| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4169
Location: CA-TX
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:38 pm Post subject: Raiders vs. Falcons Week 6 GDT |
 |
|
|
OAKLAND
1-3
@
5-0
Game Time:
Sunday October 14, 1:00pm ET - CBS
Injury Report:
Raiders
Did not participate:
T Khalif Barnes (groin)
TE Richard Gordon (hamstring)
CB Shawntae Spencer (foot)
Limited participation:
K Sebastian Janikowski (left groin)
DT Tommy Kelly (foot)
DT Richard Seymour (knee)
Full participation:
TE David Ausberry (shoulder)
WR Darrius Heyward-Bey (concussion)
RB Taiwan Jones (shoulder)
RB Darren McFadden (shoulder)
TE Brandon Myers (shoulder)
OL Alex Parsons (shoulder)
Falcons
Did not participate:
TE - Michael Palmer (shoulder)
RB - Antone Smith (hamstring)
Limited participation:
DT - Jonathan Babineaux (groin)
DT - Jerry Peria (thigh)
C - Todd McClure (pectoral)
S - William Moore (hip)
LB - Stephen Nicholas (ankle)
OG - Garrett Reynolds (back)
Full participation:
WR - Kevin Cone (knee)
WR - Drew Davis (knee)
CB - Dunta Robinson (shoulder)
Key Battles:
Run offense: With the Raiders having an extra week to prepare coming off their bye week, could this be the game the rushing attack gets going, or will it be more of the same? The Falcons run defense ranks 27th in yards per game (142), and 31st on yards per carry (5.4), so they've been struggling.
Pass defense: The Raiders pass defense has been getting torched this season. With Huff and Lee still starting at CB, expect more of the same going up against the red hot Falcons passing attack, lead by early MVP candidate Matt Ryan. Tony Gonzalez is on pace for over 1,200 yards and 13 TD's. Branch needs to bring his A game or he'll get picked on.
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders  |
Last edited by Darkness on Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:53 pm; edited 6 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12585
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:09 pm Post subject: Re: Falcons Run D: 142 YPG (27th), 5.4 YPC (31st) |
|
|
|
| Darkness wrote: | | With the Raiders having an extra week to prepare coming off their bye week, could this be the game the rushing attack gets going, or will it be more of the same? |
game thread or bye week stuff thread?
is anyone going to make a game thread
nobody cares anymore lol
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thelawoffices
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 12382
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The offense might be fine this week, but the defense is going to get absolutely torched. It's going to be a rough game.
_________________
| StevePerry wrote: | How old are you? 18?
This guy was dropping hits when you were in diapers.
His voice was incredible. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4169
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:02 pm Post subject: Re: Falcons Run D: 142 YPG (27th), 5.4 YPC (31st) |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | With the Raiders having an extra week to prepare coming off their bye week, could this be the game the rushing attack gets going, or will it be more of the same? |
game thread or bye week stuff thread?
is anyone going to make a game thread
nobody cares anymore lol |
lol looks that way.
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BlackPrestige92
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 2622
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The thread subject has me sad. Not because it shows how bad ATL is against the run, but because the Raiders won't gash the run D like they should. I mean, what are we 32nd in the league in rushing? Not like we have a huge favorable match up here.
Even if we CAN score points this Sunday, our Defense is due a BBQ this Sunday.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4169
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| thelawoffices wrote: | | The offense might be fine this week, but the defense is going to get absolutely torched. It's going to be a rough game. |
Yup. That puts the pressure on the Raiders offense to keep up. If they don't, they'll be forced to abandon the run game, making the offense one dimensional like it's been most of the season. We need to get McFadden going.
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12585
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:19 pm Post subject: Re: Falcons Run D: 142 YPG (27th), 5.4 YPC (31st) |
|
|
|
| Darkness wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | With the Raiders having an extra week to prepare coming off their bye week, could this be the game the rushing attack gets going, or will it be more of the same? |
game thread or bye week stuff thread?
is anyone going to make a game thread
nobody cares anymore lol |
lol looks that way. |
i vote to make this the GDT.
change the title and add some pictures and make a GDT.
as a senior member you have my permission to turn this into the GDT.
any opposition can ...........
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raiiiiidersssss
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 4117
Location: The Black Hole
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I just hope we don't get blown out at this point lol. And no injuries, of course
_________________
If the Raiders don't trade back at 3, I want Fisher, Ziggy, or Star. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12585
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Oakland's best running back is healthy for a change, but he's not producing. His 201 yards on the season have come in games where the Raiders have averaged 2.3, 1.6, 5.7 and 3.5 yards per carry, respectively. They also rank last in the NFL with 71 carries (New England's up-tempo offense, by comparison, has 191). |
dam 71 carries?
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12585
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
game time
Sun. 1:00 PM - CBS
10am for us westcoasters
| Quote: | | Raiders coaches who have combined for nine straight post-bye losses starting in 2003. The last Oakland win after a bye was in 2002 -- the year of their last AFC West title and AFC championship. |
dam we suck
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cutler06
Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 9574
Location: Westminster
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Falcon 48 Raiders 7.....................
after 3 qtrs IMO
_________________
| big_palooka wrote: | | 1. The AFC West goes right through Denver. Respect to the Broncos.2. First Denver is a pretender. They are not making the playoffs, just like the Raiders. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tacos
Joined: 13 Jan 2011
Posts: 980
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Cutler06 wrote: | Falcon 48 Raiders 7.....................
after 3 qtrs IMO |
That is our best case scenario.
Remember when we played Green Bay last year? That's how I feel this game will turn out.
We are coming off of a bye though, I just have no faith in this defense coupled with Knapp's offense.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CrashMan510
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 2715
Location: Bay Area
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
this feels like the GB game last year, loosing by less than 14 is a win in my book :facepalm:
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirtyHarry
Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 1167
Location: Foster City,CA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Cutler06 wrote: | Falcon 48 Raiders 7.....................
after 3 qtrs IMO |
Lol I'm pretty sure we will score more than 7 points but I'm anticipating Qiontorris Jones going straight HAM. And Roddy white for that matter.
_________________
| JonesDrew32 wrote: | 38-10 Chargers
This game should definitely bring some lulz from the Raiders side. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 947
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Lets see how this goes if the Raiders can get a win there is allot of winnable games coming up.
Below is from Rotoworld
Coach Dennis Allen indicated the Raiders spent a lot of time tweaking the rushing attack over the bye week.
The Raiders aren't going to overhaul the zone-blocking scheme, but they're determined to get their best player on track. The softest run defense McFadden has faced to this point has been the vaunted Steelers. This week's opponent, Atlanta, is ranked 27th in run defense, allowing 5.4 yards per carry. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
