| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who was the Player of the Week for week 12? |
| Janoris Jenkins: Being Lindley's Favorite Target |
|
84% |
[ 22 ] |
| Craig Dahl: Doing something useful |
|
15% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 26 |
|
| Author |
Message |
StLunatic88
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 7227
Location: How good is your Good?
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:15 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| S-jax39 wrote: | | StLunatic88 wrote: | | S-jax39 wrote: | | StLunatic88 wrote: | | S-jax39 wrote: | | Um, since hes been back what game has saffold not had a false start in? |
Um both the first San Fran and Arizona games. He has been back for 4 games and has 2 false starts. |
Im pretty sure i remember him having a false start against arizona.
Nope- got him confused with wells i believe. Still, the holds are killing us and they are extremely frustrating. That hold on the Sjax run almost cost us the game in OT. |
Which was Mulligan... |
I didnt say who it was ( I didnt remember) I was just pointing out how the holds are killing us. |
No argument there, on offense & Special Teams |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31526
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| StLunatic88 wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | I agree with that. Unless they don't plan on featuring a TE in the passing game, we need a receiving TE. Lance is a good athlete who can separate but he's not reliable when it comes to catching the ball.
I'd love to see us draft receiving type TE in the 4th round. In fact, that's what I did in my latest mock which I'll post some time tonight. |
Is there that big of a difference between Lance Kendricks & Dustin Keller? Keller is more athletic overall, with a bit more speed. He is a better receiving weapon, but not by that much in my mind.
Keller was a major part of the offense there due to no other weapons, Schotty doesnt base his Offense around the TE. I would personally love to try and find a Grahm/Gronk/Rudolph type, but Im not sure thats the offense we seem to be running. |
Keller isn't all that good in the first place but he has better hands than Lance while Lance puts him to shame as a blocker.
I'd just settle for a Witten or Zach Miller lol. Two guys I like right now are Ryan Otten and Gavin Escobar.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D9-EM
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 441
Location: St. Louis, MO
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anyone think the Rams and 49ers will get a Monday night game next year? I hope so after those two exciting games. I saw about 100 Rams jerseys today while I was out. We're walking tall today.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yrba1
Joined: 25 Jan 2011
Posts: 1061
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| D9-EM wrote: | | Anyone think the Rams and 49ers will get a Monday night game next year? I hope so after those two exciting games. I saw about 100 Rams jerseys today while I was out. We're walking tall today. |
Don't be surprised if they're on Sunday Night Football. These two teams play like the Steelers and Ravens facing each other. I'd say MNF goes to Rams-Titans (Jeff Fisher faces his old team) or Rams-Saints (Spags faces the team he once coached).
_________________
♫ R.I.P. Nujabes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sherm
Joined: 09 Oct 2009
Posts: 1289
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Nice win. I called u guys being our toughest test in the div before the season(on another mb). Even though Sea might make the playoffs u guys prob will go undefeated.
PS.
Old school uni's >>> new
Rather play u guys than lame [inappropriate/removed] Cards every yr on Monday nite.
Jenkins is the new A. Samuel. Good or bad depending on your thinking. 
_________________
I love me some 49ers, Michigan, and my Lakers.
2009- Brandon Graham, DE, Michigan - 64 Tck 26 TFL 10.5 sacks
2010- Sam Acho, DE, Texas - 59 tck, 17 TFL, 9 sacks, 5 FF, 5 FR |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
El ramster
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 24546
Location: Sam Bradfords Bed!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The J.R.S.
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 2776
Location: Next to Waldo
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| StLunatic88 wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | I agree with that. Unless they don't plan on featuring a TE in the passing game, we need a receiving TE. Lance is a good athlete who can separate but he's not reliable when it comes to catching the ball.
I'd love to see us draft receiving type TE in the 4th round. In fact, that's what I did in my latest mock which I'll post some time tonight. |
Is there that big of a difference between Lance Kendricks & Dustin Keller? Keller is more athletic overall, with a bit more speed. He is a better receiving weapon, but not by that much in my mind.
Keller was a major part of the offense there due to no other weapons, Schotty doesnt base his Offense around the TE. I would personally love to try and find a Grahm/Gronk/Rudolph type, but Im not sure thats the offense we seem to be running. |
Offensive Coordinators design game-plans around their players, not the other way around. If we added a pass catching threat to this team now, he'd probably see 15 targets a game because of the lack of options.
_________________
Real sports fans do not condone ESPN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
El ramster
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 24546
Location: Sam Bradfords Bed!
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The J.R.S. wrote: | | StLunatic88 wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | I agree with that. Unless they don't plan on featuring a TE in the passing game, we need a receiving TE. Lance is a good athlete who can separate but he's not reliable when it comes to catching the ball.
I'd love to see us draft receiving type TE in the 4th round. In fact, that's what I did in my latest mock which I'll post some time tonight. |
Is there that big of a difference between Lance Kendricks & Dustin Keller? Keller is more athletic overall, with a bit more speed. He is a better receiving weapon, but not by that much in my mind.
