| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tonyto3690 
Joined: 29 Jan 2010 Posts: 5506
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:02 pm Post subject: Has Spikes become our best linebacker? |
|
|
|
Week after week he not only does a great job stuffing the run, he has developed as a blitzer. The best of him though is his intangibles. He is a mauler in the middle who seems to always be making game saving (or should be game saving) plays for us. Like welker, it's awesome how he always has monster games for us in big games. He never disappears and is always forcing the issue.
The flip side of this is obviously where does he rank compared to mayo. Mayo has been a leader and really good for us, but while he is superior in coverage, he never seems to make those game alternating plays. He is good against the run but I personally dont get the feel of gamechanger when I watch him.
Who do you got? _________________
| C0LTSFAN4L1F3 wrote: |
Drew Brees IS the most accurate qb ever |
Brees that night:
28/50, 341 yards, 0 TD, 5 INT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Canadian_Patriot 
 Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 8701 Location: Halifax
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
They all have different skill sets. But he's becoming my fav. Definitely developing into a play maker in the backfield. _________________
Deadpulse on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
finn54 
 Joined: 06 Jan 2007 Posts: 11820
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would say no, because his pass coverage is pretty poor. He's definitely my favorite though, and he's an extremely valuable member of the defense. The amount of TFL's he racks up is staggering, and he's probably the #1 playmaker on the team. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TKOhitter8737
Joined: 23 Feb 2011 Posts: 231 Location: northeast
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Yes, He might not be good in coverage but really their LB's cant cover. Mayo agian just watches the ball go right past his head, while lookin right at the QB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nextsuperstar 
Joined: 25 Nov 2010 Posts: 1641
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I agree with Finn. Spikes is a great playmaker, but his below average coverage skills (something which this team desperately needs) make him less valuable than Mayo.
Spikes has also had five penalties called on him, which also decreases his value. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
24isthelaw
Joined: 15 Nov 2010 Posts: 5181 Location: Where the Patriots are
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TKOhitter8737 wrote: | | Yes, He might not be good in coverage but really their LB's cant cover. Mayo agian just watches the ball go right past his head, while lookin right at the QB. |
Mayo's not great in coverage but he's serviceable. Seems to have the technique down too, never fouls when he does the wrap around and deflect thing. For a linebacker who's also strong against the run, we could do far worse.
Spikes is great at what he does, and is possibly my favorite player on the team right now. But as long as he's an abject liability in space I wouldn't say he's better than Mayo. _________________
Adopt-a-Patriot: Marcus Forston - Practice squad (0 tackles, 0 sacks) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NextBigThing 
Joined: 26 Oct 2009 Posts: 15886 Location: Tuck Rule FTW
|
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It is discouraging to think that I run a significantly faster 40 than him, but I think he is. He is a beast. _________________
The King Does As He Pleases
| NFLfan511 wrote: | | NBT, I made an account here just because of you. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FakingInjuries
Joined: 06 Feb 2012 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't think there is a "best" linebacker on our team.
They are all good at different things. They all have their strengths and weaknesses.
Mayo is the best all around linebacker.
Spikes is the best at making clutch plays, big hits, and stuffs.
Hightower will probably be the best blitzing linebacker. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tzimisce 
 Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 40626 Location: Slowly coming to terms with the inevitable
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Spikes has been a liability in coverage, but his value as a run defender is so high that you have to take the bad with the good. He's probably slightly better at the old Ted Johnson 'Jack' role than Ted Johnson was. Great instincts and great strength at the POA, but he's not going to get any faster, so expecting him to cover TEs down the seam will always be a losing proposition. _________________
https://twitter.com/Zealotry_Metal |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Posts: 16193
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tzimisce wrote: | | Spikes has been a liability in coverage, but his value as a run defender is so high that you have to take the bad with the good. |
True, but today's NFL and the prevalence of spread offenses and pass-heavy attacks makes Spikes less valuable than a guy like Johnson was a decade+ ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tzimisce 
 Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 40626 Location: Slowly coming to terms with the inevitable
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mcmurtry86 wrote: | | Tzimisce wrote: | | Spikes has been a liability in coverage, but his value as a run defender is so high that you have to take the bad with the good. |
True, but today's NFL and the prevalence of spread offenses and pass-heavy attacks makes Spikes less valuable than a guy like Johnson was a decade+ ago. | He's a pretty adept blitzer, too, so that raises his value against the pass a bit. Probably best to use him sparingly so offenses can't key in on him and neutralize him on passing downs. But he's not strictly a 2-down guy. _________________
https://twitter.com/Zealotry_Metal |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
24isthelaw
Joined: 15 Nov 2010 Posts: 5181 Location: Where the Patriots are
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tzimisce wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | Tzimisce wrote: | | Spikes has been a liability in coverage, but his value as a run defender is so high that you have to take the bad with the good. |
True, but today's NFL and the prevalence of spread offenses and pass-heavy attacks makes Spikes less valuable than a guy like Johnson was a decade+ ago. | He's a pretty adept blitzer, too, so that raises his value against the pass a bit. Probably best to use him sparingly so offenses can't key in on him and neutralize him on passing downs. But he's not strictly a 2-down guy. |
Its too bad, because his instincts in coverage are tremendous. If his legs would allow him to cover to his natural ability, I don't know if I'd take a single inside linebacker in the NFL over him. _________________
Adopt-a-Patriot: Marcus Forston - Practice squad (0 tackles, 0 sacks) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TomRalph 
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 Posts: 5816 Location: Leeds, England
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
As my AAP I am very proud of Spikes and his all-around game has been one of the few bright spots on the D.
Check out his stats in my sig  _________________
| Jmacz008 (With the 32nd Pick of the 2014 NFL Draft) wrote: | | ...the New England Rutgers select, Rutgers Rutgers, Rutgers from Rutgers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FakingInjuries
Joined: 06 Feb 2012 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Spikes may not technically be the "best" Linebacker on our team....
But I think he is the most IMPORTANT linebacker on our team. His personality and attitude is the polar opposite of Wilfork and Mayo. Spikes is fiery, energetic, vocal.
He's an intimidator who won't get pushed around or bullied. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
_Oypus
Joined: 30 Apr 2012 Posts: 201
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| You say that like Mayo or Wilfork would let themselves get "pushed around and bullied". Assuming you mean on the field, I can't remember the last time Wilfork was invisible for a game. He's always doing something. Mayo too, maybe less so though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|