| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39328
Location: Montana
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:10 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| TheGoldenChild wrote: | | buno67 wrote: | | 1King wrote: | | buno67 wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Typical_Lions wrote: | | Notre Dame is canceling the series after the 2014 game. I wonder if Michigan will try to create a new annual game or if they will shuffle it up. Would be cool to see some home and homes with teams across the country. |
What is funny is who they did not cancel with. They could have with a couple other teams the same way. Shows you who they are more afraid to face down the line IMO |
ND isn't afraid to face anyone. They have faced some tough schedules in past years. Like this year, face MSU Michigan, Miami, Stanford, Oklahoma, Pitt, BC, and USC. That's pretty damn tough. They go undefeated they will play for the national championship!
What teams are you complaining about keeping? They will keep Stanford and USC so they can play on the WCO yearly also USC is a great rivalry (1926) Navy will always be kept cause its a Great rivalry (1914)
Purdue and Notre Dame has been playing since b1946
Notre Dame Michigan play in the early 1900s but stop and re picked up the match up in 1978 and had a couple seasons here or there where they didn't play
So Notre Dame is keeping its more important rivalry games and creating space for its new ACC line up. Don't be thumpin ur chest like Notre Dame is afraid to face Michigan |
You list Pitt and BC like they are actually good teams. 
Anyone that goes undefeated will play for a national championship provided you have even a decent schedule.
Michigan-ND > Purdue-ND
They opted out of the contract and instead of scheduling us, they are now playing NW and some scrub ACC teams. You can draw your own conclusions, but given the facts, saying "ND is scared of Michigan" isn't completely off the wall (though it isn't the whole story). |
im just saying when Pitt and BC are considered the easy games on ur schedule you have one hell of a schedule.
Purdue-ND is a bigger rivalry than Michigan ND IMO. Its their big inner state game. Purdue ND is your MSU-UM. ND has to keep Purdue, they dont have to keep Michigan.
Well they have to have the Scrub ACC teams because of their stupid little deal |
This is just absurd. When Notre Dame is elite, they put a yearly drubbing on Purdue, as evidenced when Holtz went 11-0 against them. In terms of importance, it's probably the fourth or fifth biggest rivalry for Notre Dame, out of their 600 annual rivalry games. |
Thank goodness someone else saw how nuts that statement was. That would be like saying UM needs to keep Central Michigan on their schedule
_________________
FFMD II AGM- DETROIT LIONS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buno67
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 24018
Location: Chubs for Chud
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| detfan782004 wrote: | | TheGoldenChild wrote: | | buno67 wrote: | | 1King wrote: | | buno67 wrote: | | detfan782004 wrote: | | Typical_Lions wrote: | | Notre Dame is canceling the series after the 2014 game. I wonder if Michigan will try to create a new annual game or if they will shuffle it up. Would be cool to see some home and homes with teams across the country. |
What is funny is who they did not cancel with. They could have with a couple other teams the same way. Shows you who they are more afraid to face down the line IMO |
ND isn't afraid to face anyone. They have faced some tough schedules in past years. Like this year, face MSU Michigan, Miami, Stanford, Oklahoma, Pitt, BC, and USC. That's pretty damn tough. They go undefeated they will play for the national championship!
What teams are you complaining about keeping? They will keep Stanford and USC so they can play on the WCO yearly also USC is a great rivalry (1926) Navy will always be kept cause its a Great rivalry (1914)
Purdue and Notre Dame has been playing since b1946
Notre Dame Michigan play in the early 1900s but stop and re picked up the match up in 1978 and had a couple seasons here or there where they didn't play
So Notre Dame is keeping its more important rivalry games and creating space for its new ACC line up. Don't be thumpin ur chest like Notre Dame is afraid to face Michigan |
You list Pitt and BC like they are actually good teams.
Anyone that goes undefeated will play for a national championship provided you have even a decent schedule.
