| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
21 ALL THE WAY 
Joined: 18 Dec 2008 Posts: 2896 Location: WASHINGTON DC
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | Brian23 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | Where is this team improving at? |
You didn't answer his question halfway through the 3rd year is not 4, almost 5, years into his rebuild.
Reality is our team is extremely young, there's solid talent to build off of there. The defense has been riddled with injuries and needs upgrades, no doubt, but its not as bad as people make it out to be.
And if you can't see the offenses progression then there's no helping you.  |
I did, I said I made a mistake in the year thing. If you can't see the set back as well than there's no helping you Shannahan and getting good RB's is just a gift he has so him getting Morris is nothing new. Only thing he did was get us in position to get RG3 (thatz it thatz all) Yes we started out strong looking like a good offense, but now teams have caught up to our scheme. What has this offense looked like since then? He drafted two great DE's and turned them into nothing more than average 3-4 OLBS, drove Haynesworth away (we may never wouldve gotten 100 million dollars worth of production from him, but he did help the DL while here in the 4-3) Imagine a DL of Orakpo, Hayneworth, and Kerrigan (wow explosive) So tell me what he has done? | You edited your answer. Shanahan didn't draft Orakpo. Arguing for keeping Haynesworth isn't helping your arguement. |
Im still waiting for you to answer my question. What has this offense looked like since teams have caught on to our scheme and what has Mike done other than get us RG3 since here? | What have they looked like when? The last TWO games? They haven't played very well for TWO games. I agree with you, for TWO games the offense hasn't performed (TWO). You dismiss Shanahan's contributions to the running game because "getting good RBs is a gift he has". So because someone is good at something that shouldn't count? Our depth chart at RB has been completely overhauled with Morris, Royster, and Helu. He acquired a talented young LT in Williams. He brought in Lich at LG, Chester at RG. He signed Garcon and Morgan. He acquired Carriker in a very cheap trade. He signed NT Cofield. He signed Bowen who last year with a healthy front 7 had multiple sacks. He drafted Perry Riley who's a starter. He drafted Kerrigan who's a playmaker on defense. I can go on and on about how much better he's made this team. |
He also wasted picks in trading for Mcnabb and Brown. Change a good 4-3 D into a [inappropriate/removed] 3-4 D. Brung in [inappropriate/removed] Hasslet to coach the 3-4 D. Brung in his son as OC who if any where else wouldve been fired with the way our offense has performed these 3 1/2 season same the D coordinator he brung in. Mike has been here since 2010 meaning this he is in the 3rd year as a our HC and we are 1/2 way through the season. Thatz where I get the 3 1/2. | You would subtract that 1/2 making it 2 and 1/2. I can't debate with someone who doesn't understand this. |
Ur rite about the 2 1/2. Missed calculating on my part. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MKnight82
Joined: 04 Mar 2009 Posts: 1414
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | Brian23 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | Where is this team improving at? |
You didn't answer his question halfway through the 3rd year is not 4, almost 5, years into his rebuild.
Reality is our team is extremely young, there's solid talent to build off of there. The defense has been riddled with injuries and needs upgrades, no doubt, but its not as bad as people make it out to be.
And if you can't see the offenses progression then there's no helping you.  |
I did, I said I made a mistake in the year thing. If you can't see the set back as well than there's no helping you Shannahan and getting good RB's is just a gift he has so him getting Morris is nothing new. Only thing he did was get us in position to get RG3 (thatz it thatz all) Yes we started out strong looking like a good offense, but now teams have caught up to our scheme. What has this offense looked like since then? He drafted two great DE's and turned them into nothing more than average 3-4 OLBS, drove Haynesworth away (we may never wouldve gotten 100 million dollars worth of production from him, but he did help the DL while here in the 4-3) Imagine a DL of Orakpo, Hayneworth, and Kerrigan (wow explosive) So tell me what he has done? | You edited your answer. Shanahan didn't draft Orakpo. Arguing for keeping Haynesworth isn't helping your arguement. |
Im still waiting for you to answer my question. What has this offense looked like since teams have caught on to our scheme and what has Mike done other than get us RG3 since here? | What have they looked like when? The last TWO games? They haven't played very well for TWO games. I agree with you, for TWO games the offense hasn't performed (TWO). You dismiss Shanahan's contributions to the running game because "getting good RBs is a gift he has". So because someone is good at something that shouldn't count? Our depth chart at RB has been completely overhauled with Morris, Royster, and Helu. He acquired a talented young LT in Williams. He brought in Lich at LG, Chester at RG. He signed Garcon and Morgan. He acquired Carriker in a very cheap trade. He signed NT Cofield. He signed Bowen who last year with a healthy front 7 had multiple sacks. He drafted Perry Riley who's a starter. He drafted Kerrigan who's a playmaker on defense. I can go on and on about how much better he's made this team. |
He also wasted picks in trading for Mcnabb and Brown. Change a good 4-3 D into a [inappropriate/removed] 3-4 D. Brung in [inappropriate/removed] Hasslet to coach the 3-4 D. Brung in his son as OC who if any where else wouldve been fired with the way our offense has performed these 3 1/2 season same the D coordinator he brung in. Mike has been here since 2010 meaning this he is in the 3rd year as a our HC and we are 1/2 way through the season. Thatz where I get the 3 1/2. | You would subtract that 1/2 making it 2 and 1/2. I can't debate with someone who doesn't understand this. |
Ur rite about the 2 1/2. Missed calculating on my part. | I'm just as disappointed about losing as you are. I just really think blowing up the coaching staff halfway through a rebuilding process is a bad idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
21 ALL THE WAY 
Joined: 18 Dec 2008 Posts: 2896 Location: WASHINGTON DC
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | MKnight82 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | Brian23 wrote: | | 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | Where is this team improving at? |
You didn't answer his question halfway through the 3rd year is not 4, almost 5, years into his rebuild.
