| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
B-More_2011
Joined: 28 Jan 2010
Posts: 1281
Location: O.C. (MD)
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 5:52 pm Post subject: 2012 MLB Playoff Projections |
 |
|
|
Welp, here it goes. It's October again and it's been another crazy season in major league baseball. I'll save the rant for discussion, so here's my projections:
AL Wild Card Game:
Baltimore defeats Oakland (faces Texas in ALDS)
NL Wild Card Game:
Atlanta defeats St. Louis (faces Washington in ALDS)
ALDS:
Yankees defeat Tigers (3-1)
Baltimore defeats Texas (3-2)
NLDS:
Cincinnati defeats San Francisco (3-2)
Washington defeats Atlanta (3-1)
ALCS:
Baltimore defeats New York (4-2)
Cincinnati defeats Washignton (4-2)
World Series:
Baltimore defeats Cincinnati (4-3)
Baltimore defeats the Reds in the 11th inning by 1 run. Greatest world series of all-time. (last part was a troll but I still stand behind the orioles to win the whole thing)
Feel free to post your projections and make fun of mine. 
Here's to a great October!
_________________
| Buccaneers wrote: | | KCDiehard88 wrote: | | Where are the Chiefs at #11? |
Nobody cares about the Chiefs. |
 <----- I made dis |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nbaker1933
Joined: 31 May 2011
Posts: 2074
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I'd at least wait until you know who is playing who(whom?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WakaKoalaFlame
Joined: 10 Feb 2011
Posts: 547
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rangers lose in WC vs Baltimore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UofMfan909
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 32430
Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Today:
Oakland over Texas
Baltimore over Tampa
NYY over Boston
AL
1. Yankees
2. A's
3. Tigers
WC. Rangers/Orioles
NL
1. Nationals
2. Reds
3. Giants
WC. Braves/Cards
Texas over Baltimore
Atlanta over St Louis
Texas over New York
Detroit over Oakland
Washington over San Francisco
Cincinnati over Atlanta
Detroit over Texas
Cincinnati over Washington
Detroit over Cincinnati
MVP - Delmon Young!!!!!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 47615
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| UofMfan909 wrote: | Today:
Oakland over Texas
Baltimore over Tampa
NYY over Boston
AL
1. Yankees
2. A's
3. Tigers
WC. Rangers/Orioles
NL
1. Nationals
2. Reds
3. Giants
WC. Braves/Cards
Texas over Baltimore
Atlanta over St Louis
Texas over New York
Detroit over Oakland
Washington over San Francisco
Cincinnati over Atlanta
Detroit over Texas
Cincinnati over Washington
Detroit over Cincinnati
MVP - Delmon Young!!!!! |
Ew. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manny/Patrick
Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 2176
Location: Daly City, CA
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I dont understand how we (SF) are playing the reds the first round? I thought the wildcard cannot play someone from the same division in the first round.
_________________
Posted September 12th, 2012
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | so it looks like a Ravens 49ers Super Bowl is inevitable, with the Ravens winning it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
B-More_2011
Joined: 28 Jan 2010
Posts: 1281
Location: O.C. (MD)
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Manny/Patrick wrote: | | I dont understand how we (SF) are playing the reds the first round? I thought the wildcard cannot play someone from the same division in the first round. |
Huh? The giants and reds both won their divisions and the nationals clinched home-field... I don't see how you're confused. Unlike the AL, the NL picture is all but set depending on the outcome of the wild card game. The AL is just a mess.
