Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Another Leisher's 2013 Mock that you won't like
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jleisher


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 645
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 12:03 am    Post subject: Another Leisher's 2013 Mock that you won't like Reply with quote

I used Nfldraftscout.com and Walters Football.com for players rankings and insight. So, I don't care if you think a player will go higher or lower, please just think what if.

Restructures: Woodson and Pickett.
Resigns: WR Jennings (3 yrs at 30 mil, backloaded)
CB Shields, LB Walden, TE Crabtree

Outside FA's: TT surprises us all and signs 1, NT Terrance Knighton Jags.

Retires: Donald Driver WR (Hollywood here he comes)

Cuts: Benson, DJ Williams, Starks, Saturday, Francois, B.Jones, Zombo,
Van Roten, White, Saine, Barclay, Lattimore, Richardson.

Trade: JaMichael Finley TE to Dolphins for 3rd pick #81.

Comp: 4th rd for Flynn

Draft:

#23: Barrett Jones C/G/T Alabama 6'4" 305lbs. This should be a no brainer. Excellent fundamentals and can play all OL positions. Could be a starter at C, LT or RT. Offers insurance and depth.

#56: Larry Warford G Kentucky 6'3" 343lbs. Big strong athlete with some quickness. Better blocking for run then pass, but not bad at pass protection. Again, offers depth. TT is going OL like he went DL last year.

#81: Shawn Williams S Georgia Tough, Physical Safety with quickness and ball skills. Adds to our DBs.

#119. Shayne Skov ILB/OLB Stanford 6'3" 242lbs. Versatile LB who is tough defending the run as well as attacking pass-rusher. DUI and recoverying from injury may cause him to drop. With Bishop and Smith coming back from injury, Skov could surprise and start with Hawk.

Comp: Omaregie Uzzi G Georgia Tech 6'3" 302lbs. Yes, another OLinemen. Ideal for ZBS. Excellent mobility who can move to C in the pro's. Again, with EDS, Jones and Uzzi you have depth at C.

#151: Joseph Fauria TE UCLA 6'7" 255lbs. Well rounded TE, decent blocker and good route runner quality receiver.

#183: Zach Line FB SMU 6'1" 230lbs. Runs with power and good receiver out of the backfield. Could develope into a solid blocker and goal line FB. Either pushes Kuhn off roster or 1 TE, I vote TE.

#215: Collin Klein QB Kansas St. 6'5" 226lbs. Could develope into a good solid backup QB. Superb play maker who can run with the ball.
Someone for the PS.

53 Man roster:

QB: Rodgers, Harrell
RB: (Taylor), Green, (Line)
FB: Kuhn
WR: Nelson, Cobb, Jennings, Jones, Boykins
TE: Quarless, Crabtree, Taylor, (Fauria)
OT: Newhouse, Lang, Sherrod, Bulaga, (Jones)
OG: Sitton, (Warford), (Uzzi)
OC: EDS
K: Crosby
P: Masthay
LS: Goode

NT: Raji, Pickett, Knighton
DE: Neal, Worthy, Daniels, Wilson
OLB: Matthews, Walden, Perry, Moses, Manning
ILB: Hawk, (Skov), Bishop, Smith
CB: TWill, Shields, House, Hayward, Bush
S: Woodson, Burnett, McMilliam, Jennings, (Williams)

PS: Johnny White RB, Andrew Datko T, BJ Coleman QB, Johnny Jones DL.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Green90


Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 652
Location: Virginia
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Uhh, you have Taylor (Ryan Taylor?) starting at RB? Either that's a mistake, in which case you decimated our RB corps anyways, or it's not.... in which case I seriously question your football knowledge.
_________________
Webmaster wrote:
I also have a bitchin' camero
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ajdodge09


Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 4635
Location: Monterey Bay
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, not feeling the RB scenario.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jfinley88


Joined: 08 Feb 2010
Posts: 11585
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do not like this mock.
_________________
JammerHammer21 wrote:
jfin is one of those 1000 monkeys sitting at a typewriter that will eventually type out all of Shakespere.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vang_evo9


Joined: 13 Aug 2011
Posts: 1098
Location: Fresno, CA
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
TheGreatZepp


Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 2844
Location: Brookfield, WI
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thankfully the Packers have the White Wizard who would never allow this to happen.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13398
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

3 interior linemen in the first 4 rounds.
_________________
Webmaster wrote:
The difference is that this is a FOOTBALL forum. Heated debates about FOOTBALL are expected and encouraged. If you want to discuss your cure for Ebola, try ebolasfuture.com or any other appropriate forum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
PossibleCabbage


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 3305
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
3 interior linemen in the first 4 rounds.


For a team that has both their OGs signed until 2017...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MantyWrestler


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 362
Location: Manitowoc, WI
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This has to be one of the worst mock's I have ever seen. I'm at a loss for words other than that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CalhounLambeau


Joined: 05 May 2011
Posts: 2574
Location: #WI
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have us drafting a 300 pound, 305 pound guard and a 345 pound guard. Which one of those three doesn't make any sense considering the scheme and player prototypes we draft?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChaRisMa


Joined: 08 Mar 2007
Posts: 7283
Location: @_G_Tom
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not at all against this draft.

It's the runningback and QB spots that need work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
PackFan4Life


Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 4125
Location: De Pere, WI
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The big problem is using higher draft pics for "depth" spots on the roster as you but it. I am all for depth, but I want starters or immediate contributors out of rounds 1-4 if possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rbens06


Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 796
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with most everyone that this would not be a great situation. Aside from what was already mentioned, no way Lang stays at tackle, especially with a health Sherrod and Bulaga. Plus if Jones is the first round pick, something that I would like, he would play inside for us at C not a backup (third string) tackle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CallMeBarrett


Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 766
Location: Gainesville, Florida
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did you even try?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sandybaby716


Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 3645
Location: Rhode Island
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wow, a lot of unabashed hatred on it. I'm not a fan but it's not that far off. Frankly, we don't even know what our needs are yet. So I'm a little indifferent on each mock.

The weakest part of our offense is the line and we've been giving guys passes because we like their potential of they've had some mean stretches of play. It's realistic that Bulaga and Sherrod will never fully recover from their injuries and that EDS needs competition. The flexibility of the players selected could come in handy for line depth next season. Jones COULD play center. He'd be in competition with EDS. Sitton will be RG and Lang could be LG or RT. Newhouse is replaceable. Warford's size isnt the issue, is he athletic enough at that size? We'll find out at the combine. Could start at LG if Lang goes to RT.

After this draft, it's realistic that we have Jones at LT, Warford at LG, EDS at C, Sitton at RG and Lang at RT with Newhouse and Uzzi being the top backups.

So there is that.

I don't like the depth at RB after this draft, but I think Starks is brought back regardless. An UDFA could make the roster too. Taylor wont be a RB.
_________________
wgbeethree wrote:
In all fairness it is kind of rude to just lay injured at their feet while the Lions defensive players are trying to hold a completely unrelated dance party.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group