Reality is our team is extremely young, there's solid talent to build off of there. The defense has been riddled with injuries and needs upgrades, no doubt, but its not as bad as people make it out to be.
And if you can't see the offenses progression then there's no helping you.  |
I did, I said I made a mistake in the year thing. If you can't see the set back as well than there's no helping you Shannahan and getting good RB's is just a gift he has so him getting Morris is nothing new. Only thing he did was get us in position to get RG3 (thatz it thatz all) Yes we started out strong looking like a good offense, but now teams have caught up to our scheme. What has this offense looked like since then? He drafted two great DE's and turned them into nothing more than average 3-4 OLBS, drove Haynesworth away (we may never wouldve gotten 100 million dollars worth of production from him, but he did help the DL while here in the 4-3) Imagine a DL of Orakpo, Hayneworth, and Kerrigan (wow explosive) So tell me what he has done? | You edited your answer. Shanahan didn't draft Orakpo. Arguing for keeping Haynesworth isn't helping your arguement. |
Im still waiting for you to answer my question. What has this offense looked like since teams have caught on to our scheme and what has Mike done other than get us RG3 since here? | What have they looked like when? The last TWO games? They haven't played very well for TWO games. I agree with you, for TWO games the offense hasn't performed (TWO). You dismiss Shanahan's contributions to the running game because "getting good RBs is a gift he has". So because someone is good at something that shouldn't count? Our depth chart at RB has been completely overhauled with Morris, Royster, and Helu. He acquired a talented young LT in Williams. He brought in Lich at LG, Chester at RG. He signed Garcon and Morgan. He acquired Carriker in a very cheap trade. He signed NT Cofield. He signed Bowen who last year with a healthy front 7 had multiple sacks. He drafted Perry Riley who's a starter. He drafted Kerrigan who's a playmaker on defense. I can go on and on about how much better he's made this team. |
He also wasted picks in trading for Mcnabb and Brown. Change a good 4-3 D into a [inappropriate/removed] 3-4 D. Brung in [inappropriate/removed] Hasslet to coach the 3-4 D. Brung in his son as OC who if any where else wouldve been fired with the way our offense has performed these 3 1/2 season same the D coordinator he brung in. Mike has been here since 2010 meaning this he is in the 3rd year as a our HC and we are 1/2 way through the season. Thatz where I get the 3 1/2. | You would subtract that 1/2 making it 2 and 1/2. I can't debate with someone who doesn't understand this. |
Ur rite about the 2 1/2. Missed calculating on my part. | I'm just as disappointed about losing as you are. I just really think blowing up the coaching staff halfway through a rebuilding process is a bad idea. |
I agree to disagree. I just really don't see Shanahann as the guy to get us to the promise land, I would understand you more so if I saw more production out of this franchise since he's been here. Play-calling on both sides of the ball is a huge thing I think Sean and a new D coordinator would fix rather quickly if the job was wanted by Payton. We have a QB now so just imagine Payton allowing Rg3 to be just as dynamic as Brees instead of this Pistol/Option QB that Rg3 is in Mike's offense. IMO that is hurting Rg3 more than helping. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turtle28 
Joined: 21 Nov 2007 Posts: 53097 Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He's not really on the market. The saints will re-sign him.
