| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 6738
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:22 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| SDN40 wrote: | | MNPackfan32 wrote: | | SDN40 wrote: | | I'm not so sure you dont try to stash him if you can. Its not like we have a shortage of TE's on the roster and I dont think TT would be in a rush to cut any of them. That coupled with the numerous other injuries makes me think IR. This is based totally on the numbers game |
If he is healthy he is the #2 TE on this team. If he is healthy I play him and dont think twice about it. For my money I think he is the best blocking TE on the team and is probably the 2nd best receiving TE on the roster. I liked his pass pro out of the backfield and inline blocking, if he can go, I hope we use him. |
Who are you gonna cut ? Can we go with 5 TE's on a roster with so many injuries ? Thats a tough call IMO. |
IR Perry or Bulaga and that opens up a roster space. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SDN40
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 3459
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MNPackfan32 wrote: | | SDN40 wrote: | | MNPackfan32 wrote: | | SDN40 wrote: | | I'm not so sure you dont try to stash him if you can. Its not like we have a shortage of TE's on the roster and I dont think TT would be in a rush to cut any of them. That coupled with the numerous other injuries makes me think IR. This is based totally on the numbers game |
If he is healthy he is the #2 TE on this team. If he is healthy I play him and dont think twice about it. For my money I think he is the best blocking TE on the team and is probably the 2nd best receiving TE on the roster. I liked his pass pro out of the backfield and inline blocking, if he can go, I hope we use him. |
Who are you gonna cut ? Can we go with 5 TE's on a roster with so many injuries ? Thats a tough call IMO. |
IR Perry or Bulaga and that opens up a roster space. |
It opens up a roster space, but in most cases you want to replace the injured player with one that plays the same position to keep a balanced roster. We may not replace Perry with an OLB but I bet we replace Bulaga with an OL
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 6738
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SDN40 wrote: | | MNPackfan32 wrote: | | SDN40 wrote: | | MNPackfan32 wrote: | | SDN40 wrote: | | I'm not so sure you dont try to stash him if you can. Its not like we have a shortage of TE's on the roster and I dont think TT would be in a rush to cut any of them. That coupled with the numerous other injuries makes me think IR. This is based totally on the numbers game |
If he is healthy he is the #2 TE on this team. If he is healthy I play him and dont think twice about it. For my money I think he is the best blocking TE on the team and is probably the 2nd best receiving TE on the roster. I liked his pass pro out of the backfield and inline blocking, if he can go, I hope we use him. |
Who are you gonna cut ? Can we go with 5 TE's on a roster with so many injuries ? Thats a tough call IMO. |
IR Perry or Bulaga and that opens up a roster space. |
We already activated Zombo and IIRC we were at 52 so that was a free space. I see your point, but at the same time you keep the best 53 IMO. Why we kept Boykin IMO, he was one of the best 53, not that we needed a 6th WR.
It opens up a roster space, but in most cases you want to replace the injured player with one that plays the same position to keep a balanced roster. We may not replace Perry with an OLB but I bet we replace Bulaga with an OL |
We already activated Zombo and IIRC we were at 52 so that was a free space. I see your point, but at the same time you keep the best 53 IMO. Why we kept Boykin IMO, he was one of the best 53, not that we needed a 6th WR. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 10366
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think he goes in for Perry's spot. Already been said though.
_________________
| DavidatMIZZOU wrote: | | GBPACKMAN4LIFE wrote: | | At least they're not a cheating disgrace to their respective sports. |
We don't talk about Wilson here. There's a Seahawks board for that. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kgthekid
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 1204
Location: On the Maryland side of DC
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Seconding the activation while Perry is IR'd.
_________________
"There is a reason the IRS doesn't punish murderers who pay their taxes." -- Andy Staples |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Terranimal
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 254
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Perry had ligament surgery and was placed on IR. Quarless takes his place on roster..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 6738
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
@TomSilverstein
#Packers have activated TE Andrew Quarless to the 53-man roster and put rookie LB Nick Perry on injured reserve, according to an NFL source.
-I'll take credit for this, IM IN UR BRAIN TEMPSON!!!!!!!- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 10366
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
More tight ends:
A) Green Bay Packers
B) Hip Hop Videos
_________________
| DavidatMIZZOU wrote: | | GBPACKMAN4LIFE wrote: | | At least they're not a cheating disgrace to their respective sports. |
We don't talk about Wilson here. There's a Seahawks board for that. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 6738
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | More tight ends:
A) Green Bay Packers
B) Hip Hop Videos |
3. The Patriots |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
motorcycle
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 464
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| good luck and best wishes to Quarless!!! I'm so happy to see him back again. If he plays as well as last season then good news for our run game, meaning good news for Rodgers' playactioning, meaning good news for superb owling. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Terranimal
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 254
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MNPackfan32 wrote: | @TomSilverstein
#Packers have activated TE Andrew Quarless to the 53-man roster and put rookie LB Nick Perry on injured reserve, according to an NFL source.
-I'll take credit for this, IM IN UR BRAIN TEMPSON!!!!!!!- |
LOLs...beat you by 4 minutes...got mine form GBPG off twitter....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheGreatZepp
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 2844
Location: Brookfield, WI
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Here's to hoping that Quarless brings back a complete TE to the Packers. Need a TE that can catch downfield AND block. Really hope Q uses November to get back in football shape and is getting in the groove in time for week 15 at Soldier Field. More likely though, he isn't himself this year but I'm just happy to hear that he's back on the field.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
General_Bean
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 1048
Location: Crossroads of CT
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Quarless' time is NOW
_________________
Packers fan since 93. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