Michigan-ND > Purdue-ND
They opted out of the contract and instead of scheduling us, they are now playing NW and some scrub ACC teams. You can draw your own conclusions, but given the facts, saying "ND is scared of Michigan" isn't completely off the wall (though it isn't the whole story). |
im just saying when Pitt and BC are considered the easy games on ur schedule you have one hell of a schedule.
Purdue-ND is a bigger rivalry than Michigan ND IMO. Its their big inner state game. Purdue ND is your MSU-UM. ND has to keep Purdue, they dont have to keep Michigan.
Well they have to have the Scrub ACC teams because of their stupid little deal |
This is just absurd. When Notre Dame is elite, they put a yearly drubbing on Purdue, as evidenced when Holtz went 11-0 against them. In terms of importance, it's probably the fourth or fifth biggest rivalry for Notre Dame, out of their 600 annual rivalry games. |
Thank goodness someone else saw how nuts that statement was. That would be like saying UM needs to keep Central Michigan on their schedule |
its not like Michigan has been playing central Michigan since since 1946 or is one of their biggest rivalries and battle for the Shillelagh Trophy. Im sorry if I think Notre Dame and Purdue is a bigger rivalry than Notre Dame Michigan. Notre Dame and Purdue have more history, in he same state. ND Purdue is MSU Michigan IMO
im sorry GoldChild's logic of why play Purdue because we beat them when were elite is dumb. Would you cancel the Navy/ND game??? nope but ND leads the all-time series 72-12-1
_________________
XBL:buno67
PSN:mcolabuno |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JETS2005
Joined: 12 Oct 2005
Posts: 3205
Location: Atlanta
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1King
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 24109
Location: MI
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | its not like Michigan has been playing central Michigan since since 1946 or is one of their biggest rivalries and battle for the Shillelagh Trophy. Im sorry if I think Notre Dame and Purdue is a bigger rivalry than Notre Dame Michigan. Notre Dame and Purdue have more history, in he same state. ND Purdue is MSU Michigan IMO
im sorry GoldChild's logic of why play Purdue because we beat them when were elite is dumb. Would you cancel the Navy/ND game??? nope but ND leads the all-time series 72-12-1 |
an actual ND fan came in and said ND-Purdue isn't that big of a rivalry and yet you think you know more?
We play Minnesota more than ND, but MICH-ND is still a bigger rivalry than MICH-MINN.
_________________
^^^^^BeastM0de23RB on the sig.
CWood21 wrote:
Alright, congratulations to 1King. He is the winner of the inaugural NBA Trade Tournament. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jvh1827
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 1063
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Can anyone give me some info on the remaining 2013 prospects we're targeting and who we may take?
2014?
_________________
Thanks to PB87 for the sig
Chargers, Clippers, Dodgers, Wolverines |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1King
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 24109
Location: MI
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jvh1827 wrote: | Can anyone give me some info on the remaining 2013 prospects we're targeting and who we may take?
2014? |
2013:
4/5* WR LaQuon (SP?) Treadwell
4/5* RB Derrick Green
4/5* DB Leon McQuay
2014:
I'll post later.
_________________
^^^^^BeastM0de23RB on the sig.
CWood21 wrote:
Alright, congratulations to 1King. He is the winner of the inaugural NBA Trade Tournament. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26499
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
This game is fun.
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39328
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Michigan defense has been amazing past couple games.
57 net yards rushing allowed today on 26 rushes.
94 on 30 last week.
3 yards or less per carry is good considering how bad run D got thrashed early in year.
Mattison is a very underrated coach. Has adjusted and it is obvious
_________________
FFMD II AGM- DETROIT LIONS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26499
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Denard ran for 235 yards. 
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39328
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | Denard ran for 235 yards. |
Yea seems like Borges waited until Big Ten play to let Denard be Denard.
_________________
FFMD II AGM- DETROIT LIONS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jvh1827
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 1063
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 1King wrote: | | jvh1827 wrote: | Can anyone give me some info on the remaining 2013 prospects we're targeting and who we may take?
