| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mesa_Titan
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 48585
Location: Kiltman on the sig!!!
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 1:12 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | thelawoffices wrote: | | Mesa_Titan wrote: | | He still can't hit a curve ball, though. |
Real life Pedro Cerrano? |
Oliver Perez = Wild Thing? |
Wild thing was a righty, and threw 100 MPH
More Stephen Pryor. 
_________________
| FootballPhreak wrote: | | Stanton is garbage |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thelawoffices
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 12379
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Millwood is definitely Eddie Harris.
_________________
| StevePerry wrote: | How old are you? 18?
This guy was dropping hits when you were in diapers.
His voice was incredible. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mesa_Titan
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 48585
Location: Kiltman on the sig!!!
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| thelawoffices wrote: | | Millwood is definitely Eddie Harris. |
We have no Dorn, though. 
_________________
| FootballPhreak wrote: | | Stanton is garbage |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mesa_Titan
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 48585
Location: Kiltman on the sig!!!
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Damn.
I wanted Smoak to get a chance.
_________________
| FootballPhreak wrote: | | Stanton is garbage |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hawkman98272
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 17407
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
With 5 games left and 3 games out of the protected picks, there is little chance we'll be in the top 10 and get a protected pick.
So how much can we not give to a player to not give up our first round pick?
_________________
^^^^^^^^Kempes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29441
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| hawkman98272 wrote: | | So how much can we not give to a player to not give up our first round pick? |
| Quote: | | Teams must forfeit a draft pick to sign a free agent who declined a qualifying offer from his former club. |
I'd rather sign more low end guys then give up pick 11/12. While I think the Mariners are trending up, we're not close enough to be giving up high draft picks for free agents. Test the trade market, or sign players to low risk/high reward deals. (Melky Cabrera?)
The Pirates comp pick counting towards the 10 protected picks makes no sense to me at all. Should be the 10 worst teams that get their picks protected. 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26304
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Eagles27 wrote: | | The Pirates comp pick counting towards the 10 protected picks makes no sense to me at all. Should be the 10 worst teams that get their picks protected. |
Are you sure that they do? I assumed it was just a mistake by MLBTR.
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29441
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | Eagles27 wrote: | | The Pirates comp pick counting towards the 10 protected picks makes no sense to me at all. Should be the 10 worst teams that get their picks protected. |
Are you sure that they do? I assumed it was just a mistake by MLBTR. |
Doesn't seem like a mistake. They said that the MLB confirmed it.
So either the Mets/Mariners are getting screwed out of the option of signing a type A & having a first round pick.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26304
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Eagles27 wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | Eagles27 wrote: | | The Pirates comp pick counting towards the 10 protected picks makes no sense to me at all. Should be the 10 worst teams that get their picks protected. |
Are you sure that they do? I assumed it was just a mistake by MLBTR. |
Doesn't seem like a mistake. They said that the MLB confirmed it.
So either the Mets/Mariners are getting screwed out of the option of signing a type A & having a first round pick. |
As it stands now, both teams are getting screwed. The Royals have the 10th pick.
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29441
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | Eagles27 wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | Eagles27 wrote: | | The Pirates comp pick counting towards the 10 protected picks makes no sense to me at all. Should be the 10 worst teams that get their picks protected. |
Are you sure that they do? I assumed it was just a mistake by MLBTR. |
Doesn't seem like a mistake. They said that the MLB confirmed it.
So either the Mets/Mariners are getting screwed out of the option of signing a type A & having a first round pick. |
As it stands now, both teams are getting screwed. The Royals have the 10th pick. |
Right, that's what I meant to say.
Anyways, I can't believe teams can get screwed because of another teams failure to sign their pick...
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29441
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | Assistant editor Conor Glassey sorted of the players in our ongoing minor league Top 20 Prospects series by their current organization. There were 289 unique players (31 guys appeared on multiple lists), and here's how they break down by team:
14 Cardinals, Mariners, Padres, Pirates, Red Sox
13 Blue Jays, Cubs, Rangers, Rays
12 Mets, Rockies, Royals
11 Braves, Reds
10 Astros, Diamondbacks
9 Athletics, Phillies
8 Indians, Marlins, Tigers
7 Twins
6 White Sox
5 Angels, Brewers, Dodgers, Giants, Nationals, Yankees
4 Orioles
That chart correlates well with organization depth in most cases, though bear in mind that no distinction is draw between prospects in Triple-A vs. Rookie ball. I haven't tried to think through updated farm-system rankings—that's a project for the 2013 Prospect Handbook in December—but off the top of my head, the Rangers and Blue Jays would top that list. |
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mesa_Titan
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 48585
Location: Kiltman on the sig!!!
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Eagles27 wrote: | | Quote: | Assistant editor Conor Glassey sorted of the players in our ongoing minor league Top 20 Prospects series by their current organization. There were 289 unique players (31 guys appeared on multiple lists), and here's how they break down by team:
14 Cardinals, Mariners, Padres, Pirates, Red Sox
13 Blue Jays, Cubs, Rangers, Rays
12 Mets, Rockies, Royals
11 Braves, Reds
10 Astros, Diamondbacks
9 Athletics, Phillies
8 Indians, Marlins, Tigers
7 Twins
6 White Sox
5 Angels, Brewers, Dodgers, Giants, Nationals, Yankees
4 Orioles
That chart correlates well with organization depth in most cases, though bear in mind that no distinction is draw between prospects in Triple-A vs. Rookie ball. I haven't tried to think through updated farm-system rankings—that's a project for the 2013 Prospect Handbook in December—but off the top of my head, the Rangers and Blue Jays would top that list. |
|
Boss.
No clue what the RedSox are doing up there, though. They're not deep at all.
_________________
| FootballPhreak wrote: | | Stanton is garbage |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26304
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Eagles27 wrote: | | Quote: | Assistant editor Conor Glassey sorted of the players in our ongoing minor league Top 20 Prospects series by their current organization. There were 289 unique players (31 guys appeared on multiple lists), and here's how they break down by team:
14 Cardinals, Mariners, Padres, Pirates, Red Sox
13 Blue Jays, Cubs, Rangers, Rays
12 Mets, Rockies, Royals
11 Braves, Reds
10 Astros, Diamondbacks
9 Athletics, Phillies
8 Indians, Marlins, Tigers
7 Twins
6 White Sox
5 Angels, Brewers, Dodgers, Giants, Nationals, Yankees
4 Orioles
That chart correlates well with organization depth in most cases, though bear in mind that no distinction is draw between prospects in Triple-A vs. Rookie ball. I haven't tried to think through updated farm-system rankings—that's a project for the 2013 Prospect Handbook in December—but off the top of my head, the Rangers and Blue Jays would top that list. |
|
I'm not surprised the Mets are up there. Even without Matt Harvey, the pitching depth is crazy good.
I'm pretty surprised that there are so many teams that have more prospects than Toronto.
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hawkman98272
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 17407
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
New fences. http://atmlb.com/SZWYoq
Sorry if that's the mobile only link, but the power alley in LF is being moved in by 17 feet, while most other areas are only 4 feet.
Definitely seeing a trade of Vargas now.
_________________
^^^^^^^^Kempes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles27
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 29441
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Bout time. Though the changes don't seem to be too dramatic.
Agreed on Vargas. Not starting half his games in a park that kills RH power is definitely going to hurt is effectiveness. If a team doesn't want him I think a non-tender makes sense as well. He's not worth 7-8+ million a year. If he's willing to sign an extension in the 3/18-20 million range I'd sign him, but if he wants to be paid like a #3 starter he shouldn't be here much longer.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
