| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| If the FO turns over but Heckert is invited to stay, does he if it means a new QB in 2013? |
| Yes |
|
33% |
[ 3 ] |
| No |
|
66% |
[ 6 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 9 |
|
| Author |
Message |
NickZambo 
Joined: 03 Mar 2009 Posts: 1388 Location: Pittsburgh Browns Backin'
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:37 am Post subject: The Weeden/Heckert Connection |
|
|
|
With the imminent Browns ownership change on the horizon, many people fear (or rejoice) that this is the end of Pat Shurmur and Mike Holmgren. I think it is fair to say that most people are happy with Tom Heckert and want the new ownership group to retain him due to the decent drafts of the past few years.
However, there is a lot of debate on this website about the Browns current Win/Loss record, the 2013 draft and the QB play. Many like the idea of the Browns getting a top tier franchise QB next year: Geno Smith, Barkley etc... While others are a looking for Weeden to be given time to develop.
Fact: Weeden was brought in under Heckert's tenure as GM.
Fact: Heckert wasn't willing to take the job in Cleveland unless he knew he had control of the decision making.
Premise: Heckert believes in Weeden and if the current front office stays as is, Weeden would remain & be the guy going into next year.
...but...
Premise: In the off season, Heckert is retained but Holmgren and Shurmur leave.
Premise: Weeden struggles, leading the Browns to a top draft pick and the new group forces him out the door, does Heckert look at new QBs or does he step down b/c of the Weeden Connection?
Frankly, I don't see Heckert sticking around if a new front office comes in with the idea of a fresh start at QB. It undermines Heckert's decision to draft Weeden and I personally don't think Heckert would be willing to cut ties with a 1st round rookie QB after only 1 season. So if the new front office forces that, I think Heckert walks.
The premise of this thread is: do you feel the success of Weeden ties directly with Tom Heckert's future with he Browns? Are you okay with a entirely new front office, new QB & no Shurmur, Holmgren & Heckert? And does Heckert mean so much to us that we will pull for Weeden's success going forward?
DEBATE
**I realize there are a lot of "IF" senarios but I think these are realistic thoughts based on the history of front office change when a new ownership group comes in, the overall record of the team, Pat Shurmur's leadership ability and the Joe Banner rumors**
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82b038e2/article/report-joe-banner-will-become-cleveland-browns-president _________________
Skipping over bruceb's posts since 2012
Last edited by NickZambo on Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:54 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DawgX 
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 Posts: 10010
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
If Heckert stays, then I'm fairly certain that Weeden will stay. If a new GM is brought in, then there's a good chance that a new QB will be brought in. _________________ Cleveland Browns Forum Hall of Fame Inductee
Kiltman on the great sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NickZambo 
Joined: 03 Mar 2009 Posts: 1388 Location: Pittsburgh Browns Backin'
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DawgX wrote: | | If Heckert stays, then I'm fairly certain that Weeden will stay. If a new GM is brought in, then there's a good chance that a new QB will be brought in. |
I agree but are the Heckert supporters who are clamoring for a new franchise QB good with that?
New QB & new GM, or same QB potentially same GM...Seems like it wont go both ways... _________________
Skipping over bruceb's posts since 2012 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Reginaldm9 
Joined: 14 Apr 2011 Posts: 1666 Location: Kent State University
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think Heckert is let go, but not before next season. I think the new ownership gives him one last year to prove his prospects much like we kept Mangini around one extra year when Holmgren came to town. I'm almost positive that Weeden sticks around for at least another year as well. We'll make a killing off an early draft pick, especially if Clowney doesn't declare. _________________
ReggieCamp on the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EL Brownso 
Joined: 14 Nov 2009 Posts: 682 Location: Alamogordo, NM
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Reginaldm9 wrote: | | I think Heckert is let go, but not before next season. I think the new ownership gives him one last year to prove his prospects much like we kept Mangini around one extra year when Holmgren came to town. I'm almost positive that Weeden sticks around for at least another year as well. We'll make a killing off an early draft pick, especially if Clowney doesn't declare. |
If you are Heckert in this situation and Weeden stays consistantly sub-par during the rest of this season. You know next season is your last chance with this team. You have an opportunity for Geno Smith (being a potential Newton/RGIII/Luck type breakout QB candidate) do you take him or do you ride the ginger out to see if he produces? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Estonianzulu 
 Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 19903 Location: Middle of Nowhere VA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
For what its worth, I believe it was Rabisson who first reported that Heckert loved Geno Smith _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Reginaldm9 
Joined: 14 Apr 2011 Posts: 1666 Location: Kent State University
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| EL Brownso wrote: | | Reginaldm9 wrote: | | I think Heckert is let go, but not before next season. I think the new ownership gives him one last year to prove his prospects much like we kept Mangini around one extra year when Holmgren came to town. I'm almost positive that Weeden sticks around for at least another year as well. We'll make a killing off an early draft pick, especially if Clowney doesn't declare. |
If you are Heckert in this situation and Weeden stays consistantly sub-par during the rest of this season. You know next season is your last chance with this team. You have an opportunity for Geno Smith (being a potential Newton/RGIII/Luck type breakout QB candidate) do you take him or do you ride the ginger out to see if he produces? |
Bailing on a first round pick would pretty much signal the end of our crafty GM. I think if he's still around it's ride or die with Weeden. _________________
ReggieCamp on the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drew_Carey 
Joined: 10 Mar 2012 Posts: 1478 Location: Seattle - Cleveland
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
heckert will stay if he is offered the opportunity....
regardless if the new owner, him, new coach, etc. want Weeden back or not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fsubrowns9510 
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 12533 Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Oh to be a fly on the wall in Berea...
I really have no idea. That's the tough thing here. I dunno if Heckert has as much control and one would think/hope. _________________
Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ditchdigger 
Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 14057 Location: Columbus, OH
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Estonianzulu wrote: | | For what its worth, I believe it was Rabisson who first reported that Heckert loved Geno Smith |
Yes it was. As a 2nd round pick to develop behind Weeden.
That would be somewhat reasonable, that is if we actually had a 2nd round pick. 1st overall, not so much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|