Dan Snyder isn't going to fire Mike Shanahan either. Although I do agree that Shanahan isn't the greatest coach. I think he deserves to finish his contract. _________________
mike23md
Days until:Minicamp 21; Training camp 65; Eagles @ Redskins 111 RIP SSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DarrellGreen28
Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Posts: 408 Location: Rockville, MD
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| turtle28 wrote: | He's not really on the market. The saints will re-sign him.
Dan Snyder isn't going to fire Mike Shanahan either. Although I do agree that Shanahan isn't the greatest coach. I think he deserves to finish his contract. |
But why waste 5 years like that? In the NFL, if you aren't doing a good job, you lose your job. And in his three years, Shanahan has gone 6-10, 5-11, and might even go 3-13 and 4-12 this year without having the luxury of a high draft pick. That kind of production is awful. Even Jim Zorn put one 8-8 season out for us. _________________ RG3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FosterTheSkins 
Joined: 19 Oct 2012 Posts: 329
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DarrellGreen28 wrote: | | turtle28 wrote: | He's not really on the market. The saints will re-sign him.
Dan Snyder isn't going to fire Mike Shanahan either. Although I do agree that Shanahan isn't the greatest coach. I think he deserves to finish his contract. |
But why waste 5 years like that? In the NFL, if you aren't doing a good job, you lose your job. And in his three years, Shanahan has gone 6-10, 5-11, and might even go 3-13 and 4-12 this year without having the luxury of a high draft pick. That kind of production is awful. Even Jim Zorn put one 8-8 season out for us. |
I do find it worrisome the teams record is getting worse and worse each year. The trend seems to be the more Shanahans fingerprints are on the Skins they turn into smudges. The offense has looked immensely better this season (barring the last two games) but its only looked better since RG3 arrived. Mikes first two years the Skins struggled to put up points and had looked pedestrian at best. Even if the O continues to do well what is it worth if the team isn't winning; making playoff runs?
The Redskins had an awesome Defense the past decade but never made the playoffs on a regular basis. The only difference so far is the roles have reversed the sides of the ball. And heaven forbid something happens to our beloved QB?
We have the same problem as before, it seems, no proper GM who can put the pieces together to form a real, whole team.
The worse part is we have to stick with Shanahan. If we bring in another coach RG3 will have to learn a new offense in his consecutive year. That might have played a part in retarding Jason Campbell's development. And without a doubt you can kiss any chance of a playoff run for sure that year and the year after. Mike has just now gotten a franchise player under center. The best thing to do is let him have at least one more year to work with him. _________________ All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
You better run, better run, outrun my QB
All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
You better run, better run, faster than RG3. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turtle28 
Joined: 21 Nov 2007 Posts: 53097 Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DarrellGreen28 wrote: | | turtle28 wrote: | He's not really on the market. The saints will re-sign him.
Dan Snyder isn't going to fire Mike Shanahan either. Although I do agree that Shanahan isn't the greatest coach. I think he deserves to finish his contract. |
But why waste 5 years like that? In the NFL, if you aren't doing a good job, you lose your job. And in his three years, Shanahan has gone 6-10, 5-11, and might even go 3-13 and 4-12 this year without having the luxury of a high draft pick. That kind of production is awful. Even Jim Zorn put one 8-8 season out for us. | he's built our team through youth the last two seasons as good than anyone since Casserly. Our team is extremely young and developing. Old/patchwork in only a few positions. They need time to develop into a team and as individual players. We are missing our best two receiving options on offense, our best pass rusher and arguably our best DL also. You can't just magically replace hat talent/production with reserves.
I don't think we should be blowing up everything at this point, right in the middle of Shn/Allen rebuilding of the entire franchise... Yeah, no thanks _________________
mike23md
Days until:Minicamp 21; Training camp 65; Eagles @ Redskins 111 RIP SSF
Last edited by turtle28 on Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turtle28 
Joined: 21 Nov 2007 Posts: 53097 Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FosterTheSkins wrote: | | DarrellGreen28 wrote: | | turtle28 wrote: | He's not really on the market. The saints will re-sign him.
Dan Snyder isn't going to fire Mike Shanahan either. Although I do agree that Shanahan isn't the greatest coach. I think he deserves to finish his contract. |
But why waste 5 years like that? In the NFL, if you aren't doing a good job, you lose your job. And in his three years, Shanahan has gone 6-10, 5-11, and might even go 3-13 and 4-12 this year without having the luxury of a high draft pick. That kind of production is awful. Even Jim Zorn put one 8-8 season out for us. |
I do find it worrisome the teams record is getting worse and worse each year. The trend seems to be the more Shanahans fingerprints are on the Skins they turn into smudges. The offense has looked immensely better this season (barring the last two games) but its only looked better since RG3 arrived. Mikes first two years the Skins struggled to put up points and had looked pedestrian at best. Even if the O continues to do well what is it worth if the team isn't winning; making playoff runs?
