't paid attention to Rex Ryan very much. |
That's just it though, Sanchez doesn't give us the best chance to win. That's why he was benched by Rex last week. And now he's giving him a second chance to "not win" again. I think Rex is a good coach, but his obsession with Sanchez is making this team bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
richie jets
Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Posts: 688 Location: yonkers
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Well with Sanchez starting it gives us a better chance to better our draft position in April . Rex sticks with his guys it's more noticeable because the qb position , but when you think about the awful play going back last year. Jim Leonard , Eric smith, Wayne hunter , there's a bunch of guys that Rex became "friends " when they played well . And he has trouble being a boss by benching them and releasing them in the offseason. Ok hopefully they learn at get canned. we as fans actually have a say " don't go to the games" if Sanchez does anything less than 2-0 105 passer rating and avg 325 yards a game the next two . the last home game should be empty if Sanchez starts , I'm hoping for a black out Vs san diego |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Colt45fool 
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Posts: 5036 Location: New Haven, CT
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jetsman82 wrote: | | FootballProdiG wrote: | | Jetsman82 wrote: | | The one thing Rex doesn't have is a loser's mentality. That's a pretty absurd thing to say really. |
Please explain? So that's why he's starting Sanchez again after Sanchez just nearly mentally exploded after the last game right? And it must be why no one else has gotten a chance to play the QB position in prior weeks despite Mark Sanchez being terrible right?...Obvious winner mentality right there from Rex. |
Just because he's probably wrong doesn't mean he has a loser's mentality.
He's doing this because he thinks, at the moment, Mark Sanchez gives his football team the best chance to win. We can disagree with that all we want, and we'll see who's right in the end, but for you to say Rex Ryan has a loser's mentality to me says you either don't know what a loser's mentality is, or you haven't paid attention to Rex Ryan very much. |
Sanchez is our best QB, fact. Does he give us the best chance to win...I'm not so sure. Turnovers can be the reason for any loss and I think Sanchez will prove (once again) how turnover prone he is. Turnovers =/= winning football _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
teamorange 
Joined: 15 Nov 2010 Posts: 6978
|
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Who cares? McElroy doesn't look good and doesn't look like the future. Its a wash year anyway, I don't really care who they start at QB.
Tebow might be best b/c maybe he drives up his trade value with a few wins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justo 
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 9056 Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jetsman82 wrote: | | Rich51 wrote: | | Say it ain't so. I just heard on MSNBC that McElroy is inactivated for this week and Rex is comfortable with his decision. |
There's your problem.
Until a reputable news source reports it, I'm not buying it. | Honestly how many reputable news sources are there truly anymore? _________________
 | HyponGrey wrote: | | Facing the reality that your team has higher standards than you do? Priceless. | @JustoFS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justo 
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 9056 Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| KBS756 wrote: | | Sanchez has more pressure then ... if McElroy is not active it means Tebow is active. Which in turn means if Rex Hands Tebow a game due to poor play from Sanchez, Tebow's gonna stay in as long as he does well because the fans and media will be pushing for him like crazy. |
Cut and print. Okay. Next scene you guys win out and beat out Pittsburgh and Cincinnati in the playoff tie breaker. On the road vs the Broncos. This should be fun. _________________
 | HyponGrey wrote: | | Facing the reality that your team has higher standards than you do? Priceless. | @JustoFS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GangGreen420 
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 2286 Location: FL
|
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| teamorange wrote: | Who cares? McElroy doesn't look good and doesn't look like the future. Its a wash year anyway, I don't really care who they start at QB.
Tebow might be best b/c maybe he drives up his trade value with a few wins. |
I'm afraid that will only drive up his "Woody Johnson value" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jetsman82 
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 18344
|
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | Jetsman82 wrote: | | Rich51 wrote: | | Say it ain't so. I just heard on MSNBC that McElroy is inactivated for this week and Rex is comfortable with his decision. |
There's your problem.
Until a reputable news source reports it, I'm not buying it. | Honestly how many reputable news sources are there truly anymore? |
Not many, really. I tend to not believe anything until I hear it from the person of interest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|