Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Quarless's Time is Up
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MNPackfan32


Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 7889
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SDN40 wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
SDN40 wrote:
I'm not so sure you dont try to stash him if you can. Its not like we have a shortage of TE's on the roster and I dont think TT would be in a rush to cut any of them. That coupled with the numerous other injuries makes me think IR. This is based totally on the numbers game
If he is healthy he is the #2 TE on this team. If he is healthy I play him and dont think twice about it. For my money I think he is the best blocking TE on the team and is probably the 2nd best receiving TE on the roster. I liked his pass pro out of the backfield and inline blocking, if he can go, I hope we use him.


Who are you gonna cut ? Can we go with 5 TE's on a roster with so many injuries ? Thats a tough call IMO.
IR Perry or Bulaga and that opens up a roster space.
_________________



Duff Man wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
Josh Sitton, Mike Daniels

Average at best
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDN40


Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 3705
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MNPackfan32 wrote:
SDN40 wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
SDN40 wrote:
I'm not so sure you dont try to stash him if you can. Its not like we have a shortage of TE's on the roster and I dont think TT would be in a rush to cut any of them. That coupled with the numerous other injuries makes me think IR. This is based totally on the numbers game
If he is healthy he is the #2 TE on this team. If he is healthy I play him and dont think twice about it. For my money I think he is the best blocking TE on the team and is probably the 2nd best receiving TE on the roster. I liked his pass pro out of the backfield and inline blocking, if he can go, I hope we use him.


Who are you gonna cut ? Can we go with 5 TE's on a roster with so many injuries ? Thats a tough call IMO.
IR Perry or Bulaga and that opens up a roster space.


It opens up a roster space, but in most cases you want to replace the injured player with one that plays the same position to keep a balanced roster. We may not replace Perry with an OLB but I bet we replace Bulaga with an OL
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MNPackfan32


Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 7889
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SDN40 wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
SDN40 wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
SDN40 wrote:
I'm not so sure you dont try to stash him if you can. Its not like we have a shortage of TE's on the roster and I dont think TT would be in a rush to cut any of them. That coupled with the numerous other injuries makes me think IR. This is based totally on the numbers game
If he is healthy he is the #2 TE on this team. If he is healthy I play him and dont think twice about it. For my money I think he is the best blocking TE on the team and is probably the 2nd best receiving TE on the roster. I liked his pass pro out of the backfield and inline blocking, if he can go, I hope we use him.


Who are you gonna cut ? Can we go with 5 TE's on a roster with so many injuries ? Thats a tough call IMO.
IR Perry or Bulaga and that opens up a roster space.

We already activated Zombo and IIRC we were at 52 so that was a free space. I see your point, but at the same time you keep the best 53 IMO. Why we kept Boykin IMO, he was one of the best 53, not that we needed a 6th WR.
It opens up a roster space, but in most cases you want to replace the injured player with one that plays the same position to keep a balanced roster. We may not replace Perry with an OLB but I bet we replace Bulaga with an OL
We already activated Zombo and IIRC we were at 52 so that was a free space. I see your point, but at the same time you keep the best 53 IMO. Why we kept Boykin IMO, he was one of the best 53, not that we needed a 6th WR.
_________________



Duff Man wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
Josh Sitton, Mike Daniels

Average at best
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13094
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think he goes in for Perry's spot. Already been said though.
_________________
Pugger wrote:
Pugger? Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kgthekid


Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 1468
Location: On the Maryland side of DC
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seconding the activation while Perry is IR'd.
_________________

Fuzzy Slippers tells no lies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Terranimal


Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 256
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perry had ligament surgery and was placed on IR. Quarless takes his place on roster.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MNPackfan32


Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 7889
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@TomSilverstein

#Packers have activated TE Andrew Quarless to the 53-man roster and put rookie LB Nick Perry on injured reserve, according to an NFL source.

-I'll take credit for this, IM IN UR BRAIN TEMPSON!!!!!!!-
_________________



Duff Man wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
Josh Sitton, Mike Daniels

Average at best
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13094
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More tight ends:
A) Green Bay Packers
B) Hip Hop Videos
_________________
Pugger wrote:
Pugger? Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MNPackfan32


Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 7889
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
More tight ends:
A) Green Bay Packers
B) Hip Hop Videos
3. The Patriots
_________________



Duff Man wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
Josh Sitton, Mike Daniels

Average at best
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
motorcycle


Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 472
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

good luck and best wishes to Quarless!!! I'm so happy to see him back again. If he plays as well as last season then good news for our run game, meaning good news for Rodgers' playactioning, meaning good news for superb owling.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Terranimal


Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 256
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MNPackfan32 wrote:
@TomSilverstein

#Packers have activated TE Andrew Quarless to the 53-man roster and put rookie LB Nick Perry on injured reserve, according to an NFL source.

-I'll take credit for this, IM IN UR BRAIN TEMPSON!!!!!!!-


LOLs...beat you by 4 minutes...got mine form GBPG off twitter.... Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheGreatZepp


Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 2844
Location: Brookfield, WI
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's to hoping that Quarless brings back a complete TE to the Packers. Need a TE that can catch downfield AND block. Really hope Q uses November to get back in football shape and is getting in the groove in time for week 15 at Soldier Field. More likely though, he isn't himself this year but I'm just happy to hear that he's back on the field.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
General_Bean


Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 1256
Location: Crossroads of CT
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quarless' time is NOW
_________________
Packers fan since 93.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group