View previous topic :: View next topic |
Who is the better duo? Sherman and Browner or Tillman and Jennings |
Sherman and Browner |
|
74% |
[ 38 ] |
Tillman and Jennings |
|
25% |
[ 13 ] |
|
Total Votes : 51 |
|
Author |
Message |
chpjns15
Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 1753
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 3:04 am Post subject: Sherman and Browner vs Tillman and Jennings |
|
|
|
Pretty simple: Who is the better cornerback tandem, Richard Sherman and Brandon Browner of the Seattle Seahawks or Charles Tillman and Tim Jennings of the Chicago Bears?
I won't vote, to remove bias opinions.
Edit: I voted, but just to see what the results were  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RainbowCarebear 
Joined: 31 Aug 2011 Posts: 40372 Location: "Are you hungry, child?" Yes, she thought, but not for food.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Sherman and Browner, size and youth _________________
Kiltman on the sig |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Russell2Bailey 
Joined: 20 Mar 2008 Posts: 12901 Location: Where I will, I'll roam.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
RainbowCarebear wrote: | Sherman and Browner, size and youth | This. _________________
[quote="Reggie Nelson#1"] Radio-"Peyton give the ball to Ball. Ball drops the ball & Ball scoops it up! He's going downfield, TOUCHDOWN! Ball pats him on the back for when he lost the ball."[/quote] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. V 
Joined: 07 Sep 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Along with what the people above me said, the Seahawks CBs, particularly Sherman, have masted the contact within 5 yards rule and that really benefits them. _________________
Thank you daboyle250 for the sig. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pithy Radish
Joined: 16 May 2010 Posts: 675 Location: In a dirt field somewhere.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Mr. V wrote: | Along with what the people above me said, the Seahawks CBs, particularly Sherman, have masted the contact within 5 yards rule and that really benefits them. |
And after the 5 yards too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ECPackers 
Joined: 24 Oct 2010 Posts: 1434
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
i don't know why this is even a thread... we play against the bears duo twice a year, and twice a year its a win. idk what the big deal is. the seahawks, even though we won against them also, they at least held our offense down quite a bit. _________________ GREEN BAY PACKERS
Brewers
Bucks
Badgers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pithy Radish
Joined: 16 May 2010 Posts: 675 Location: In a dirt field somewhere.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
ECPackers wrote: | i don't know why this is even a thread... we play against the bears duo twice a year, and twice a year its a win. idk what the big deal is. the seahawks, even though we won against them also, they at least held our offense down quite a bit. |
Hold on there turbo, that is not what the scoreboard says. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
OneBadCat
Joined: 24 Aug 2012 Posts: 726
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll take the Seahawks. I feel like Tillman is overachieving and Jennings get's smoked on occasion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SaveourSonics 
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 45360 Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Great tandem either way. Both tandems are great at forcing turnovers, great in coverage, and great in run support. I wouldn't trade our tandem for anyone, but I think the Bears corners fit their system much better so I'm sure they wouldn't switch with any tandem either. _________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tom cody 
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 13515 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Tillman and Jennings. _________________ I bought one of those tapes to teach you Spanish in your sleep. During the night, the tape skipped. Now I can only stutter in Spanish.
Courtesy of an online joke search. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
darnell
Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 2135
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Both tandems are great where they are. Switch systems and both duos are out of their comfort zone. Though I would think, no matter the system that if you have Richard Sherman you just let him play man to man against the other teams best. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Plush 
Joined: 24 Sep 2012 Posts: 1553
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll take the guys that are better in run defense. I'll also take the tandem with the best overall cover corner of this group...by far
Thatll be Seattle |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
UofMfan909 
 Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 32442 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
SaveourSonics wrote: | Great tandem either way. Both tandems are great at forcing turnovers, great in coverage, and great in run support. I wouldn't trade our tandem for anyone, but I think the Bears corners fit their system much better so I'm sure they wouldn't switch with any tandem either. |
Usually you aren't the one to be humble about your team... but unfortunately, I'll take the Seahawks duo easily. Those two are nasty and both awesome. Sucks that SF is going to have to play them twice a year for quite a while to come. That whole secondary is insane. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tooki 
Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Posts: 10783
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
If you run zone? Go for the Bears duo. If you run a man-heavy or a press system? Go for the Seahawks duo.
Based on things like measurables and age, I would pick the Seahawks duo. They are younger, bigger and are as much a playmaker as Charles Tillman and Tim Jennings are. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brown_Mamba 
Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 1838 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would take Sherman and BB because of their size. Most of the top WR's in this league are tall, freakish athletes and shutting them down requires some size as well. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|