The Redskins had an awesome Defense the past decade but never made the playoffs on a regular basis. The only difference so far is the roles have reversed the sides of the ball. And heaven forbid something happens to our beloved QB?
We have the same problem as before, it seems, no proper GM who can put the pieces together to form a real, whole team.
The worse part is we have to stick with Shanahan. If we bring in another coach RG3 will have to learn a new offense in his consecutive year. That might have played a part in retarding Jason Campbell's development. And without a doubt you can kiss any chance of a playoff run for sure that year and the year after. Mike has just now gotten a franchise player under center. The best thing to do is let him have at least one more year to work with him. | great points Foster. I definitely agree. Is that Stephen Davis in your avatar? One of my favorite skins ever _________________
mike23md
Days until:Minicamp 21; Training camp 65; Eagles @ Redskins 111 RIP SSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FosterTheSkins 
Joined: 19 Oct 2012 Posts: 329
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Thanks Turtle. Yeah its Stephen Davis (one of my all time faves too). _________________ All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
You better run, better run, outrun my QB
All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
You better run, better run, faster than RG3. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
footy_29 
Joined: 31 Jan 2007 Posts: 11161 Location: The Frozen Tundra that is Canada
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I can understand impatience, but I see it for what it is and dismiss it. Moving on from Shanahan would be a Dan Snyder move circa early 2000s. That's all I'm going to say about that.
Off-season: Jammal Brown re-injures hip. (Polumbus has struggled)
Pre-season: Lose both starting safeties, reserve NT, #1 and #2 RB (Royster just returned)
Game One: Lose your #1 receiver.
Game Two: Lose your best pass-rusher and top DE.
Game Seven: Lose your starting TE
Other factors:
Griffin is a rookie - yes, he has played better than a rookie, but this playbook is limited to accommodate his learning curve.
London Fletcher's steep decline.
Defensive backs looking lost.
In sum:
The depth of this team is young and/or lacking. When you take away several key starters, any team will have issues. When it is a young team, those issues will be amplified.
No excuses for Haslett and Morris - they should be able to make adjustments, and there seems to be a lot of miscommunication out there. Perhaps the decline of Fletch is a big impact - and he's certainly been picked on by opposing offenses - but there is enough talent to be playing better even with a declining captain. _________________
Blknite01's masterpiece |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
turtle28 
Joined: 21 Nov 2007 Posts: 53097 Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| footy_29 wrote: | I can understand impatience, but I see it for what it is and dismiss it. Moving on from Shanahan would be a Dan Snyder move circa early 2000s. That's all I'm going to say about that.
Off-season: Jammal Brown re-injures hip. (Polumbus has struggled)
Pre-season: Lose both starting safeties, reserve NT, #1 and #2 RB (Royster just returned)
Game One: Lose your #1 receiver.
Game Two: Lose your best pass-rusher and top DE.
Game Seven: Lose your starting TE
Other factors:
Griffin is a rookie - yes, he has played better than a rookie, but this playbook is limited to accommodate his learning curve.
London Fletcher's steep decline.
Defensive backs looking lost.
In sum:
The depth of this team is young and/or lacking. When you take away several key starters, any team will have issues. When it is a young team, those issues will be amplified.
No excuses for Haslett and Morris - they should be able to make adjustments, and there seems to be a lot of miscommunication out there. Perhaps the decline of Fletch is a big impact - and he's certainly been picked on by opposing offenses - but there is enough talent to be playing better even with a declining captain. | agree with everything but the final paragraph.
I'm just wondering where you are seeing this talent on defense? because I'm not.
Bowen- average to good
Cofield- average to good
Jenkins- average to good. Recovering still from missing last year
Jackson- average OLB at best
Fletcher- hamper by injuries
Riley- good Ilb
Kerrigan- good OLB, still developing and really missing Orakpo
DHall- horrible
C Griffin- horrible
Wilson- average. Starts but really like a #3
Doughty- back up material. Good run defender, not vs pass
M Williams- back up material
Where's our talent on defense without Carriker and Orakpo? _________________
mike23md
Days until:Minicamp 21; Training camp 65; Eagles @ Redskins 111 RIP SSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dashing 
Joined: 10 Jul 2011 Posts: 2809
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sean Payton will be a Cowboys watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mike23md 
Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Posts: 6505
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dashing wrote: | | Sean Payton will be a Cowboys watch. |
With the current state of the Cowboys, it could be inevitable that Payton ends up as the Cowboys head coach. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
footy_29 
Joined: 31 Jan 2007 Posts: 11161 Location: The Frozen Tundra that is Canada
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| turtle28 wrote: | | footy_29 wrote: | I can understand impatience, but I see it for what it is and dismiss it. Moving on from Shanahan would be a Dan Snyder move circa early 2000s. That's all I'm going to say about that.
