| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| NFL's Best Defense? |
| Seattle Seahawks |
|
15% |
[ 13 ] |
| Houston Texans |
|
15% |
[ 13 ] |
| San Francisco 49ers |
|
61% |
[ 52 ] |
| Other |
|
8% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 85 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Hieroglyphics
Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Posts: 543
Location: University of North Texas
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:24 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Elite
San Francisco 49ers
Houston Texans
Great
Bears
Cardinals - Albeit very raw
Very Good
Seahawks
Vikings
Eagles |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Falastine
Joined: 02 Sep 2008
Posts: 3448
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Hieroglyphics wrote: | Elite
San Francisco 49ers
Houston Texans
Great
Bears
Cardinals - Albeit very raw
Very Good
Seahawks
Vikings
Eagles |
6 of the 7 teams you listed are NFC teams. Pretty interesting.
Kinda weird not seeing at least one of the Steelers or Ravens on a list like this.
_________________
IN THE BAY AREA WE SMOKE PHILLIES |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
J-ALL-DAY
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 16104
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| khodder wrote: | One thing to Note; The Buffalo Bills this season in terms of points scored;
28 vs Jets
35 vs KC
24 vs CLE
28 vs NE
That is, through four weeks, 28.75 PPG.
They then came out this vs vs the 49ers and put up three points, three.
That 49ers defense has also held a pair of hihgly explosive offenses in the Packers and Lions to 22 and 19 points respectively. When you combine that with what they did last year and I have to put SF up the top still.
With the Texans you had a rookie in his first ever start so you are going to get a guy who is very nervous and not producting his best football (Seen it first hand, Arizona has played a rookie in week one each of the last three seasons), though the D did pretty well vs the Phins. They only really established QB they have faced in Peyton Manning they gave up 23 points and that included 89 and 80 yard touchdown drives.
I still like Arizona on the same level as Seattle and Chicago on a tier just below the Texans and 49ers, but whatever they decided to do over their past two games they need to stop and go back to what worked in weeks 1-3. They started giving up big plays all over the place (44 yards to Amendola, 51 yards to Givens, 80 yards to Hartline (Blown Coverage), 57 yards to Hartline)
But before they they had dealt well with both the Patriots and the Eagles offensively.
Best defense in the league, I would not hestiate to go with the 49ers, behind them is a bit of a mixer that involves a good few teams. |
And GB had a punt return for a TD so they only scored two TDs against the Niners.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 32813
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll give you my verdict after we play San Fran. Came away from Arizona and Seattle feeling that both were still very good to great defenses but weren't as stout as Chicago's D.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
49ers Finest
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 5724
Location: San Jose
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Falastine wrote: | | Hieroglyphics wrote: | Elite
San Francisco 49ers
Houston Texans
Great
Bears
Cardinals - Albeit very raw
Very Good
Seahawks
Vikings
Eagles |
6 of the 7 teams you listed are NFC teams. Pretty interesting.
Kinda weird not seeing at least one of the Steelers or Ravens on a list like this. |
Good list.
Also 3/4 of the NFC west are listed.
I went with my 9ers. Can't wait to play ny and ne
_________________
***WE RUN THE WEST!***
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chpjns15
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 1568
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Hieroglyphics wrote: | Elite
San Francisco 49ers
Houston Texans
Great
Bears
Cardinals - Albeit very raw
Very Good
Seahawks
Vikings
Eagles |
My probably a little bi biased list goes:
Elite:
Seahawks
49ers
Texans
Great:
Bears
Cardinals
Very good:
Ravens
Eagles
Vikings
Steelers
(that was in order)
_________________
"Trying is the first step towards failure"
"If you can't win, cheat. If you can't cheat, don't play."
"Getting a paper cut, that is tragedy. Someone falling down a sewer and dying, that is comedy." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 19319
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BlaqOptic wrote: | | I honestly think Philly is pretty damn good. Aside from Jackson and McCoy their entire offense sucks and puts them in bad spots yet they play good games. Got away with some DPI/DH calls today but still stifled the Steelers. I've yet to see an offense they haven't handled thus far this season. |
I couldn't imagine what this defense would look like or have produced the last 5 games had the offense not turned the ball over 13x?  I mean for as much praise people are throwing SF, Hou, (rightfully so), Sea, Chi, AZ, etc.... I wonder what they would have done if placed in the same circumstance? It's a shame really that the Eagles offense and defense can't seem to be able to play well at the same time. It's always a Either or with them. What thye are doing after constantly being handcuffed by TO is actually pretty amazing.