2014? |
2013:
4/5* WR LaQuon (SP?) Treadwell
4/5* RB Derrick Green
4/5* DB Leon McQuay
2014:
I'll post later. |
Thanks. What're the chances we land any of the '13 guys? I've heard all sorts of things about the interest levels of Treadwell and Green in us and about our interest level in McQuay. Granted most of it is from friends, but still not sure where we stand with these three.
_________________
Thanks to PB87 for the sig
Chargers, Clippers, Dodgers, Wolverines |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1King
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 24109
Location: MI
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jvh1827 wrote: | | 1King wrote: | | jvh1827 wrote: | Can anyone give me some info on the remaining 2013 prospects we're targeting and who we may take?
2014? |
2013:
4/5* WR LaQuon (SP?) Treadwell
4/5* RB Derrick Green
4/5* DB Leon McQuay
2014:
I'll post later. |
Thanks. What're the chances we land any of the '13 guys? I've heard all sorts of things about the interest levels of Treadwell and Green in us and about our interest level in McQuay. Granted most of it is from friends, but still not sure where we stand with these three. |
No clue on Treadwell, we have as good a shot as anyone though. Also considering OU, Florida, Ole Miss, possibly a few others.
McQuay, he visits for the NW game. We are in his top 4 right now, but are probably #3 or 4, still plenty of time to move up with him though. Battling with USC (presumed leader if he has one, but are also full or close to full), Vandy, FSU, and Oregon.
Top 6 for Green, realistically top 2 or 3. Auburn and Tennessee appear to be toughest competition. Auburn is something like 1-4 now so we should hope they (and Tennessee) continue to lose. He is visiting for the MSU game. Said he will decide whenever he is ready between now and NSD. Also considering Ole Miss, VT, and Oregon.
I'll touch on 2014 some time tomorrow probably.
_________________
^^^^^BeastM0de23RB on the sig.
CWood21 wrote:
Alright, congratulations to 1King. He is the winner of the inaugural NBA Trade Tournament. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jvh1827
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 1063
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 1King wrote: | | jvh1827 wrote: | | 1King wrote: | | jvh1827 wrote: | Can anyone give me some info on the remaining 2013 prospects we're targeting and who we may take?
2014? |
2013:
4/5* WR LaQuon (SP?) Treadwell
4/5* RB Derrick Green
4/5* DB Leon McQuay
2014:
I'll post later. |
Thanks. What're the chances we land any of the '13 guys? I've heard all sorts of things about the interest levels of Treadwell and Green in us and about our interest level in McQuay. Granted most of it is from friends, but still not sure where we stand with these three. |
No clue on Treadwell, we have as good a shot as anyone though. Also considering OU, Florida, Ole Miss, possibly a few others.
McQuay, he visits for the NW game. We are in his top 4 right now, but are probably #3 or 4, still plenty of time to move up with him though. Battling with USC (presumed leader if he has one, but are also full or close to full), Vandy, FSU, and Oregon.
Top 6 for Green, realistically top 2 or 3. Auburn and Tennessee appear to be toughest competition. Auburn is something like 1-4 now so we should hope they (and Tennessee) continue to lose. He is visiting for the MSU game. Said he will decide whenever he is ready between now and NSD. Also considering Ole Miss, VT, and Oregon.
I'll touch on 2014 some time tomorrow probably. |
Appreciate it.
_________________
Thanks to PB87 for the sig
Chargers, Clippers, Dodgers, Wolverines |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bigc421
Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 2012
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| As much as it sucks to see scum bag meyer winning at the school down south we are sittin pretty to win the division. If this defense can continue to play at this level and alow denard and borges to manage games and not feel the need to press things i really think this team can run the table and play in a rose bowl |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bbllstr22
Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 6349
Location: Hell. The only place where the devil's advocate can reside.
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
In response to the back up quarterback's tweet a few days ago from Ohio...
http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3r8tid/
_________________
Reggie Wayne for HOF
Career---------968 receptions (10th), 13063 yards (14th), 78 TDs (24th)
Playoffs--------92 receptions (2nd), 1242 yards (4th), 9 TDs (7th) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