Off-season: Jammal Brown re-injures hip. (Polumbus has struggled)
Pre-season: Lose both starting safeties, reserve NT, #1 and #2 RB (Royster just returned)
Game One: Lose your #1 receiver.
Game Two: Lose your best pass-rusher and top DE.
Game Seven: Lose your starting TE
Other factors:
Griffin is a rookie - yes, he has played better than a rookie, but this playbook is limited to accommodate his learning curve.
London Fletcher's steep decline.
Defensive backs looking lost.
In sum:
The depth of this team is young and/or lacking. When you take away several key starters, any team will have issues. When it is a young team, those issues will be amplified.
No excuses for Haslett and Morris - they should be able to make adjustments, and there seems to be a lot of miscommunication out there. Perhaps the decline of Fletch is a big impact - and he's certainly been picked on by opposing offenses - but there is enough talent to be playing better even with a declining captain. | agree with everything but the final paragraph.
I'm just wondering where you are seeing this talent on defense? because I'm not.
Bowen- average to good
Cofield- average to good
Jenkins- average to good. Recovering still from missing last year
Jackson- average OLB at best
Fletcher- hamper by injuries
Riley- good Ilb
Kerrigan- good OLB, still developing and really missing Orakpo
DHall- horrible
C Griffin- horrible
Wilson- average. Starts but really like a #3
Doughty- back up material. Good run defender, not vs pass
M Williams- back up material
Where's our talent on defense without Carriker and Orakpo? |
Bowen, Cofield, Kerrigan, DeHall, J.Wilson are all talented players. Riley and Zo have played relatively well, Cedric Griffin has not been as bad as advertised (still not great). There are teams with 'worse' personnel who are doing more. Even with Fletcher's decline, this is still an NFL roster and should not be surrendering this much yardage through the air. _________________
Blknite01's masterpiece |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thaiphoon 
Joined: 03 Jan 2007 Posts: 12265 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| footy_29 wrote: | | turtle28 wrote: | | footy_29 wrote: | I can understand impatience, but I see it for what it is and dismiss it. Moving on from Shanahan would be a Dan Snyder move circa early 2000s. That's all I'm going to say about that.
Off-season: Jammal Brown re-injures hip. (Polumbus has struggled)
Pre-season: Lose both starting safeties, reserve NT, #1 and #2 RB (Royster just returned)
Game One: Lose your #1 receiver.
Game Two: Lose your best pass-rusher and top DE.
Game Seven: Lose your starting TE
Other factors:
Griffin is a rookie - yes, he has played better than a rookie, but this playbook is limited to accommodate his learning curve.
London Fletcher's steep decline.
Defensive backs looking lost.
In sum:
The depth of this team is young and/or lacking. When you take away several key starters, any team will have issues. When it is a young team, those issues will be amplified.
No excuses for Haslett and Morris - they should be able to make adjustments, and there seems to be a lot of miscommunication out there. Perhaps the decline of Fletch is a big impact - and he's certainly been picked on by opposing offenses - but there is enough talent to be playing better even with a declining captain. | agree with everything but the final paragraph.
I'm just wondering where you are seeing this talent on defense? because I'm not.
Bowen- average to good
Cofield- average to good
Jenkins- average to good. Recovering still from missing last year
Jackson- average OLB at best
Fletcher- hamper by injuries
Riley- good Ilb
Kerrigan- good OLB, still developing and really missing Orakpo
DHall- horrible
C Griffin- horrible
Wilson- average. Starts but really like a #3
Doughty- back up material. Good run defender, not vs pass
M Williams- back up material
Where's our talent on defense without Carriker and Orakpo? |
Bowen, Cofield, Kerrigan, DeHall, J.Wilson are all talented players. Riley and Zo have played relatively well, Cedric Griffin has not been as bad as advertised (still not great). There are teams with 'worse' personnel who are doing more. Even with Fletcher's decline, this is still an NFL roster and should not be surrendering this much yardage through the air. |
Which brings me back to...
Coaching!! _________________
Being Vague Is Almost As Much Fun As That Other Thing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|