Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Bradford-Givens Deep Ball
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> St. Louis Rams
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kgarrett12486


Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 9993
Location: Busch III
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Special Teamer wrote:
Bradford can set up the plays and that's great and all... but he under threw him. I guess it's something to be excited about but he needs to complete the entire play.


The ball hit Givens in the hands and went through. It was a catchable ball. The play should have been completed by Givens...
_________________

IDOG_det on the sig...
RIP "El Fenomeno" - Oscar Taveras
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jonezy


Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 3193
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sam played a really good game, I'm very happy. Only play I want back is the Jax dump off when he had Lancealot.
_________________

^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
[quote="norcalraider510"]
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
D9-EM


Joined: 06 Mar 2011
Posts: 705
Location: St. Louis, MO
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the insight jrry32. I was pretty ticked at Bradford watching this live so its definitely appreciated. Hopefully you can keep this sort of thing coming whenever you notice it.

Special Teamer, I noticed the UCF logo on your sig. My wife is dragging down to Florida next year so she can go to school there. Looks like you won't be the only Rams/UCF fan in Orlando anymore. Very Happy
_________________
Go Rams!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El ramster


Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 46748
Location: Paul George's Bed.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I saw the vid of this.. Gibson was open to the left and Jackson had about 10 yards of space.. Laughing

Sam should pump more.
_________________


mozwanted wrote:
I'm beginning to like the rg3 trade
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jrry32


Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 49586
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Special Teamer wrote:
Bradford can set up the plays and that's great and all... but he under threw him. I guess it's something to be excited about but he needs to complete the entire play.


Stafford threw the same ball which CJ caught for a 51 yard gain.

Bradford threw the ball around 57 to 58 yards without stepping into it. Had he stepped into it and hit Givens in stride, it would have likely been a 65 to 70 yard throw. Tough throw to make. He did under throw it but we really need a WR who can make a play on the ball in the air...that was why I wanted Alshon.
_________________
The LBC wrote:
Harper41 wrote:
Don't worry. Sean Payton would pass the ball in a Tornado.

But would he do it in a Sharknado?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El ramster


Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 46748
Location: Paul George's Bed.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jrry32 wrote:
Special Teamer wrote:
Bradford can set up the plays and that's great and all... but he under threw him. I guess it's something to be excited about but he needs to complete the entire play.


Stafford threw the same ball which CJ caught for a 51 yard gain.

Bradford threw the ball around 57 to 58 yards without stepping into it. Had he stepped into it and hit Givens in stride, it would have likely been a 65 to 70 yard throw. Tough throw to make. He did under throw it but we really need a WR who can make a play on the ball in the air...that was why I wanted Alshon.


Quick would have caught that. He attacks the ball with force..
Givens tried to body catch it. Reminds me of some Avery..
Man how I miss lil Donny Crying or Very sad
_________________


mozwanted wrote:
I'm beginning to like the rg3 trade
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iRaMs


Joined: 05 May 2010
Posts: 4266
Location: Teletran 1
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jrry32 wrote:
Special Teamer wrote:
Bradford can set up the plays and that's great and all... but he under threw him. I guess it's something to be excited about but he needs to complete the entire play.


Stafford threw the same ball which CJ caught for a 51 yard gain.

Bradford threw the ball around 57 to 58 yards without stepping into it. Had he stepped into it and hit Givens in stride, it would have likely been a 65 to 70 yard throw. Tough throw to make. He did under throw it but we really need a WR who can make a play on the ball in the air...that was why I wanted Alshon.
Crying or Very sad
_________________
Jared Cook: MIA

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
S-jax39


Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 6850
Location: [D]MV
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We couldve gotten alshon instead of pead. Nope.
_________________
Welp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El ramster


Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 46748
Location: Paul George's Bed.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

S-jax39 wrote:
We couldve gotten alshon instead of pead. Nope.


You guys are insane.. Way too early.. Way way too early.
Pead looks shady mccoy shifty.. You gotta let the kid develop
same with Quick..
_________________


mozwanted wrote:
I'm beginning to like the rg3 trade
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The J.R.S.


Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 3970
Location: Next to Waldo
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

El ramster wrote:
S-jax39 wrote:
We couldve gotten alshon instead of pead. Nope.


You guys are insane.. Way too early.. Way way too early.
Pead looks shady mccoy shifty.. You gotta let the kid develop
same with Quick..


Are we also going to pretend that Jeffery stood out in the Bears/Indy game? Because that's a joke, he barely showed up besides the one big play. That was busted coverage, Gibson would have made that same play.

Anyone ever notice that our opponents rarely blow coverage against our WRs? Do you think that is coincidence or can we finally admit that our pass catchers are pathetic?

Edit: Danny Amendola would be a reserve player on at least half the rosters in the NFL. We think he is a star because he is the only player on our team that has displayed the ability to make tough catches. He will never be the difference maker in a game, only a complimentary piece.
_________________


Real sports fans do not condone ESPN.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
S-jax39


Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 6850
Location: [D]MV
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No No, Amendola is a good player Imo. He'd start in the slot for alot of teams. He gets seperation and finds holes in zones and has reliable hands. The rest of our WRs? Nothing special. Been preaching this since we drafted Sam.

Also, im just not a huge fan of pead. I wouldve rather had another WR or a linemen there. I just dont think hes going to be anything special, and he cant even capture the back up role. Obviously I hope im wrong but its just an opinion.
_________________
Welp


Last edited by S-jax39 on Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El ramster


Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 46748
Location: Paul George's Bed.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saffold practice today. Not heavily but still promising.
_________________


mozwanted wrote:
I'm beginning to like the rg3 trade
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray


Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 562
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quick might have caught that pass, but I don't think
He would have had the same separation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
D9-EM


Joined: 06 Mar 2011
Posts: 705
Location: St. Louis, MO
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ray wrote:
Quick might have caught that pass, but I don't think
He would have had the same separation


Yea that's easy to say but it think Fisher has a plan for him. Its exciting to see Fisher actually developing these early round guys instead of burning them up right off the bat.
_________________
Go Rams!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jrry32


Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 49586
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The J.R.S. wrote:


Are we also going to pretend that Jeffery stood out in the Bears/Indy game? Because that's a joke, he barely showed up besides the one big play. That was busted coverage, Gibson would have made that same play.


First of all, Jeffery had 3 catches for 80 yards and a TD in his debut, I'd say that's standing out. Second of all, there was no busted coverage. Jeffery was matched up 1 on 1 with Vontae Davis and ran right by him.
_________________
The LBC wrote:
Harper41 wrote:
Don't worry. Sean Payton would pass the ball in a Tornado.

But would he do it in a Sharknado?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> St. Louis Rams All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group