_________________
| Buccaneers wrote: | | KCDiehard88 wrote: | | Where are the Chiefs at #11? |
Nobody cares about the Chiefs. |
<----- I made dis |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UofMfan909
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 32430
Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| B-More_2011 wrote: | | Manny/Patrick wrote: | | I dont understand how we (SF) are playing the reds the first round? I thought the wildcard cannot play someone from the same division in the first round. |
Huh? The giants and reds both won their divisions and the nationals clinched home-field... I don't see how you're confused. Unlike the AL, the NL picture is all but set depending on the outcome of the wild card game. The AL is just a mess. |
Unless the rule changed, Washington can't play Atlanta in the NLDS because they're in the same division. That's what he's saying (I think)
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 47615
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| B-More_2011 wrote: | | Manny/Patrick wrote: | | I dont understand how we (SF) are playing the reds the first round? I thought the wildcard cannot play someone from the same division in the first round. |
Huh? The giants and reds both won their divisions and the nationals clinched home-field... I don't see how you're confused. Unlike the AL, the NL picture is all but set depending on the outcome of the wild card game. The AL is just a mess. |
Don't know if it still stands with all the changes, but there is a rule that two teams in the same division can't play each other in the first round. You have the Braves and Nationals facing each other. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manny/Patrick
Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 2176
Location: Daly City, CA
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| B-More_2011 wrote: | | Manny/Patrick wrote: | | I dont understand how we (SF) are playing the reds the first round? I thought the wildcard cannot play someone from the same division in the first round. |
Huh? The giants and reds both won their divisions and the nationals clinched home-field... I don't see how you're confused. Unlike the AL, the NL picture is all but set depending on the outcome of the wild card game. The AL is just a mess. |
In previous years the wildcard cannot play someone from the same division in the first round. In 2010 Atlanta won the WC and philly had HFA and they didnt play the first round
_________________
Posted September 12th, 2012
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | so it looks like a Ravens 49ers Super Bowl is inevitable, with the Ravens winning it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
B-More_2011
Joined: 28 Jan 2010
Posts: 1281
Location: O.C. (MD)
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| UofMfan909 wrote: | | B-More_2011 wrote: | | Manny/Patrick wrote: | | I dont understand how we (SF) are playing the reds the first round? I thought the wildcard cannot play someone from the same division in the first round. |
Huh? The giants and reds both won their divisions and the nationals clinched home-field... I don't see how you're confused. Unlike the AL, the NL picture is all but set depending on the outcome of the wild card game. The AL is just a mess. |
Unless the rule changed, Washington can't play Atlanta in the NLDS because they're in the same division. That's what he's saying (I think) |
It said on ESPN that the Reds and Giants will play each other in the NLDS. Clearly there's been a rule change.
_________________
| Buccaneers wrote: | | KCDiehard88 wrote: | | Where are the Chiefs at #11? |
Nobody cares about the Chiefs. |
<----- I made dis |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UofMfan909
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 32430
Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| B-More_2011 wrote: | | UofMfan909 wrote: | | B-More_2011 wrote: | | Manny/Patrick wrote: | | I dont understand how we (SF) are playing the reds the first round? I thought the wildcard cannot play someone from the same division in the first round. |
Huh? The giants and reds both won their divisions and the nationals clinched home-field... I don't see how you're confused. Unlike the AL, the NL picture is all but set depending on the outcome of the wild card game. The AL is just a mess. |
Unless the rule changed, Washington can't play Atlanta in the NLDS because they're in the same division. That's what he's saying (I think) |
It said on ESPN that the Reds and Giants will play each other in the NLDS. Clearly there's been a rule change. |
| Quote: | | A revised playoff system will be utilized beginning with the 2012 season, which will add a second wild card team for each league. The two wild card teams in each league will play a one game playoff to advance. The winner of this game will automatically face the number 1 seed in the league in the Division Series, regardless of whether or not they are in the same division. Due to scheduling conflicts, the 2012 Division Series will have the lower seed hosting the first two games, while the higher seed will host the next three games. For 2013 and beyond, the Division Series will return to the 2-2-1 format previously used. |
yeah, you're right. Rules changed.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Manny/Patrick
Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 2176
Location: Daly City, CA
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
My Man, Thank you
_________________
Posted September 12th, 2012
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | so it looks like a Ravens 49ers Super Bowl is inevitable, with the Ravens winning it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManeLine
Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Posts: 5448
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| UofMfan909 wrote: | Today:
Oakland over Texas
Baltimore over Tampa
NYY over Boston
AL
1. Yankees
2. A's
3. Tigers
WC. Rangers/Orioles
NL
1. Nationals
2. Reds
3. Giants
WC. Braves/Cards
Texas over Baltimore
Atlanta over St Louis
Texas over New York
Detroit over Oakland
Washington over San Francisco
Cincinnati over Atlanta
Detroit over Texas
Cincinnati over Washington
Detroit over Cincinnati
MVP - Delmon Young!!!!! |
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Typical_Lions
Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 3161
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Haha Delmon. It's so crazy it might just work! I love that guy's voice. Reminds me of Eddie Murphy's white guy voice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
