| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31295
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:36 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| bearsaddict wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | bearsaddict wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | WindyCity wrote: | I like the Rams and I think that they are on the way up with Jeff Fisher.
But lets not look to far into a terrible game the Bears played against the Packers and a nice win that the Rams had. The NFL is reactionary to a fault.
The Bears are still a team talented enough to win the division and the Rams are still a work in progress.
I think this game will be more competitive than the Colts game, but it still should be a win for the Bears.
The real tipping point for the Bears is that we have 4-5 players that can sack the QB going against a weak OL and the Rams have 2 players that can sack the QB going against a weak OL. |
That's a stretch.
While I do agree that the Bears should be favored and I think they'll probably win this game(even though I'm picking the Rams), the bold is a major stretch.
We have 2 guys who are proving to be top tier pass rushers. You guys have Peppers. And I'll give you Melton as well. That's 2 vs. 2. |
I'd like a recount on this.  |
Wow, kick a guy while he's down...dirty. I'd expect that from Cortland Finnegan but not you, bearsaddict!  |
Ha ha, I kid I kid! Don't take it personally, I just thought it was funny. You guys are a team on the rise and there is no question about it. I have enjoyed all of your posts this week, and that is a whole lot more than what I can say for about 90% of the cheese brains that come into our forum. |
It's all good. I'm just messing around as well. It's been nice over here in Bear land...see you guys again in 4 years? 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23)
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 16408
Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | bearsaddict wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | bearsaddict wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | WindyCity wrote: | I like the Rams and I think that they are on the way up with Jeff Fisher.
But lets not look to far into a terrible game the Bears played against the Packers and a nice win that the Rams had. The NFL is reactionary to a fault.
The Bears are still a team talented enough to win the division and the Rams are still a work in progress.
I think this game will be more competitive than the Colts game, but it still should be a win for the Bears.
The real tipping point for the Bears is that we have 4-5 players that can sack the QB going against a weak OL and the Rams have 2 players that can sack the QB going against a weak OL. |
That's a stretch.
While I do agree that the Bears should be favored and I think they'll probably win this game(even though I'm picking the Rams), the bold is a major stretch.
We have 2 guys who are proving to be top tier pass rushers. You guys have Peppers. And I'll give you Melton as well. That's 2 vs. 2. |
I'd like a recount on this. |
Wow, kick a guy while he's down...dirty. I'd expect that from Cortland Finnegan but not you, bearsaddict! |
Ha ha, I kid I kid! Don't take it personally, I just thought it was funny. You guys are a team on the rise and there is no question about it. I have enjoyed all of your posts this week, and that is a whole lot more than what I can say for about 90% of the cheese brains that come into our forum. |
It's all good. I'm just messing around as well. It's been nice over here in Bear land...see you guys again in 4 years? |
Don't lie, you'll be in here all the time, keeping an eye on Alshon.
_________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bowler1215
Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Posts: 5174
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Another solid game by our D. 6 sacks, 5 by D-linemen. Lots of pressure on Bradford, 2 ints, and Major Wrights pick 6 to seal the game for us. Very stupid for Peppers to push the guy though. I guess we didnt learn anything from the GB game when Carimi did the same thing.
Offense was better(it couldnt have been worse than the GB game) At least we had shorter passes, screens, etc. O-line was better, but it still needs improving. Seems like later on in the year, our o-line looks good after a shaky first half of the year. OT/OG is still our number 1 need.
_________________
Adopt a Bear:
Devin Hester |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
El ramster
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 24220
Location: Sam Bradfords Bed!
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
My fears came true..
Our DE's are just too talented
to come away with 2 sacks. Just far too talented.
We always seem to do bad vs teams who have a
woeful Oline. Always, for some odd reason..
Good luck the rest of the ways guys. Made
Sammys stats go down.
_________________
| Dus10 wrote: | | Note to self: Do not lose a sig bet to Rammy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tikitiger
Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 3716
Location: Beijing, China
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Any update on Forte's status for week 4?
_________________
tikitiger77.deviantart.com
#10 South Carolina Gamecocks 10-2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TytybearsFan21
Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Posts: 13617
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| tikitiger wrote: | | Any update on Forte's status for week 4? |
He has a high ankle sprain, which means hes out 4-6 weeks i believe. I wouldn't start him in fantasy football. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pigsooie5
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3058
Location: LOBO NATION, New Mexico
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TytybearsFan21 wrote: | | tikitiger wrote: | | Any update on Forte's status for week 4? |
He has a high ankle sprain, which means hes out 4-6 weeks i believe. I wouldn't start him in fantasy football. |
No. He Doesn't have a high ankle sprain... But we should no more as the week progresses. I fully expect Forte to be out there against the Boys on MNF.