_________________
Bird Watch: LeSean McCoy
GM. 12^ Att. 200^ Avg. 4.2^ Rush yds 840^ TD 2}{Rec 54^ Rec yds 373^ TD 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 32813
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| chpjns15 wrote: | | Hieroglyphics wrote: | Elite
San Francisco 49ers
Houston Texans
Great
Bears
Cardinals - Albeit very raw
Very Good
Seahawks
Vikings
Eagles |
My probably a little bi biased list goes:
Elite:
Seahawks
49ers
Texans
Great:
Bears
Cardinals
Very good:
Ravens
Eagles
Vikings
Steelers
(that was in order) |
No respect at all for the Rams?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DetroitSpirit
Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3077
Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | chpjns15 wrote: | | Hieroglyphics wrote: | Elite
San Francisco 49ers
Houston Texans
Great
Bears
Cardinals - Albeit very raw
Very Good
Seahawks
Vikings
Eagles |
My probably a little bi biased list goes:
Elite:
Seahawks
49ers
Texans
Great:
Bears
Cardinals
Very good:
Ravens
Eagles
Vikings
Steelers
(that was in order) |
No respect at all for the Rams? |
They're good, just not very good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 32813
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DetroitSpirit wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | chpjns15 wrote: | | Hieroglyphics wrote: | Elite
San Francisco 49ers
Houston Texans
Great
Bears
Cardinals - Albeit very raw
Very Good
Seahawks
Vikings
Eagles |
My probably a little bi biased list goes:
Elite:
Seahawks
49ers
Texans
Great:
Bears
Cardinals
Very good:
Ravens
Eagles
Vikings
Steelers
(that was in order) |
No respect at all for the Rams? |
They're good, just not very good. |
They haven't given up a passing TD since week 2 and have given up a total of 2 all season. They have held Calvin Johnson, Brandon Marshall and Larry Fitzgerald all TD less.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tooki
Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 9697
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
If the Ravens (this year) are being called "Very good", I can call the Rams "very good"
_________________
| sp6488 wrote: | | If the Chiefs finish ahead of the Ravens in the standings I will eat a printed copy of the standings. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 32813
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tooki wrote: | | If the Ravens (this year) are being called "Very good", I can call the Rams "very good" |
Thank you.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khodder
Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 48530
Location: New New York
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nabbs4u wrote: | | I couldn't imagine what this defense would look like or have produced the last 5 games had the offense not turned the ball over 13x? I mean for as much praise people are throwing SF, Hou, (rightfully so), Sea, Chi, AZ, etc.... I wonder what they would have done if placed in the same circumstance? It's a shame really that the Eagles offense and defense can't seem to be able to play well at the same time. It's always a Either or with them. What thye are doing after constantly being handcuffed by TO is actually pretty amazing. |
The biggest issue I have with the Eagles D is that outside of facing Weeden week one, they have struggled to create turnovers, three created in four games since.
_________________
Patrick Peterson - 92 targets, 40 catches allowed, 602 yards, 6 TD's, 7 INT's
The Big Brain am winning again, I am the Greetest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 19319
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| khodder wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | I couldn't imagine what this defense would look like or have produced the last 5 games had the offense not turned the ball over 13x? I mean for as much praise people are throwing SF, Hou, (rightfully so), Sea, Chi, AZ, etc.... I wonder what they would have done if placed in the same circumstance? It's a shame really that the Eagles offense and defense can't seem to be able to play well at the same time. It's always a Either or with them. What thye are doing after constantly being handcuffed by TO is actually pretty amazing. |
The biggest issue I have with the Eagles D is that outside of facing Weeden week one, they have struggled to create turnovers, three created in four games since. |
I can understand that and it's a valid point. However when the opposing offense usually has a short field to work with it does make it a liitle harder to get those turn overs. It's not like teams are always starting from the 20 and having to go 80 to score when the Eagles ST can't seem to tackle and or TO lead teams to start from midfield. I'm not suggesting they are the best but given the situations they have been put in numerous times by TO or ST, it's amazing what they've done if people look closer. Give any of the other Defenses mentioned 13+ TO to dig out of and our inept tackling on ST and their numbers and being scored upon would be drastically different. I will add 3 of those 4 games you mentioned were against arguably top 10 QB like Eli, Ben and Flacco. Having none against Kolb there is no excuse, I do agree.
_________________
Bird Watch: LeSean McCoy
GM. 12^ Att. 200^ Avg. 4.2^ Rush yds 840^ TD 2}{Rec 54^ Rec yds 373^ TD 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
texans_uk
Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 25444
Location: Kempes on the sig
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Khodder what was the score heading into the fourth quarter of the Broncos vs Texans game?
_________________
| DallasInHeart wrote: | | Buddy if you lived in Europe or ever gone to visit Europe you would know that over there Football is totally on a different level |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