Keller was a major part of the offense there due to no other weapons, Schotty doesnt base his Offense around the TE. I would personally love to try and find a Grahm/Gronk/Rudolph type, but Im not sure thats the offense we seem to be running. |
Offensive Coordinators design game-plans around their players, not the other way around. If we added a pass catching threat to this team now, he'd probably see 15 targets a game because of the lack of options. |
Thats crazy talk.. Try 4-6, I don't even think Number 1 WR's get targeted that much.
_________________
| Dus10 wrote: | | Note to self: Do not lose a sig bet to Rammy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The J.R.S.
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 2776
Location: Next to Waldo
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| El ramster wrote: | | The J.R.S. wrote: | | StLunatic88 wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | I agree with that. Unless they don't plan on featuring a TE in the passing game, we need a receiving TE. Lance is a good athlete who can separate but he's not reliable when it comes to catching the ball.
I'd love to see us draft receiving type TE in the 4th round. In fact, that's what I did in my latest mock which I'll post some time tonight. |
Is there that big of a difference between Lance Kendricks & Dustin Keller? Keller is more athletic overall, with a bit more speed. He is a better receiving weapon, but not by that much in my mind.
Keller was a major part of the offense there due to no other weapons, Schotty doesnt base his Offense around the TE. I would personally love to try and find a Grahm/Gronk/Rudolph type, but Im not sure thats the offense we seem to be running. |
Offensive Coordinators design game-plans around their players, not the other way around. If we added a pass catching threat to this team now, he'd probably see 15 targets a game because of the lack of options. |
Thats crazy talk.. Try 4-6, I don't even think Number 1 WR's get targeted that much. |
Embellishment my friend, that wasn't a serious estimate. More like a dramatic illustration of my point.
That being said, look at Given's target total this last week and some of Amendola's as well. Gibson, Kendricks, Steve Smith, and Quick have been so worthless that we are forced to target our "number 1" WR.
_________________
Real sports fans do not condone ESPN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
S-jax39
Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 5660
Location: [D]MV
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The J.R.S. wrote: | | El ramster wrote: | | The J.R.S. wrote: | | StLunatic88 wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | I agree with that. Unless they don't plan on featuring a TE in the passing game, we need a receiving TE. Lance is a good athlete who can separate but he's not reliable when it comes to catching the ball.
I'd love to see us draft receiving type TE in the 4th round. In fact, that's what I did in my latest mock which I'll post some time tonight. |
Is there that big of a difference between Lance Kendricks & Dustin Keller? Keller is more athletic overall, with a bit more speed. He is a better receiving weapon, but not by that much in my mind.
Keller was a major part of the offense there due to no other weapons, Schotty doesnt base his Offense around the TE. I would personally love to try and find a Grahm/Gronk/Rudolph type, but Im not sure thats the offense we seem to be running. |
Offensive Coordinators design game-plans around their players, not the other way around. If we added a pass catching threat to this team now, he'd probably see 15 targets a game because of the lack of options. |
Thats crazy talk.. Try 4-6, I don't even think Number 1 WR's get targeted that much. |
Embellishment my friend, that wasn't a serious estimate. More like a dramatic illustration of my point.
That being said, look at Given's target total this last week and some of Amendola's as well. Gibson, Kendricks, Steve Smith, and Quick have been so worthless that we are forced to target our "number 1" WR. |
I'd love to get Jared Cook. He'd be cheap and he can make plays.
_________________
| SwiftTexan wrote: | | Chris Long has not been a difference maker on defense.......Chris Long is an above average starter and nothing more. |
#Yeezus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
STLRamsFan99
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Posts: 866
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jjab360
Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 3366
Location: On Top
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yeah... Brockers had nowhere near 11 tackles on Sunday. Still had a great day, though, big things ahead for him in the future.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonezy
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 2993
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Gerald Hayes ball so hard
_________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NVRamsFan
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Posts: 982
Location: Reno, NV
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| El ramster wrote: | http://prod.images.rams.clubs.nflcdn.com/image-web/NFL/CDA/data/deployed/prod/RAMS/assets/images/imported/STL/photos/clubimages/2012/12-December/tempRams_49ers_12022_022--nfl_mezz_1280_1024.jpg?width=800
Looks like Hekker is doing a line or 2 |
That right there is an amazing pic! any chance of working that into a sig?
_________________
Sig courtesy of SJax39
Adopt a Ram!
Chris Givens
81 targets 42 rec 698 yds 3 TD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MISTA314
Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 608
Location: Physically KC but my hearts always in the LOU!!!
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I also was in attendence this past weekend. I currently live in kansas city so this was the first game I've been to in almost 10 years and i have to say i could not have picked a better game to make my comeback. I was in section 145 so we were right on the field on the visitors side. Me and my boys pride ourselves on being skilled hecklers . That game had so many emotional peeks and valleys that i almost couldn't take it. The best part of the game was when Greg kicked the game winning FG and to look at the sea of red that we were surrounded by tuck their tails between their legs . After the game my buddies and I decided to make the 49er game (home and away) an annual tradition from here on out!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
