| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Terranimal
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 254
Location: Wisconsin
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:48 pm Post subject: Quarless's Time is Up |
 |
|
|
| GBPG twitter says today is the day when Quarless either gets activated or has to go on IR. They are waiting to find out which way it's going to go..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 5716
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:02 pm Post subject: Re: Quarless's Time is Up |
|
|
|
| Terranimal wrote: | | GBPG twitter says today is the day when Quarless either gets activated or has to go on IR. They are waiting to find out which way it's going to go..... |
I wouldn't be shocked if we activate Quarless and put Perry on IR. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Terranimal
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 254
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:10 pm Post subject: Re: Quarless's Time is Up |
|
|
|
| MNPackfan32 wrote: | | Terranimal wrote: | | GBPG twitter says today is the day when Quarless either gets activated or has to go on IR. They are waiting to find out which way it's going to go..... |
I wouldn't be shocked if we activate Quarless and put Perry on IR. |
That makes sense.
But also bulaga is up in the air also and they just took Sherrod off the PUP list, so he now has 3 weeks to be activated or IRed...if what i read late last night is correct on GBPG twitter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IrishGreen
Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 31030
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
i honestly wouldn't mind IRing Quarless again and just getting him back next season full strength
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blankman0021
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 1454
Location: MKE
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| IrishGreen wrote: | | i honestly wouldn't mind IRing Quarless again and just getting him back next season full strength |
Good in theory, but that's a lot of wasted $$ if he could have contributed this year in some fashion. People play hurt, part of the game...it's just if they can be effective doing so (and able to play without risk of further injury).
_________________
Read More. Post Less. Unless you're on Twitter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stu29er
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 84
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| My guess is that Quarless and Sherrod are placed on IR. They'll probably wait a week or two to place Perry on IR. Seems that they wait a little while when they're not exactly sure if its a season ending injury. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PossibleCabbage
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 2454
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| stu29er wrote: | | My guess is that Quarless and Sherrod are placed on IR. They'll probably wait a week or two to place Perry on IR. Seems that they wait a little while when they're not exactly sure if its a season ending injury. |
Sherrod was just activated from whichever PUP list he was on, and now has a couple weeks to practice before the Packers have to make a decision on him.
Today is that decision on Quarless.
Also, fix your avatar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stu29er
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 84
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PossibleCabbage wrote: | | stu29er wrote: | | My guess is that Quarless and Sherrod are placed on IR. They'll probably wait a week or two to place Perry on IR. Seems that they wait a little while when they're not exactly sure if its a season ending injury. |
Sherrod was just activated from whichever PUP list he was on, and now has a couple weeks to practice before the Packers have to make a decision on him.
Today is that decision on Quarless.
Also, fix your avatar. |
Done, realized after I posted that it was a little large.
I didn't realize that Sherrod was just activated. So that's good, buys some time. But not sure if he's going to be back this year. Hope so but not counting on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I Am Rodgers
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 6447
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Pretty sure we added Q to the roster. I saw a tweet somewhere that said it. I'll try and find it.
Think I'm mistaken. Can't find it. Maybe I misread a prediction tweet.
_________________
| ChaRisMa wrote: | | I thought I was the only one adding three inches. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 5716
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I Am Rodgers wrote: | Pretty sure we added Q to the roster. I saw a tweet somewhere that said it. I'll try and find it.
Think I'm mistaken. Can't find it. Maybe I misread a prediction tweet. |
My guess is they will activate him, you always want to wait as long as you can, not because Quarless isn't healthy, but because of these types of situations. If you activate him early you have to make room for him and either cut or IR a player, going as long as you can only makes the most sense. If Quarless wasn't healthy I have very little doubt that our staff would have treated him with kid gloves and put him on IR and not returned him to practice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GoPackGo
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 2291
Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It would be nice if he could go this year. He's the closest we have to a Finley skillset on the team at the TE position.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SDN40
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 3136
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm not so sure you dont try to stash him if you can. Its not like we have a shortage of TE's on the roster and I dont think TT would be in a rush to cut any of them. That coupled with the numerous other injuries makes me think IR. This is based totally on the numbers game
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 5716
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SDN40 wrote: | | I'm not so sure you dont try to stash him if you can. Its not like we have a shortage of TE's on the roster and I dont think TT would be in a rush to cut any of them. That coupled with the numerous other injuries makes me think IR. This is based totally on the numbers game |
If he is healthy he is the #2 TE on this team. If he is healthy I play him and dont think twice about it. For my money I think he is the best blocking TE on the team and is probably the 2nd best receiving TE on the roster. I liked his pass pro out of the backfield and inline blocking, if he can go, I hope we use him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SDN40
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 3136
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MNPackfan32 wrote: | | SDN40 wrote: | | I'm not so sure you dont try to stash him if you can. Its not like we have a shortage of TE's on the roster and I dont think TT would be in a rush to cut any of them. That coupled with the numerous other injuries makes me think IR. This is based totally on the numbers game |
If he is healthy he is the #2 TE on this team. If he is healthy I play him and dont think twice about it. For my money I think he is the best blocking TE on the team and is probably the 2nd best receiving TE on the roster. I liked his pass pro out of the backfield and inline blocking, if he can go, I hope we use him. |
Who are you gonna cut ? Can we go with 5 TE's on a roster with so many injuries ? Thats a tough call IMO.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ugLymayNe
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 10796
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SDN40 wrote: | | Who are you gonna cut ? Can we go with 5 TE's on a roster with so many injuries ? Thats a tough call IMO. |
With Kuhn out - it is a possibility.
_________________
@PJHotel_
| jfinley88 wrote: | | All I drink is capri suns, sunny delight, and womenly alcoholic drinks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