_________________
| WindyCity wrote: | | I was actually driving Nick Fairley and Mikel Leshoure to their NA meetings when Suh side swipped our car and threatened us. |
IN EMERY, WE TRUST |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
raq11
Joined: 24 Feb 2011
Posts: 670
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TytybearsFan21 wrote: | | tikitiger wrote: | | Any update on Forte's status for week 4? |
He has a high ankle sprain, which means hes out 4-6 weeks i believe. I wouldn't start him in fantasy football. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pigsooie5
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3058
Location: LOBO NATION, New Mexico
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| raq11 wrote: | | TytybearsFan21 wrote: | | tikitiger wrote: | | Any update on Forte's status for week 4? |
He has a high ankle sprain, which means hes out 4-6 weeks i believe. I wouldn't start him in fantasy football. |
|
Shefter's initial report was wrong... Forte does not have a high ankle sprain, and should return this week against the Cowboys.
_________________
| WindyCity wrote: | | I was actually driving Nick Fairley and Mikel Leshoure to their NA meetings when Suh side swipped our car and threatened us. |
IN EMERY, WE TRUST |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TytybearsFan21
Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Posts: 13617
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| pigsooie5 wrote: | | raq11 wrote: | | TytybearsFan21 wrote: | | tikitiger wrote: | | Any update on Forte's status for week 4? |
He has a high ankle sprain, which means hes out 4-6 weeks i believe. I wouldn't start him in fantasy football. |
|
Shefter's initial report was wrong... Forte does not have a high ankle sprain, and should return this week against the Cowboys. |
Come at me bro |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pigsooie5
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3058
Location: LOBO NATION, New Mexico
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TytybearsFan21 wrote: | | pigsooie5 wrote: | | raq11 wrote: | | TytybearsFan21 wrote: | | tikitiger wrote: | | Any update on Forte's status for week 4? |
He has a high ankle sprain, which means hes out 4-6 weeks i believe. I wouldn't start him in fantasy football. |
|
Shefter's initial report was wrong... Forte does not have a high ankle sprain, and should return this week against the Cowboys. |
Come at me bro |
I'll come at you all day tyty 
_________________
| WindyCity wrote: | | I was actually driving Nick Fairley and Mikel Leshoure to their NA meetings when Suh side swipped our car and threatened us. |
IN EMERY, WE TRUST |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TytybearsFan21
Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Posts: 13617
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| pigsooie5 wrote: | | TytybearsFan21 wrote: | | pigsooie5 wrote: | | raq11 wrote: | | TytybearsFan21 wrote: | | tikitiger wrote: | | Any update on Forte's status for week 4? |
He has a high ankle sprain, which means hes out 4-6 weeks i believe. I wouldn't start him in fantasy football. |
|
Shefter's initial report was wrong... Forte does not have a high ankle sprain, and should return this week against the Cowboys. |
Come at me bro |
I'll come at you all day tyty |
I'm only allowed one serious/helpful post a year and YOU RUINED IT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ChicagoAl
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 7060
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Madmike90 wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | raq11 wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | Any chance the Bears can win the Division pretty much disappeared Thursday night. |
Minor overreaction |
I have been watching this team for more than 4 decades. I have seen this before. We would have to have Mike Ditka as coach to make up the loss to GB. They are not going to lose more than three or four more games max and we are probably going to finish right around 9 wins. I hope like heck I am wrong and Smith is a genius who has been hiding his brilliance. |
No you have been watching this team for 2 games...and guess what to make up for the loss against GB all we have to do is beat them at home...and if the offence can do anything and the D is still playing as well we will. |
The Bears team is much more than the latest variation.
Sure we can beat GB at home but who honestly believes that will happen? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Madmike90
Joined: 25 Jan 2009
Posts: 18563
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ChicagoAl wrote: | | Madmike90 wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | raq11 wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | Any chance the Bears can win the Division pretty much disappeared Thursday night. |
Minor overreaction |
I have been watching this team for more than 4 decades. I have seen this before. We would have to have Mike Ditka as coach to make up the loss to GB. They are not going to lose more than three or four more games max and we are probably going to finish right around 9 wins. I hope like heck I am wrong and Smith is a genius who has been hiding his brilliance. |
No you have been watching this team for 2 games...and guess what to make up for the loss against GB all we have to do is beat them at home...and if the offence can do anything and the D is still playing as well we will. |
The Bears team is much more than the latest variation.
Sure we can beat GB at home but who honestly believes that will happen? |
If the offence picks up and the D is still playing as well as it is right now we will beat the Packers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ChicagoAl
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 7060
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AZBearsFan wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | raq11 wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | Any chance the Bears can win the Division pretty much disappeared Thursday night. |
Minor overreaction |
I have been watching this team for more than 4 decades. I have seen this before. We would have to have Mike Ditka as coach to make up the loss to GB. They are not going to lose more than three or four more games max and we are probably going to finish right around 9 wins. I hope like heck I am wrong and Smith is a genius who has been hiding his brilliance. |
Isn't it entirely possible that we lost a game last week to a better team on their field? That team was 15-1 last year ya know. Last week was frustrating but with the reaction you'd think we lost 31-3 at home to a CFL team last week.
But regardless, let's move on to this week's game. GB was a week ago now. |
It isn't just that we lost a game to GB which I predicted but that the way it was lost was so unnecessary. If we had come out running and still gotten beat, I would not have been as upset. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
