| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
as11osu
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 16098
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:38 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Goodell... worst ever.
Just quit already.
_________________
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelerspower
Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 7742
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I am glad that I was not the only one to think that the suspension of Reed was stupid
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
coordinator0
Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 8008
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| tylerdouglass wrote: | | StRawz11 wrote: | | It was pretty clear Ed turned his head before contact. Still helmet to helmet, but he didn't hit hit with the crown |
Irrelevant.  |
In terms of whether or not a flag should be thrown, sure, but it looks like it's relevant when you're talking about suspensions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tylerdouglass
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 14168
Location: Bellingham, WA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| StRawz11 wrote: | | tylerdouglass wrote: | | StRawz11 wrote: | | It was pretty clear Ed turned his head before contact. Still helmet to helmet, but he didn't hit hit with the crown |
Irrelevant. |
Not really. Crown of the helmet is much more dangerous |
They're equally illegal. The rule doesn't care about intent or which is more dangerous.
_________________
Last edited by tylerdouglass on Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tylerdouglass
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 14168
Location: Bellingham, WA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| as11osu wrote: | Goodell... worst ever.
Just quit already. |
What does Goodell have to do with this?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
reckless123
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 14907
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good that it was lifted, not worthy of a suspension. The egregious thing about this is that he was suspended for repetitive infractions but they date back to 2010. If he had been fined for the same thing 3 times in one year, fair enough you have an argument but 3 times over a 3 year period? C'mon man.
_________________
"I'm not in danger, I AM the DANGER" - Heisenberg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaguarfan
Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 24023
Location: IDOG on the sig <3
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Wait, all you have to do to get your suspension lifted is say "I don't think I should have been suspended" and the NFL just says "alright, 50,00 then"
Ok.
_________________
I hate the Jaguars |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flaccomania
Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 25917
Location: Parkville, MD
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jaguarfan wrote: | Wait, all you have to do to get your suspension lifted is say "I don't think I should have been suspended" and the NFL just says "alright, 50,00 then"
Ok. |
Yep, I'm sure that's all that was argued -- "Uh I disagee"... "Oh darn, we were hoping you agreed. Oh well, we overturn it."
_________________
| SnA ExclusiVe wrote: |
If a police officer offered me a warning, no, I would not take it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BaltimoreTerp
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 30739
Location: Washington, DC
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jaguarfan wrote: | Wait, all you have to do to get your suspension lifted is say "I don't think I should have been suspended" and the NFL just says "alright, 50,00 then"
Ok. |
Yep, that's why that whole Vilma-bounty thing was worked out so quick and cleanly.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BlaqOptic
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 34914
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| reckless123 wrote: | | Good that it was lifted, not worthy of a suspension. The egregious thing about this is that he was suspended for repetitive infractions but they date back to 2010. If he had been fined for the same thing 3 times in one year, fair enough you have an argument but 3 times over a 3 year period? C'mon man. |
While he shouldn't have been suspended in the first place this is the same thing that happened with Harrison.
_________________
| DannyB wrote: | | Your sodium-infused lamentations will fuel my body, mind, and spirit for this entire week. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scar988
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 29513
Location: Marietta, GA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| tylerdouglass wrote: |
That's not the guy who suspended him, is it?
Funny how that works out when the guy doing the appeals isn't the same guy who handed out the suspension. 
 |
yet, if they did this for bountygate, cottrell would rule against hte players there too.
_________________
Dirty Bird Watch: DL Jonathan Babineaux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steelcurtain29
Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 35182
Location: Monongahela, PA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| tylerdouglass wrote: |
That's not the guy who suspended him, is it?
Funny how that works out when the guy doing the appeals isn't the same guy who handed out the suspension.
|
Actually, it is. Cottrell was the one who suspended him, and lifted the suspension, on Ed Reed. No joke.
_________________
3DS Friend Code
4038-6129-7897
Pokemon X |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Malik
Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 4845
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Until we start penalizing offense players for helmet to helmet, I can't take anything about player safety seriously. There are like 25 tackles in each and every game when an offense player lowers his head into the defenders head when he has already started motioning to tackle below the offensive players head. In the majority of this cases it is physically impossible for a defender to re-react to the offensive players new position because of the time it takes for the brain to process motion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
reckless123
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 14907
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BlaqOptic wrote: | | reckless123 wrote: | | Good that it was lifted, not worthy of a suspension. The egregious thing about this is that he was suspended for repetitive infractions but they date back to 2010. If he had been fined for the same thing 3 times in one year, fair enough you have an argument but 3 times over a 3 year period? C'mon man. |
While he shouldn't have been suspended in the first place this is the same thing that happened with Harrison. |
Wasnt harrison's infractions all in one year or did it carry over from previous years?
_________________
"I'm not in danger, I AM the DANGER" - Heisenberg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BlaqOptic
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 34914
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| reckless123 wrote: | | BlaqOptic wrote: | | reckless123 wrote: | | Good that it was lifted, not worthy of a suspension. The egregious thing about this is that he was suspended for repetitive infractions but they date back to 2010. If he had been fined for the same thing 3 times in one year, fair enough you have an argument but 3 times over a 3 year period? C'mon man. |
While he shouldn't have been suspended in the first place this is the same thing that happened with Harrison. |
Wasnt harrison's infractions all in one year or did it carry over from previous years? |
Harrison hadn't had an infraction in over 16 games.
_________________
| DannyB wrote: | | Your sodium-infused lamentations will fuel my body, mind, and spirit for this entire week. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
